Yes, this looks like an oversight on my part. The editing was done unsigned
and it should have used signed numbers.
I've attached a patch to this email that should correct the problem. I
have compiled the patch, but have not explicitly tested it with a long
retention period, so feedback would
On Thursday 23 October 2008, Dan Langille said something like:
> FYI
>
> Begin forwarded message:
> > From: LeJav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: October 23, 2008 4:10:25 AM EDT
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: [Bacula-users] Unlimited Retention
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Here is my problem: I want
FYI
Begin forwarded message:
> From: LeJav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: October 23, 2008 4:10:25 AM EDT
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Bacula-users] Unlimited Retention
>
> Hello,
>
> Here is my problem: I want to backup my system with normal strategy
> (full every week, incremental, retenti
