Re: [BackupPC-users] File System containing backup was too full

2017-12-24 Thread Adrien Coestesquis
Hello Craig, BackupPC reports the right disk usage and i don't have any other BackupPc daemon running on this machine. I think the disk usage trigger was up at a time, it was legit. But now, the notification is always sent, no matter what i'm trying to do. Anyway, Backups are still OK for now. I

Re: [BackupPC-users] Direct restore broken with BackupPC 4.1.x and SMB3?

2017-12-24 Thread Craig Barratt via BackupPC-users
This is a cross-post of the github issue you created 2 days ago. I responded there. Craig On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Jens Potthast < jens.potth...@innovation.uni-bremen.de> wrote: > Hello list! > After many hours of tests and research, I

Re: [BackupPC-users] File System containing backup was too full

2017-12-24 Thread Craig Barratt via BackupPC-users
This log message: 2017-12-19 01:00:00 24hr disk usage: 68% max, 68% recent, 0 skipped hosts correctly shows the disk usage, and also says that no hosts were skipped. Is there any chance you are running two different BackupPCs, and the 2nd one is on a different system that is in fact 96% full?

Re: [BackupPC-users] Trouble with restore

2017-12-24 Thread Craig Barratt via BackupPC-users
It looks like this issue was opened on github a couple of days ago. I responded there with some suggestions. Craig On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 10:50 AM, Holger Parplies wrote: > Hi, > > let's start over. > > Jens Potthast wrote

Re: [BackupPC-users] Problems with BackupPC - RSync

2017-12-24 Thread Craig Barratt via BackupPC-users
There could be a lot of reasons for this. Start by looking for errors in the server log file, and the XferLOG.bad.z file in the client's backup directory. Craig On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Jeffrey West via BackupPC-users < backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > All, > > > > I have

Re: [BackupPC-users] Where's the full backup the incrementals need?

2017-12-24 Thread Craig Barratt via BackupPC-users
In 4.x the incrementals are stored as deltas relative to the next (future) backup. So your unfilled backups #4 depends on #5, #5 depends on #6, and #6 depends on the filled (full) backup #7. Craig On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 1:16 PM, Jamie Burchell wrote: > Hey > > > > Am I