05/06/2008 02:41 PM
>
>
> To
>
> cc
> backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject
> Re: [BackupPC-users] Using backuppc over WAN
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> > On 05/06 09:11 , [EMAIL PROTEC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Thanks, but what about weekly full backups? Would that swamp our remote
> 512mbps connections?
You may have to add a few machines at a time to get the initial copies
across, but subsequent runs only copy differences. Full runs do a block
checksum compare so they t
Hi Chris,
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:55:27PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks, but what about weekly full backups? Would that swamp our remote
> 512mbps connections?
No. The difference between full and incremental backup (using rsync) is
just that with full backup, some (configurabel)
Chris wrote:
> Thanks, but what about weekly full backups? Would that swamp our remote
> 512mbps connections?
You can always limit the bandwidth used by your backups.
> Our big issue here is retention - we have to keep backed up files
> indefinitely, can backuppc maintain a continually growing
install a
64-bit database server
Chris
Rob Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/06/2008 02:41 PM
To
cc
backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject
Re: [BackupPC-users] Using backuppc over WAN
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> On 05/06 09:11 , [EMAIL
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> On 05/06 09:11 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Has anyone used backuppc to backup over a WAN?
>
> Yes, many times.
>
> Just use rsync,
ditto. rsync will only transfer the changes, even on "full" backups.
remember to turn on compression, and experiment with som
On 05/06 09:11 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Has anyone used backuppc to backup over a WAN?
Yes, many times.
Just use rsync, remember to turn on compression, and experiment with some
ssh ciphers like arcfour or blowfish, which are a little less CPU-intensive
than the default.
--
Carl Soderstrom
