Gregor Schmid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anything special to consider when upgrading from 2.1 to 3.0?
I found very little on the net and in the docs, I guess that implies
that configure.pl is working just fine.
it works very well. for those of us not fluent in perl, the hardest
part
Paul Fox wrote:
Gregor Schmid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anything special to consider when upgrading from 2.1 to 3.0?
I found very little on the net and in the docs, I guess that implies
that configure.pl is working just fine.
it works very well. for those of us not fluent in perl,
I installed version 3 to be able to access old archives that had no
entries in file backups. But when I run the recovery tool I get:
Doing host localhost
*** No info for backup number 207
*** No info for backup number 266
*** No info for backup number 322
*** No info for backup
David writes:
I installed version 3 to be able to access old archives that had no
entries in file backups. But when I run the recovery tool I get:
The recovery program by default relies on new meta data that
is stored (below each pc/HOST/nnn directory) when a backup is
made under 3.x.
If you
Some stats using rsync vs using tar on a file system with big files
Server is a FreeBSD 6.2 box, 2.93Ghz Celeron with 768MB Ram., RAID10 on
a 3ware 9500Scontroller.
client is a Mac pro dual/dual xeon 2.66 6GB ram
source drive 94GB of media files average file size 10MB on a 250GB
