Re: [BackupPC-users] The 64$ question

2010-09-16 Thread Timothy Omer
On 16 September 2010 05:51, Charles E Johnson Sr cejohnso...@cableone.net wrote: What is the URL to the web interface? I read through the docs, searched the archives even tried Google, but didn't see it anywhere. Thanx, Ed

Re: [BackupPC-users] The 64$ question

2010-09-16 Thread Michael MH. Heel
if you set it up correct its /BackupPC_Admin. Am 16.09.2010 um 07:20 schrieb Charles E Johnson Sr cejohnso...@cableone.net: What is the URL to the web interface? I read through the docs, searched the archives even tried Google, but didn't see it anywhere. Thanx, Ed

Re: [BackupPC-users] The 64$ question

2010-09-16 Thread Timothy Omer
On 16 September 2010 08:00, Michael MH. Heel m...@heel-data.de wrote: if you set it up correct its /BackupPC_Admin. Am 16.09.2010 um 07:20 schrieb Charles E Johnson Sr cejohnso...@cableone.net: What is the URL to the web interface? I read through the docs, searched the archives even

Re: [BackupPC-users] The 64$ question

2010-09-16 Thread Les Mikesell
On 9/16/10 2:36 AM, Timothy Omer wrote: Alias /BackupPC/images/usr/share/BackupPC/html/ ScriptAlias /BackupPC /usr/share/BackupPC/sbin/BackupPC_Admin fyi - im running CentOS 5 and installed from YUM The location actually depends on how the program was

Re: [BackupPC-users] The 64$ question

2010-09-16 Thread Michael MH. Heel
On centos i would install from the tarball from backuppc website cause the centos test repos. has an older version. Viele Grüße Michael Heel Heel Datensysteme Drachenseestr.8b 81373 München Tel.: +49 89 510 890-31 Fax: +49 89 510 890-32 Mobil: +49 178 28 28 228 -Ursprüngliche

[BackupPC-users] german special character wrong in web ui

2010-09-16 Thread Michael MH. Heel
Hello. When browsing backups in the webinterface german special characters like (ü,ä,ö) are not showing correctly (�beld�bel.test). when i restore this file i get the right filename downloaed (übeldübel.test). the rest oft he webinterface shows this character correctly. Also the filename is

[BackupPC-users] Surprising disk usage, *not* a link problem (I don't think)

2010-09-16 Thread Robin Lee Powell
I have a fairly large (171 hosts) backup environment that seems to be using rather more disk than it should. GUI says: Pool is 3055.59GB comprising 7361233 files and 4369 directories (as of 9/16 01:33), df says: FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/local-backups

Re: [BackupPC-users] MOTD breaking rsync...

2010-09-16 Thread RC
Allen allen.stowe at rogers.com writes: Try touch .hushlogin in the users home to suppress MOTD and other stuff. I appreciate the suggestion, but the banner poping up isn't the actual motd, though I put that in the subject to quickly give peope the right idea. I did try creating a .hushlogin

Re: [BackupPC-users] MOTD breaking rsync...

2010-09-16 Thread RC
Jon Craig cannedspam.cant at gmail.com writes: If you want the benefits of rsync then you must live with its limitations. This is not a limitation of rsync. I specifically said rsync (C binary) works just fine. The Perl::File::RSyncP doesn't seem to be ignoring the junk, and waiting for the

[BackupPC-users] BackupPC full backup speed VS iperf measurement

2010-09-16 Thread Daniel Sperka
Hi - I have been looking at network transfer speeds and comparing them to the rates reported for full backups. The full backups use rsync, server is a Mac Xserve, client is an Ubuntu Hardy machine. This is NOT the first backup of the machine. This machine is also using checksum caching. The

Re: [BackupPC-users] MOTD breaking rsync...

2010-09-16 Thread Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
RC wrote at about 21:08:32 + on Thursday, September 16, 2010: Jon Craig cannedspam.cant at gmail.com writes:   I mean your living with SCO (SCO really, are you serious??!). Plenty of large companies have legacy SCO systems they need to keep around. An attitude like yours is a

Re: [BackupPC-users] BackupPC full backup speed VS iperf measurement

2010-09-16 Thread Les Mikesell
On 9/16/10 7:27 PM, Daniel Sperka wrote: If, on the other hand, I assume that rsync is doing file comparisons on both ends and transferring files as needed (i.e. those which are different than those in the pool, or which are new), then the actual amount of data transferred is less than the