Re: [Bacula-devel] Improvements for const-correctness

2009-11-16 Thread SF Markus Elfring
> What did you have in mind for an "adjustment" -- it is hard to comment > without > knowing just what you are proposing. I propose to add "const" here, too. I am trying to find out which places were forgotten in the source code to be marked for read-only usage. I would like to clarify the dat

Re: [Bacula-devel] Improvements for const-correctness

2009-11-16 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 16 November 2009 18:08:13 SF Markus Elfring wrote: > Hello, > > I pointed out that some function interfaces are not const-correct so far. > http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1408 In general, I don't mind cleaning up the const correctness, but we are not terribly fanatic about it. We a

[Bacula-devel] Improvements for const-correctness

2009-11-16 Thread SF Markus Elfring
Hello, I pointed out that some function interfaces are not const-correct so far. http://bugs.bacula.org/view.php?id=1408 We have got different opinions on the effect that the addition of the key word "const" will have on the software design in several places of the source files. I would like to