On Monday 25 May 2009 15:43:38 Marco van Wieringen wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:31 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > > Uh I would say we could it a bit different, we check if --enable-acls
> > > is set (so thats different then now) and then complain if things are
> > > not installed. Then we can
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 15:31 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >
> > Uh I would say we could it a bit different, we check if --enable-acls is
> > set (so thats different then now) and then complain if things are not
> > installed. Then we can easily change the configure used in the rpm building
> > (SPEC
On Monday 25 May 2009 11:31:43 Marco van Wieringen wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 10:38 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Monday 25 May 2009 00:27:23 Arno Lehmann wrote:
> > > Hi packagers (Felix in particular :-),
> > >
> > > I wonder if it's intentional that ACL support is not included in (at
> >
On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 10:38 +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Monday 25 May 2009 00:27:23 Arno Lehmann wrote:
> > Hi packagers (Felix in particular :-),
> >
> > I wonder if it's intentional that ACL support is not included in (at
> > least some of) the packages.
> >
> > I have installed bacula-postgr
On Monday 25 May 2009 00:27:23 Arno Lehmann wrote:
> Hi packagers (Felix in particular :-),
>
> I wonder if it's intentional that ACL support is not included in (at
> least some of) the packages.
>
> I have installed bacula-postgresql-3.0.1-1.el5.x86_64.rpm from the
> sourceforge download page, and
Hi packagers (Felix in particular :-),
I wonder if it's intentional that ACL support is not included in (at
least some of) the packages.
I have installed bacula-postgresql-3.0.1-1.el5.x86_64.rpm from the
sourceforge download page, and found this to not include ACL support.
(This is a CentOS 5
