ok i thank rc.local runs before init.d...thanks!
I put these lines at the beginning of init.d script BackupPC but it seems i
cant stop/start/restart BackupPC server...
[root@backuppc ]# service backuppc stop
Stopping backuppc: No /usr/bin/perl found running; none killed.
ok.
[root@backuppc]#
Ok so i modified the script because $LOGDIR doesnt refer to the
/var/run/BackupPC...i could let PID files stored in /var/log/BackupPC but i
prefer /var/run...
Could someone tell me if it is ok or it doesnt matter...? It works well for me.
http://pastebin.com/6uvtHCvW
I have a problem with two BackupPC hosts, yet there's a further third
host that is working ok.
The problem is that a full backup does not seem to back up all files
on Windows hosts. An incremental backs up many more files than a full
one, or so it seems, looking at the version history.
On a
Hi,
Mikko Kortelainen wrote on 2014-10-14 12:18:00 +0300 [[BackupPC-users] Full
backup not backing up all files]:
I have a problem with two BackupPC hosts, yet there's a further third
host that is working ok.
The problem is that a full backup does not seem to back up all files
on Windows
Hi,
HAL9000 wrote on 2014-10-08 08:48:56 -0700 [[BackupPC-users] protocol version
mismatch -- is your shell clean?]:
[...]
Does anyone here know how to correct this?
yes, simply not do it. What on earth are you trying to do? You have no
apparent problem, except that you don't speak the rsync
Holger, thanks for your response.
The smb.conf should be pretty much stock on both machines. Besides
comments and whitespace, the only difference is this:
client ntlmv2 auth = no
That's set on the Samba 3.5 host but not on the 4.1. Actually it seems
that the default for that has changed from
Thank you, I had no problem in running full backup through CLI.
I hope next incremental backuppc will run fine
Messaggio originale
Da: absolutely_f...@libero.it
Data: 09/10/2014 15.14
A: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Ogg: [BackupPC-users] R: Re: Child exited prematurely
Hi
I need to know if there is a way to configure the apache conf file so that both
BackupPC and Nagios web interfaces will be accessible although they are running
off the same box.
I had BackupPC running fine, but the install instructions had me change the
httpd.conf file to:
User backuppc
Ok I found this little tidbit in some documentation:
As mentioned, the BackupPC user created on the system when installing the RPM
has to run Apache in order for everything to work properly with the CGIs and
mod_perl. Go ahead and setup the appropriate values in httpd.conf.
So BackupPC
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 2:53 PM, xpac backuppc-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
I need to know if there is a way to configure the apache conf file so that
both BackupPC and Nagios web interfaces will be accessible although they are
running off the same box.
I had BackupPC running fine, but
On 10/14/2014 02:53 PM, xpac wrote:
Is there a way to make it so that the BackupPC interface doesn't have to user
backuppc as the user in httpd.conf? Or some other way I can do this?
Take a look at the suexec Apache module. It lets you specify which user:group
each virtual host runs as. I
xpac backuppc-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote on 10/14/2014 03:59:26 PM:
Ok I found this little tidbit in some documentation:
As mentioned, the BackupPC user created on the system when
installing the RPM has to run Apache in order for everything to work
properly with the CGIs and mod_perl.
What OS distribution are you using, and are you using their packaged
version of backuppc? Usually you would make the cgi script run setuid
backuppc with support from suid_perl, mod_suid, or a wrapper written
in C, but the details may vary with what your OS provides and allows.
I'm running
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 4:10 PM, xpac backuppc-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote:
What OS distribution are you using, and are you using their packaged
version of backuppc? Usually you would make the cgi script run setuid
backuppc with support from suid_perl, mod_suid, or a wrapper written
in C,
14 matches
Mail list logo
