Re: [Bacula-devel] 5.0.2 compile errors

2010-05-01 Thread Dan Langille
On May 1, 2010, at 5:53 AM, Panagiotis Christias wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Dan Langille > wrote: >> On 4/28/2010 5:05 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:46:22 -0400, Steve Polyack said: On 04/28/10 14:15, Kern Sibbald wrote: > I suspect th

Re: [Bacula-devel] 5.0.2 compile errors

2010-05-01 Thread Panagiotis Christias
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Dan Langille wrote: > On 4/28/2010 5:05 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: >>> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:46:22 -0400, Steve Polyack said: >>> >>> On 04/28/10 14:15, Kern Sibbald wrote: I suspect that is something that we have seen before.  If you explicitly add

Re: [Bacula-devel] 5.0.2 compile errors

2010-04-28 Thread Dan Langille
On 4/28/2010 5:05 PM, Martin Simmons wrote: >> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:46:22 -0400, Steve Polyack said: >> >> On 04/28/10 14:15, Kern Sibbald wrote: >>> I suspect that is something that we have seen before. If you explicitly add >>> libraries (I suspect that you did, because Linker flags is set

Re: [Bacula-devel] 5.0.2 compile errors

2010-04-28 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:46:22 -0400, Steve Polyack said: > > On 04/28/10 14:15, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > I suspect that is something that we have seen before. If you explicitly add > > libraries (I suspect that you did, because Linker flags is set, which is > > not "normal"), Bacula could the

Re: [Bacula-devel] 5.0.2 compile errors

2010-04-28 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Wednesday 28 April 2010 20:46:22 Steve Polyack wrote: > On 04/28/10 14:15, Kern Sibbald wrote: > > I suspect that is something that we have seen before. If you explicitly > > add libraries (I suspect that you did, because Linker flags is set, which > > is not "normal"), Bacula could then link a

Re: [Bacula-devel] 5.0.2 compile errors

2010-04-28 Thread Steve Polyack
On 04/28/10 14:15, Kern Sibbald wrote: > I suspect that is something that we have seen before. If you explicitly add > libraries (I suspect that you did, because Linker flags is set, which is > not "normal"), Bacula could then link against previously installed libraries > rather than its own libra

Re: [Bacula-devel] 5.0.2 compile errors

2010-04-28 Thread Kern Sibbald
I suspect that is something that we have seen before. If you explicitly add libraries (I suspect that you did, because Linker flags is set, which is not "normal"), Bacula could then link against previously installed libraries rather than its own library that it has just built, and you will get

[Bacula-devel] 5.0.2 compile errors

2010-04-28 Thread Dan Langille
I tried to compile 5.0.2 on FreeBSD 8. I'm not sure if I've messed something up yet, but just in case it's not me... :) The full output is at: http://www.langille.org/tmp/bacula.errors The error part is: Linking bacula-dir ... /var/ports/usr/home/dan/src/sysutils/bacula-server/work/bacula-5.0.2