On Wednesday 22 August 2007 05:28, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Nick Pope wrote:
> > On Aug 21, 2007, at 8:25 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> >> On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Nick Pope wrote:
> >>> On Aug 20, 2007, at 12:48 PM, David Boyes wrote:
> > I would like to second this. Right
On Wednesday 22 August 2007 04:34, Nick Pope wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2007, at 8:25 PM, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> > On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Nick Pope wrote:
> >> On Aug 20, 2007, at 12:48 PM, David Boyes wrote:
> I would like to second this. Right now I have duplicates of
> everything
> to
It's a PostgreSQL message, nothing to worry about. It's just a warning telling
you that you will in a future version of postgresql be required to use the
E'' syntax if you still want to escape strings. It's to make postgresql more
SQL compliant. NOthing to worry about, it may even spit that at v
On 21 Aug 2007 at 23:34, Eric Bollengier wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Yes, bacula is using PQescapeString which is an older, deprecated version of
> PQescapeStringConn. We have to use the new version to avoid this message,
> but it's not so easy at this time :)
>
> It's in my todo list.
I'll do it.
>
On Mon, 2007-08-20 at 08:04 -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
> >
> > There are basically three queries. One to get a list of directories,
> > another to get a list of files and one to get a list of versions for a
> > specific file.
> >
> > 1. To get a list of directories given a list of jobs. Here is
> Copypools
> Extract capability (#25)
> Continued enhancement of bweb
> Threshold triggered migration jobs (not currently in list, but will be
> needed ASAP)
> Client triggered backups
> Complete rework of the scheduling system (not in list)
> Performance and usage instrumentation (not in list)
>
Hello,
Yes, bacula is using PQescapeString which is an older, deprecated version of
PQescapeStringConn. We have to use the new version to avoid this message,
but it's not so easy at this time :)
It's in my todo list.
Bye
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 23:27:22 Dan Langille wrote:
> FYI: I encounter
FYI: I encountered the following when running bscan from version
2.0.3 using PostgreSQL 8.2.1 and FreeBSD 6.2.
21-Aug 17:05 bscan: End of file 336 on device "NEO 2000" (/dev/nsa0),
Volume "AHP675L3"
bscan: bscan.c:677 2,686,976 file records. At file:blk=336:377,119
bytes=113,081,204,577
bscan:
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 17:18, David Boyes wrote:
> > Of all the projects on the projects list, which 2 or 3 do you think
>
> are
>
> > most
> > important from an enterprise standpoint?
>
> That's a very open-ended question...8-) Careful what you wish for.
>
> IMHO, here's what my wish list would
Hello again,
By the way, in the bug report, please show the date generated by both the mail
(or Mail) and bsmtp commands. On my machine the dates seem to be correct.
Perhaps postfixing (CEST) confuses someone's email program as that is the
only difference between mail and bsmtp (bsmtp has an
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 19:59, Dan Langille wrote:
> FYI, a proposed solution for the date problem.
>
> --- Forwarded message follows ---
> From: "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date sent:Tue, 21
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 19:59, Dan Langille wrote:
> FYI, a proposed solution for the date problem.
>
> --- Forwarded message follows ---
> From: "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date sent:Tue, 21
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 19:43, Steven Shoemaker wrote:
> Kern,
>
> We are not that big a site (~270 clients, data ~6TB, tapes LTO3) but are
> considering testing bacula to see if it would meet our needs.
> We currently do a GFS rotation schedule with a temporary injunction
> against recycling.
>
FYI, a proposed solution for the date problem.
--- Forwarded message follows ---
From: "Dan Langille" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ryan Novosielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date sent: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:55:03 -0400
Priority: normal
Co
> Of all the projects on the projects list, which 2 or 3 do you think
are
> most
> important from an enterprise standpoint?
That's a very open-ended question...8-) Careful what you wish for.
IMHO, here's what my wish list would be:
Copypools
Extract capability (#25)
Continued enhancement of bw
On Tuesday 14 August 2007 20:10, Michael Brennen wrote:
> On Tuesday 14 August 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Monday 13 August 2007 23:50, Dan Langille wrote:
> > > On 13 Aug 2007 at 20:06, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:37:28 -0400, Dan Langille said:
> > > > >
> > >
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> However the synthetic backup is not dependent on having information about
> deleted files. The synthetic backup will simply take what is in the catalog
> an run with it.
I was working on the basis of an accurate full backup. Without knowing
which files
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
>> To my mind, these pretty much all use the same code inasmuch as one is
>> wanting to generate a new full backup to tape (or restore to disk) based
>> on what's in the database and in the volumes for any given backup date,
>> while weeding files which had
My observation:
> Item 1: Accurate restoration of renamed/deleted files
> Item 3: Merge multiple backups (Synthetic Backup or Consolidation)
To my mind, these pretty much all use the same code inasmuch as one is
wanting to generate a new full backup to tape (or restore to disk) based
on wh
Gustavo Gibson da Silva escreveu:
> Kern Sibbald escreveu:
>> On Tuesday 31 July 2007 21:47, Gustavo Gibson da Silva wrote:
>>> Kern Sibbald escreveu:
[..Lots of text deleted..]
>> You should most likely open a bug report, but if you want it to get some
>> attention, you will need to distill it
Disney World?? :)
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of
On Tuesday 14 August 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Monday 13 August 2007 23:50, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On 13 Aug 2007 at 20:06, Martin Simmons wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:37:28 -0400, Dan Langille said:
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to build Bat on FreeBSD. What configure options did
I thought that if I moved the files to a different catalog (so the path
specified in fd.conf is wrong), or delete them bacula won't be able to
restore. I also tried to restore to a different FD and it also worked. I
can view the files. Did I do something wrong or is it how it's supposed to
be?
Than
Thanks Michael!
I tried using it, but after testing it seems that bacula restores the
files even without the key (i backed up everything using the example data
configuration, moved keys to different catalogs and then restored the data
without any problems). Do you have any idea why did it happen?
24 matches
Mail list logo
