Andrew Paterson wrote:
Hi,
I am considering upgrading from 1.34.6 to 1.36.3 and am (double!)
checking the required DB updates.
It appears that the Database schema follows its own versioning independent of
the bacula source code
(seems sensible).
I conclude that I am running a Version 7
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Monday 16 May 2005 11:25, Russell Howe wrote:
/servicehelper, which looks to mean Display pretty system tray icon.
No, see below.
OK, I had misconceptions about the /servicehelper switch.
/servicehelper is an old artifact that should not be used, unless you want to
tir, 17,.05.2005 kl. 11.50 +0200, skrev Kern Sibbald:
Hello,
Notwithstanding my previous remarks about spam, I have noticed that there is
more and more on this list. After thinking about it for a while, I can
implement a script that automatically rejects all email by nonsubscribed
users
Hi Danie,
I'm upgrading bacula on Solaris so no RPM's.
I install the source (from the tar file) do a ./configure etc to build it.
But that's another story!
I probably can't help you much because I'm trying to be VERY careful since
I'm trying to upgrade a live network set-up.
Anyway what
Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 11:37, Russell Howe wrote:
Removing the key certainly
stops the warning messages being logged when users log in via terminal
services.
Well, this is a big surprise. If this is all that it takes to correct the
problem, first it is easy enough to
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 12:18, Christoph Haas wrote:
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:50:20AM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
So, what I am suggesting as a *possibility* is:
- Modify the bacula-users (and probably bacula-devel) list to be
subscriber only.
- Nightly purge all email held for
Kern,
I vote for the subscriber only list.
Generally speaking I do not subscribe to lists due to all the volume,
but this seems like a pretty good lists, I have gotten many more
questions resolved just by being subscribed, than posting to the forums
and checking every few days or so.
In this case
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:54:39PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 12:18, Christoph Haas wrote:
Can't you just set 'generic_nonmember_action' to 'reject'? That's what I
do with my mailman lists. It just rejects emails from non-subscribers
without administrative
You have to tell it to mount a tape.
just issue the mount command from the bconsole and it will start going.
-
Thank you,
Grant Della Vecchia
System Administrator
~
A I S M e d i a , I n c . - We Build eBusinesses
7000 Central Parkway, Suite 1700
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:02:54AM +0200, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
is there any mailman option or extension that
could implement a challange / response system?
(like most mailing lists have for subscription)
that would allow users to read the mailing list via
gmane and post directly to it
Henry Yen wrote:
The two opposing positions are:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html
I have no particular opinion one way or another, but popular sentiment
(including mailman's default settings) very much favor the first of the
Hello,
I get a good number of requests to change the list behavior to mung the
Reply-To. It might perhaps help me avoid getting two copies of most emails I
send that get answered, and help those that forget to use the Respond to
all, but as the first of the articles points out, it can create
Hello,
BackupPC uses *lots* and *lots* of hard links. The current Bacula
implementation is *very* slow handling hard links. You have three choices:
- Live with slow performance for BackupPC files
- Turn off handling of hard links (your BackupPC files will all be restored
but not properly
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 14:42, Henry Yen wrote:
Unfortunately, the ISP where I work receives thousands of bogus
challenge e-mails, due to (trivially) forged headers. These are
effectively just as bad as spam.
Challenge-Reponse systems, in the short term, do not stop spam,
but merely gate it
How do I set bacula to overwrite all tapes. I just want to do full
backups every night and not worry about what tape the user has put in.
Thanks.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 16:36, Jo wrote:
Henry Yen wrote:
The two opposing positions are:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html
I have no particular opinion one way or another, but popular sentiment
(including mailman's
Hi,
well, as Andrew asked for my advice specifically ;-)
Andrew Paterson wrote:
Hi Danie,
I'm upgrading bacula on Solaris so no RPM's.
I install the source (from the tar file) do a ./configure etc to build it.
Actually, that's the way I do things as well... although I could use
rpms, I
Hi.
Jeff Ramen wrote:
I would like to gain some understanding as to what bacula is doing when
the bytes written
stops changing and files examined keeps increasing.
It's probably examining files. Like during an incremental or
differential backup. The SD looks at all files on the computer, but
Hello,
Matthew Scarrow wrote:
How do I set bacula to overwrite all tapes. I just want to do full
backups every night and not worry about what tape the user has put in.
Well, this is a topic that has been discussed before.
In my opinion there are three things to consider:
1. That is generally not a
Hi,
Anybody ever had that error?
17-May 16:43 mustang-dir: Start Restore Job RestoreFiles.2005-05-17_16.43.13
17-May 16:45 mustang-sd: Ready to read from volume tape1 on device
/dev/sa0.
17-May 16:45 mustang-sd: Forward spacing to file:block 3:0.
17-May 16:52 mustang-sd: End of Volume at file 3
Hi all,
I have two identical Win 2k3 servers (Dell PowerEdge 2800, U320 RAID5,
dual P4 Xeon 2.8) that I need to backup data onto an FC3 server running
Bacula (P4 2.8GHz, USB2 HDD). All three machines have Gigabit cards
running on a Gigabit switch with appropriate Cat5e cables.
Server1 has two
Well, not really in the news, but here's someone talking about it:
http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-
0.html?forumID=90amp;threadID=173955amp;start=0
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference - http://www.bsdcan.org/
NEW brochure available at
On 17 May 2005 at 22:42, Dan Langille wrote:
Well, not really in the news, but here's someone talking about it:
http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-
0.html?forumID=90amp;threadID=173955amp;start=0
Sorry, bad URL, try this instead, with instead of amp;
Hello,
I'm trying to get a better understanding of Concurrent Job behaviour and
how it relates to multiple jobs going to a single Storage Device.
The basics of my setup are multiple clients and a single Storage device.
I specify that all Jobs will be spooled and that there is a Maximum
24 matches
Mail list logo
