Re: [BackupPC-users] Bare Metal Restore for Microsoft Windows XP

2010-03-08 Thread Michael Stowe
> Michael Stowe wrote at about 15:00:06 -0600 on Monday, March 8, 2010: > > > Your method does allow for the most recent (more or less) snapshot of > most > > > of the relevant windoz files but doing an image every so often would > > > essentially do the same thing. > > > > To clarify a bit:

Re: [BackupPC-users] Bare Metal Restore for Microsoft Windows XP

2010-03-08 Thread Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
Michael Stowe wrote at about 15:00:06 -0600 on Monday, March 8, 2010: > > Your method does allow for the most recent (more or less) snapshot of most > > of the relevant windoz files but doing an image every so often would > > essentially do the same thing. > > To clarify a bit: it allows for

Re: [BackupPC-users] Bare Metal Restore for Microsoft Windows XP

2010-03-08 Thread Michael Stowe
> Perhaps I missed something in reading this, or my interpretation of a > 'bare metal restore' is different from yours. I use the term "bare metal" in the sense that when the process is started, there is no software or operating system installed. In other words, I'm talking about the system being

Re: [BackupPC-users] Bare Metal Restore for Microsoft Windows XP

2010-03-08 Thread John Hudak
Perhaps I missed something in reading this, or my interpretation of a 'bare metal restore' is different from yours. My definition of 'bare metal restore' is taking essentially an image of the current disk, copying it to some media, and then using that image to do a bit-by-bit (sector-by-sector, tr

Re: [BackupPC-users] Bare Metal Restore for Microsoft Windows XP

2010-03-08 Thread Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
Michael Stowe wrote at about 10:40:04 -0600 on Monday, March 8, 2010: > > On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Michael Stowe wrote: > > > >> > >> Out of necessity, I had an opportunity to try out restoring a system > >> from > >> scratch with nothing but BackupPC backups. I'm happy to report that the > >> p

Re: [BackupPC-users] Bare Metal Restore for Microsoft Windows XP

2010-03-08 Thread Michael Stowe
> Although I haven't tested it on a bare metal restore, I believe that > my code that runs subinacl (and also optionally getfacl) to back up > the Windows ACL's should take care of all file ownership, permissions, > and ACLs (note that 'getfacl' only captures a subset of the full > Windows acl's).

Re: [BackupPC-users] Bare Metal Restore for Microsoft Windows XP

2010-03-08 Thread Michael Stowe
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Michael Stowe wrote: > >> >> Out of necessity, I had an opportunity to try out restoring a system >> from >> scratch with nothing but BackupPC backups. I'm happy to report that the >> process works, with a few limitations and quirks. >> >> I've documented it here: >> >> http:

[BackupPC-users] Bare Metal Restore for Microsoft Windows XP

2010-03-05 Thread Michael Stowe
Out of necessity, I had an opportunity to try out restoring a system from scratch with nothing but BackupPC backups. I'm happy to report that the process works, with a few limitations and quirks. I've documented it here: http://www.goodjobsucking.com/?p=219