Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Meyer [mailto:matthias.me...@gmx.li]
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:35 PM
To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Check-if-alive-pings alternatives
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Short of making the router
-Original Message-
From: Matthias Meyer [mailto:matthias.me...@gmx.li]
Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2010 11:35 PM
To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Check-if-alive-pings alternatives
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Short of making the router visible on the network
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Hi all,
I have a server that sits behind a router (server is NAT:ed) and allows
ssh connections in. That is to say, the *only* thing it allows in is ssh
connections.
Now, BackupPC uses pings to check if the machine to be backed up is alive.
Since the router in question
Hi all,
I have a server that sits behind a router (server is NAT:ed) and allows ssh
connections in. That is to say, the *only* thing it allows in is ssh
connections.
Now, BackupPC uses pings to check if the machine to be backed up is alive.
Since the router in question doesnt respond to any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tino Schwarze wrote:
Hi Sorin,
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 11:29:11AM +0100, Sorin Srbu wrote:
I have a server that sits behind a router (server is NAT:ed) and allows ssh
connections in. That is to say, the *only* thing it allows in is ssh
-Original Message-
From: Tino Schwarze [mailto:backuppc.li...@tisc.de]
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 12:32 PM
To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Check-if-alive-pings alternatives
Short of making the router visible on the network for pings
-Original Message-
From: Adam Goryachev [mailto:mailingli...@websitemanagers.com.au]
Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 12:36 PM
To: General list for user discussion, questions and support
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Check-if-alive-pings alternatives
You have a number of options:
1) Change