On 09/11 09:40 , Alexander Moisseev via BackupPC-users wrote:
> On 11.09.2019 18:19, Robert Trevellyan wrote:
> > I'm letting ZFS do the compression (using the default of LZ4) with BackupPC
> > handling deduplication. I think you'll find a reasonable consensus that ZFS
> > compression is always
On 11.09.2019 18:19, Robert Trevellyan wrote:
I'm letting ZFS do the compression (using the default of LZ4) with BackupPC
handling deduplication. I think you'll find a reasonable consensus that ZFS
compression is always a win for storage space (it will store un-compressible
data unmodified),
Yeah, 'noatime' is a good idea for BackupPC in general.
Thanks for the advice on compression, it's good to know.
On 09/11 11:26 , Robert Trevellyan wrote:
> One more thing about ZFS in general - I always set noatime.
--
Carl Soderstrom
Systems Administrator
Real-Time Enterprises
One more thing about ZFS in general - I always set noatime.
Robert Trevellyan
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:50 PM Carl Soderstrom <
carl.soderst...@real-time.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the advice. Anyone else care to share their experience?
>
> On 09/10 02:57 , Ray Frush wrote:
> > We backup to a
I'm letting ZFS do the compression (using the default of LZ4) with BackupPC
handling deduplication. I think you'll find a reasonable consensus that ZFS
compression is always a win for storage space (it will store
un-compressible data unmodified), whereas ZFS deduplication is best avoided
in most
