No not easily, no. The iSCSI disk is from a NAS with 16TB of storage (as
was the NFS share) and BackupPC doesn't currently run on the NAS.
On 29/09/2023 16:35, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 1:46 AM David While via BackupPC-users
wrote:
Hi
Yes I believe that could be the cause.
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 1:46 AM David While via BackupPC-users
wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Yes I believe that could be the cause. I did some tests with the storage
> mounted as NFS and then mounted as an ISCSI disk.
>
> The ISCSI disk was considerably faster.
Can you run the backup against the host of
Hi,
and thanks for your information. Does anyone testet to cut one big job
into smaller ones?
Thx
Am 29.09.23 um 08:26 schrieb David While via BackupPC-users:
Hi
Yes I believe that could be the cause. I did some tests with the
storage mounted as NFS and then mounted as an ISCSI disk.
Hi
Yes I believe that could be the cause. I did some tests with the storage
mounted as NFS and then mounted as an ISCSI disk.
The ISCSI disk was considerably faster.
David While
On 29/09/2023 00:05, Robert Trevellyan wrote:
"The storage is connected via NFS."
^^^
I suspect this is the main
"The storage is connected via NFS."
^^^
I suspect this is the main bottleneck.
Robert Trevellyan
On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 5:11 PM wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i use BackupPC on Linux with rsync since a while. One Task as a full
> backup with
