Chris Stone wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 12:27 +1000, Les Stott wrote:
Chris Stone wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 11:26 +1000, Les Stott wrote:
Chris Stone wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:51 +1000, Les Stott
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 12:27 +1000, Les Stott wrote:
> Chris Stone wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 11:26 +1000, Les Stott wrote:
> >
> > > Chris Stone wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:51 +1000, Les Stott wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Just tried this myself (upgrade existing 2.1.1
Chris Stone wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 11:26 +1000, Les Stott wrote:
Chris Stone wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:51 +1000, Les Stott wrote:
Just tried this myself (upgrade existing 2.1.1 installation) and when
running configure.pl, I get:
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 11:26 +1000, Les Stott wrote:
> Chris Stone wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:51 +1000, Les Stott wrote:
> >
> > Just tried this myself (upgrade existing 2.1.1 installation) and when
> > running configure.pl, I get:
> >
> > --
Chris Stone wrote:
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:51 +1000, Les Stott wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi I just did this last night in about 15 minutes.
stop backuppc
first go to CPAN and install "File::RsyncP" to upgrade it to .0.64
Then download the tarball, extract it and run
perl
On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 10:51 +1000, Les Stott wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi I just did this last night in about 15 minutes.
>
> stop backuppc
>
> first go to CPAN and install "File::RsyncP" to upgrade it to .0.64
>
> Then download the tarball, extract it and run
>
> perl configure.pl
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What's the best method for upgrading a current installation of BackupPC to
> 3.0?
> Maybe I'm really stupid, but I can't find this info anywhere.
>
>
Hi I just did this last night in about 15 minutes.
stop backuppc
first go to CPAN and install "File::RsyncP" to upg
What's the best method for upgrading a current installation of BackupPC to
3.0?
Maybe I'm really stupid, but I can't find this info anywhere.
Thanks a lot,
ck
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/
On 08/08 02:02 , Paul Estes wrote:
> I accidently dumped a 4GB file into a partition that gets backed up by
> BackupPC. I don't need it backed up, and I keep a fairly long history of
> backups in the pool, so I don't want to wait for it to age out of the
> pool. Is there any way to remove this one
Using backuppc 2.1.2 on a debian dapper 6.0.6 and bacing up 3 computers it
backs up fine the client computers but on localhost it gives errors,
this is a part of the error message
/bin/tar:
./usr/share/zope/Products/CPSDocument/skins/cps_document/getDocumentSchemas.py:
file is unchanged; not du
Hi,
I've searched the
archives and haven't been able to find this question posted before. I hope it's
not an FAQ.
I accidently dumped
a 4GB file into a partition that gets backed up by BackupPC. I don't need it
backed up, and I keep a fairly long history of backups in the pool, so I don'
Hi!
It seems IPv6 dns-lookups () doesn't work. I get "Host not found".
Any plans on implementing that?
Cheers, /C
PS Please CC me on reply, I'm not subscribed. DS
--
Christian Bjälevik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello all:
First of all, if I can get backuppc working it looks to rock!
I have a couple of questions:
I am running Ubuntu V6.06 LTS, Backuppc V2.1.2.
1) My installation is in the wrong place. It is on my bootable 20GB hard
drive, not my 160GB second drive. How do I move my installation and
st
In the message dated: Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:21:44 +0200,
The pithy ruminations from Casper Thomsen on
were:
=> On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Ralf Gross wrote:
=> (...)
=> >> What would be really great to have is the possibility to ensure that I
=> >> have the last n revisions of files; no matter how many f
On Wed, 2006-08-09 at 03:56, Ralf Gross wrote:
> >
> > What would be really great to have is the possibility to ensure that I
> > have the last n revisions of files; no matter how many fulls or
> > incrementals. I guess this is not the main goal of BackupPC (that is, to
> > somewhat be a revision c
On Wed, 9 Aug 2006, Ralf Gross wrote:
(...)
>> What would be really great to have is the possibility to ensure that I
>> have the last n revisions of files; no matter how many fulls or
>> incrementals.
(...)
>
> I also think this would be the job of a revision control system.
Or the job of a reall
Casper Thomsen said:
> Maybe this is a feature request, and maybe it is just a show off how dumb
> I am---let's see.
>
> What would be really great to have is the possibility to ensure that I
> have the last n revisions of files; no matter how many fulls or
> incrementals. I guess this is not the
Hello all
Maybe this is a feature request, and maybe it is just a show off how dumb
I am---let's see.
What would be really great to have is the possibility to ensure that I
have the last n revisions of files; no matter how many fulls or
incrementals. I guess this is not the main goal of Backu
18 matches
Mail list logo
