Re: [Bacula-devel] Library names in 5.0.2

2010-05-18 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>It might have been better to update the name of the libraries in 5.0.2, but it >by no means something that is absolutely necessary. As far as I am aware, as >long as all the daemons on a single machine are of the same version, there is >absolutely no problem. Fair enough, I have an RH cluster

Re: [Bacula-devel] Library names in 5.0.2

2010-05-18 Thread Kern Sibbald
It might have been better to update the name of the libraries in 5.0.2, but it by no means something that is absolutely necessary. As far as I am aware, as long as all the daemons on a single machine are of the same version, there is absolutely no problem. On Tuesday 18 May 2010 23:03:55 Josep

[Bacula-devel] Library names in 5.0.2

2010-05-18 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I was looking through Mantis to track the lib name issue in the 5.0.2 rpm but didn't see it, is this simply getting fixed in next release or is there a patched srpm on route or patch file in existence? Thanks! jlc -- ___