On 11/28/2017 11:03 AM, Alexander Kobel wrote:
On 11/28/2017 05:46 PM, Nick Bright wrote:
On 11/28/2017 10:38 AM, Nick Bright wrote:
Is there a way to mark a backup point (in this case, it's an
incremental) so that the backup (and all backups it depends on) are
preeminently retained?
e.g.
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick Bright [mailto:nick.bri...@valnet.net]
> Sent: den 28 november 2017 17:47
> To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Mark backup for premenent retention
>
> On 11/28/2017 10:38 AM, Nick Bright wrot
On 11/28/2017 05:46 PM, Nick Bright wrote:
On 11/28/2017 10:38 AM, Nick Bright wrote:
Is there a way to mark a backup point (in this case, it's an
incremental) so that the backup (and all backups it depends on) are
preeminently retained?
e.g. for a server that's failed or been
On 11/28/2017 10:38 AM, Nick Bright wrote:
Is there a way to mark a backup point (in this case, it's an
incremental) so that the backup (and all backups it depends on) are
preeminently retained?
e.g. for a server that's failed or been decommissioned?
I may have already done so by disabling
Is there a way to mark a backup point (in this case, it's an
incremental) so that the backup (and all backups it depends on) are
preeminently retained?
e.g. for a server that's failed or been decommissioned?
--
---
- Nick Bright
