On Saturday 15 November 2008 10:38:58 rgh wrote:
> Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > Le Friday 14 November 2008 17:20:59 Kern Sibbald, vous avez écrit :
> >> If we can automate the make_def script so that it really works (I just
> >> cut and pass the appropriate output into the real .def file) then that
>
Eric Bollengier wrote:
> Le Friday 14 November 2008 17:20:59 Kern Sibbald, vous avez écrit :
>> If we can automate the make_def script so that it really works (I just cut
>> and pass the appropriate output into the real .def file) then that would
>> even be better.
>
> I think that the dlltool fr
On Friday 14 November 2008 20:42:08 Eric Bollengier wrote:
> Le Friday 14 November 2008 17:20:59 Kern Sibbald, vous avez écrit :
> > On Thursday 13 November 2008 21:21:50 Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > > Hello Ricardo,
> > >
> > > Don't you think that a simple script can do the work and generate the
>
Le Friday 14 November 2008 17:20:59 Kern Sibbald, vous avez écrit :
> On Thursday 13 November 2008 21:21:50 Eric Bollengier wrote:
> > Hello Ricardo,
> >
> > Don't you think that a simple script can do the work and generate the def
> > file before linking dlls and binaries ?
> >
> > The existing ma
On Thursday 13 November 2008 21:21:50 Eric Bollengier wrote:
> Hello Ricardo,
>
> Don't you think that a simple script can do the work and generate the def
> file before linking dlls and binaries ?
>
> The existing make_def doesn't work well, but with some information about
> how get the symbol nam
Hello Ricardo,
Don't you think that a simple script can do the work and generate the def file
before linking dlls and binaries ?
The existing make_def doesn't work well, but with some information about how
get the symbol name from the object file, i can do it without changing all
the code and
