Re: [Bacula-devel] baculum vs. bweb gui

2014-04-12 Thread Ondřej Garncarz
Furthermore, you can restrict your VirtualHost/Location/the whole Apache just to localhost, then create a SSH tunnel (e.g. ssh -CfNL 8000:localhost:80 server) and then access http://localhost:8000 on your computer. Dne 2014-04-12 18:34, Marcin Haba napsal: > Hello, > > In case of the Baculum,

Re: [Bacula-devel] baculum vs. bweb gui

2014-04-12 Thread Kern Sibbald
On 04/12/2014 05:59 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 04/12/14 04:29, Kern Sibbald wrote: >> The >> problem with bat is that it relies on Qt, which is forever changing and >> if you build it with the wrong version as most packagers do, it does not >> work well. In addition, despite the current diffi

Re: [Bacula-devel] baculum vs. bweb gui

2014-04-12 Thread Marcin Haba
Hello, In case of the Baculum, access to service is realized by web server. Access will be as secure as secure is your web server authentication. On web server level you can configure HTTPS access, non-standard web server port, IP addresses restrictions and other functions that provides a web ser

Re: [Bacula-devel] baculum vs. bweb gui

2014-04-12 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 04/12/14 04:29, Kern Sibbald wrote: > The > problem with bat is that it relies on Qt, which is forever changing and > if you build it with the wrong version as most packagers do, it does not > work well. In addition, despite the current difficulties of > installation, I am convinced that Web in

Re: [Bacula-devel] baculum vs. bweb gui

2014-04-12 Thread Kern Sibbald
To the community: Yes, I second Marcin: Baculum is a new Bacula web interface, and Marcin is enthusiastic to work on it. Since it is new, it may lack some features you want, but I am confident that will be corrected over time. To be 100% clear on bweb. It is still in use with the Bacula Enterpri

Re: [Bacula-devel] baculum vs. bweb gui

2014-04-11 Thread Marcin Haba
2014-04-12 1:00 GMT+02:00 Phil Stracchino : > On 04/11/14 18:59, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> Speaking of baculum ... what exactly *is* baculum? > > Doh. Never mind. If I were a little less overstressed right now, I > would have deduced that it is a replacement for bweb. Hi Phil, Yes, Baculum is a

Re: [Bacula-devel] baculum vs. bweb gui

2014-04-11 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 04/11/14 18:59, Phil Stracchino wrote: > Speaking of baculum ... what exactly *is* baculum? Doh. Never mind. If I were a little less overstressed right now, I would have deduced that it is a replacement for bweb. -- Phil Stracchino Babylon Communications ph...@caerllewys.net p...@c

Re: [Bacula-devel] baculum vs. bweb gui

2014-04-11 Thread Phil Stracchino
Speaking of baculum ... what exactly *is* baculum? It appears to be new in 7.0, but is not contained in Gentoo's app-backup/bacula-7.0.2 package. (I upgraded this morning; so far everything seems to be working smoothly.) I have one 5.2.5 Ubuntu client still left; Ubuntu hasn't updated yet. This

Re: [Bacula-devel] baculum vs. bweb gui

2014-04-08 Thread Marcin Haba
2014-04-02 23:33 GMT+02:00 Kern Sibbald : > On 04/02/2014 09:39 PM, Ulrich Leodolter wrote: >> Hello Kern, >> >> i have installed new baculum gui and played a little bit. >> first i tried it to install a location /baculum, but it seems >> it can only be installed at document root /, hopefully this

Re: [Bacula-devel] baculum vs. bweb gui

2014-04-02 Thread Kern Sibbald
On 04/02/2014 09:39 PM, Ulrich Leodolter wrote: > Hello Kern, > > i have installed new baculum gui and played a little bit. > first i tried it to install a location /baculum, but it seems > it can only be installed at document root /, hopefully this > can be made configurable in one of the next rel

[Bacula-devel] baculum vs. bweb gui

2014-04-02 Thread Ulrich Leodolter
Hello Kern, i have installed new baculum gui and played a little bit. first i tried it to install a location /baculum, but it seems it can only be installed at document root /, hopefully this can be made configurable in one of the next releases. i have still installed bweb from 5.2.13 on my web