Hello Sven,
On 2020-12-06 18:21, Sven Hartge wrote:
> Hello!
>
> When trying to import the new 11.0.0 release into Debian our tooling
> complains about it not being signed by the correct key.
>
> Until now, every release was signed by the key from
> https://blog.bacula.org/downloads/Bacula-40
On 07.12.20 09:10, Eric Bollengier via Bacula-devel wrote:
You are a little bit too fast, and I'm a little bit too slow :-) I hope
it will be solved in the next days.
The Debian Tracker for Bacula warned me, that a new relese was ...
released and thus I started the packaging process, hitting
So I presume it safe to infer that 11.0 is a MAJOR update?
I'll pull it and do a test build on Solaris 11.
--
Phil Stracchino
Babylon Communications
ph...@caerllewys.net
p...@co.ordinate.org
Landline: +1.603.293.8485
Mobile: +1.603.998.6958
__
On 12/7/20 10:15 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> So I presume it safe to infer that 11.0 is a MAJOR update?
>
> I'll pull it and do a test build on Solaris 11.
...except I need to pull from a different target, right? Someone wnat
to give me a pointer here?
--
Phil Stracchino
Babylon Communi
On 07.12.20 16:15, Phil Stracchino wrote:
So I presume it safe to infer that 11.0 is a MAJOR update?
Yes, it is.
Grüße,
Sven.
___
Bacula-devel mailing list
Bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-deve
On 07.12.20 16:23, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 12/7/20 10:15 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
So I presume it safe to infer that 11.0 is a MAJOR update?
I'll pull it and do a test build on Solaris 11.
...except I need to pull from a different target, right? Someone wnat
to give me a pointer here?
Hello,
On 2020-12-07 16:32, Sven Hartge wrote:
> On 07.12.20 16:23, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> On 12/7/20 10:15 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>>> So I presume it safe to infer that 11.0 is a MAJOR update?
>
>>> I'll pull it and do a test build on Solaris 11.
>>
>> ...except I need to pull from a diff
