thank you. i will raise the timeout value... but i though 20 hours was
already enough... i'll give it a try.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's st
definitely stay away from rsync on the readynas because it just doesnt have
the ram or cpu to handle a massive rsync. as stated about, your timeout
looks to be too low. raise that number and good luck.
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Les Mikesell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leandro Tracchia wr
Leandro Tracchia wrote:
>
> whats a good linux command to count all your files???
find . |wc -l
add a -type f to the find command if you just want regular files.
--
Les Mikesell
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
This SF.net e
Hi Leandro,
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 08:27:20AM -0400, Leandro Tracchia wrote:
> thanks for your reply. like i said before, after the backup crashed it saved
> the partial dump and continued on the next wakeup schedule. that third time
> around the backup finished successfully because the next 2 e
thanks for your reply. like i said before, after the backup crashed it saved
the partial dump and continued on the next wakeup schedule. that third time
around the backup finished successfully because the next 2 entries on my log
are for the next 2 shares to backup (the last 3 lines are when i did
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 03:11:46PM -0400, Leandro Tracchia wrote:
> its been set at 72000 (20 hrs). is that really too low???
Depends on your data set. (But it shouldn't have stopped after 5 hours
then.) I've got a rather slow server with about 3 million files. It takes
about 30 hours to back it u
its been set at 72000 (20 hrs). is that really too low???
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> On 05/05 10:21 , Leandro Tracchia wrote:
> Personally, I never had any luck backing up a ReadyNAS via rsync. I don't
> remember if it was that we couldn't figure out how to enable the rsync
> daemon; or couldn't figure out how to get permission to access it; but I
On 05/05 11:34 , Jon Forrest wrote:
> Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> > If anyone has ever gotten rsync backups from an Infrant ReadyNAS to work,
> > please post how if you can. I'm sure it's possible, I just don't know how.
>
> I do it every day. It was so easy that I don't even recall what I ha
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:12:50AM -0400, Leandro Tracchia wrote:
> well it turns out the terastation does not even support NFS, however it does
> support Windows shares. I do have another NAS, a ReadyNAS which does support
> NFS so i decided to try this one out and started a full backup job to let
On 05/05 10:21 , Leandro Tracchia wrote:
> The ReadyNAS has CIFS,NFS, and Rsync capability.
Personally, I never had any luck backing up a ReadyNAS via rsync. I don't
remember if it was that we couldn't figure out how to enable the rsync
daemon; or couldn't figure out how to get permission to acce
The ReadyNAS has CIFS,NFS, and Rsync capability. For the moment I am just
mounting the ReadyNAS NFS share onto the Backuppc server. The Backuppc
server is using rsyncd to connect to the file server, which is a windows xp
machine.
Backuppc server has the following specs:
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual
does the ReadyNAS have rsync or are you just mounting up the NFS share
locally? If you are trying to use rsync then I suspect that the ReadyNAS
doesn't have enough RAM. Also, how much RAM does your system have? and are
you using rsync? rsync eats up RAM like candy when you have a high file
count
well it turns out the terastation does not even support NFS, however it does
support Windows shares. I do have another NAS, a ReadyNAS which does support
NFS so i decided to try this one out and started a full backup job to let it
run over the weekend. Uncompressed, the data needed to backup is abo
I have deleted all of the files I was playing with and dont really want to
duplicate the process but I can assure everyone that the hardlinks were
working correctly. In fact, the hardlinks we visible on the windows machine
and worked just fine.
On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 2:59 AM, Tino Schwarze <[EMAI
Hi dan,
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 12:14:41AM -0600, dan wrote:
Thanks for the work. This clears things up.
> I did a test on ubuntu 8.04
>
> created a samba share at /root/share
>
> i installed smbfs and then mounted that share via
>
> mount -t smbfs //localhost/share /mnt/sharetest
> cd /mnt/s
decided to look this up! smb1 does not support hardlinks but cifs and smb2
do. cifs is essentially smb1.1 or something which smb2 is a microsoft
rewrite of smb for vista and server2008. samba does support cifs which
means that you may use hardlinks with samba. you can also skip samba and
use th
This is true, samba does in fact support hard links but it is really just
like another NFS! the filesystem on the other end of the cifs share must
support hardlinks as samba is just the layer translating over the network.
Samba can scale better than NFS also.
I don't know if samba support hardlin
Leandro Tracchia wrote:
> i am trying to backup the data to a NAS (Terastation). i've already
> read somewhere that the NAS needs to have a filesystem that supports
> hardlinks in order for backuppc to be able to do its thing. smb/cifs
> does not support hardlinks (as far as i know) so i can
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 23:30 -0400, Leandro Tracchia wrote:
> i am trying to backup the data to a NAS (Terastation). i've already
> read somewhere that the NAS needs to have a filesystem that supports
> hardlinks in order for backuppc to be able to do its thing. smb/cifs
> does not support hardlink
20 matches
Mail list logo
