Re: [BackupPC-users] Forbidden You don't have permission to access /BackupPC on this server.

2015-09-21 Thread Timothy Murphy
On Sunday 20 September 2015 18:18:21 Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > Yes, you are correct. I tried "apache" and "backuppc" groups and nothing > changed. (It is suppose to be backuppc:apache by most accounts I am > reading.) Can you try to access BackupPC from the server on which it is running, by

Re: [BackupPC-users] Forbidden You don't have permission to access /BackupPC on this server.

2015-09-21 Thread Bob of Donelson Trophy
First, my only comment on top posting. Here in the states most email clients default to top posting. Therefore, if I set my defaults to bottom post (as requested but not mandatory by all mailing list I participate in) my US customers (who, grant you, are NOT logical and think email should be i

Re: [BackupPC-users] Forbidden You don't have permission to access /BackupPC on this server.

2015-09-21 Thread Les Mikesell
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 7:03 AM, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > First, my only comment on top posting. > > Here in the states most email clients default to top posting. Therefore, if > I set my defaults to bottom post (as requested but not mandatory by all > mailing list I participate in) my US c

Re: [BackupPC-users] Forbidden You don't have permission to access /BackupPC on this server.

2015-09-21 Thread Bob of Donelson Trophy
I really do not want to talk about top posting and the all the reasons I have little choice in the matter . . . please. Regarding my permissions issue. I have really begun to think that CentOS 7 is a little too new for this particular installation. I am still learning about selinux and it's be

[BackupPC-users] BackupPC v4 running fsck all the time

2015-09-21 Thread Jimmy
Hi, It seems that BackupPC v4 runs fsck each time it does a backup, both incr or full. After an actual backup, it would run fsck on all the backups that it has for the host. For example, host "pc1" has backup #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, and the new backup created #8. After BackupPC created backup

Re: [BackupPC-users] Forbidden You don't have permission to access /BackupPC on this server.

2015-09-21 Thread Stefan Peter
Dear Bob of Donelson Trophy Please find my comments interspersed below: (this is the stanza I use for noobs) On 21.09.2015 14:03, Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > First, my only comment on top posting. > > Here in the states most email clients default to top posting. Therefore, > if I set my defa

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC v4 running fsck all the time

2015-09-21 Thread David Cramblett
I'm not certain, but I don't think my centos based v4 system is doing this. Do the fsck show in the log? I will investigate when I get back to my computer. David Sent from my mobile device David Cramblett On Sep 21, 2015 10:48 AM, "Jimmy" wrote: > Hi, > > It seems that BackupPC v4 runs fsck e

Re: [BackupPC-users] Forbidden You don't have permission to access /BackupPC on this server.

2015-09-21 Thread Kris Lou
In both cases (6, 7), your easiest path of installation is probably to just hook into EPEL repositories and install BackupPC (3.3.1) via yum. Certainly a lot easier than finding and installing dependencies manually. I'm in a similar dilemma with regards to CentOS 7 upgrades, but I figure I have 5

Re: [BackupPC-users] Forbidden You don't have permission to access /BackupPC on this server.

2015-09-21 Thread Bob of Donelson Trophy
I just finished installing C6.7 and BackuppPC 3.3.1. It went like a charm. Getting ready to take the machine to it's final home. I am not complaining but the documentation always lags (with any distro) and the issues I was having with C7 are most likely related to the newer systemd, selinux or

Re: [BackupPC-users] Forbidden You don't have permission to access /BackupPC on this server.

2015-09-21 Thread Timothy Murphy
On Monday 21 September 2015 12:06:02 Kris Lou wrote: > In both cases (6, 7), your easiest path of installation is probably to just > hook into EPEL repositories and install BackupPC (3.3.1) via yum. > Certainly a lot easier than finding and installing dependencies manually. > > I'm in a similar d

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC v4 running fsck all the time

2015-09-21 Thread Jimmy
David, No, the fsck / delete actions aren't mentioned in the log. In the log I can only see: full|incr backup started for share x full|incr backup NNN complete, xx files, y bytes Perhaps yours does the fsck too, but just very quickly so it may not be noticeable. Try running a backup

Re: [BackupPC-users] Forbidden You don't have permission to access /BackupPC on this server.

2015-09-21 Thread Timothy Murphy
On Monday 21 September 2015 12:11:39 Bob of Donelson Trophy wrote: > Regarding my permissions issue. I have really begun to think that CentOS > 7 is a little too new for this particular installation. I'm not sure what this means - you seem to have installed BackupPC OK. > I am still > learning a

Re: [BackupPC-users] Forbidden You don't have permission to access /BackupPC on this server.

2015-09-21 Thread Kris Lou
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > What exactly is the dilemma? > Time! I do not has it! Actually, I'm not sure if Sernet has released compatible AD Samba 4 packages for RHEL/CentOS 7 or not. Problems regarding Heimdal vs MIT Kerberos if I recall, but I haven't looked in

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC v4 running fsck all the time

2015-09-21 Thread David Cramblett
Yes, your right. It does appear that it's running the fsck on every exisiting backup for the given host. David On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Jimmy wrote: > David, > > No, the fsck / delete actions aren't mentioned in the log. In the log I > can only see: > > full|incr backup started for shar