Hello!
Just to note that this problem still exists in bacula-1.36.3...
Is anybody working on console ACL support?
Thanks!
- Forwarded message from Dmitry Sivachenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Dmitry Sivachenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Thu, 7 A
Hi,
Gabriel Latour schrieb:
> Anybody ever had that error?
Yes. I my case this happend because I selected the wrong storage.
--
Felix
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in
Hello,
I'm trying to get a better understanding of Concurrent Job behaviour and
how it relates to multiple jobs going to a single Storage Device.
The basics of my setup are multiple clients and a single Storage device.
I specify that all Jobs will be spooled and that there is a Maximum
Concurre
On 17 May 2005 at 22:42, Dan Langille wrote:
> Well, not really in the news, but here's someone talking about it:
>
> http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-
> 0.html?forumID=90&threadID=173955&start=0
Sorry, bad URL, try this instead, with & instead of &
http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-
0
Well, not really in the news, but here's someone talking about it:
http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-6230-
0.html?forumID=90&threadID=173955&start=0
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
BSDCan - The Technical BSD Conference - http://www.bsdcan.org/
NEW brochure available at http://www.bsd
Hi all,
I have two identical Win 2k3 servers (Dell PowerEdge 2800, U320 RAID5,
dual P4 Xeon 2.8) that I need to backup data onto an FC3 server running
Bacula (P4 2.8GHz, USB2 HDD). All three machines have Gigabit cards
running on a Gigabit switch with appropriate Cat5e cables.
Server1 has two fi
Hi,
Anybody ever had that error?
17-May 16:43 mustang-dir: Start Restore Job RestoreFiles.2005-05-17_16.43.13
17-May 16:45 mustang-sd: Ready to read from volume "tape1" on device
/dev/sa0.
17-May 16:45 mustang-sd: Forward spacing to file:block 3:0.
17-May 16:52 mustang-sd: End of Volume at file 3
> On Tue, 17 May 2005 15:20:53 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
David> I'm using bacula 1.36.3 on a linux machine (server) and on a windows
2000
David> fd-client.
David> I've got a strange but very annoying problem: during a backup of the
David> windows 2000 station, sometimes, the ne
Hello,
Matthew Scarrow wrote:
How do I set bacula to overwrite all tapes. I just want to do full
backups every night and not worry about what tape the user has put in.
Well, this is a topic that has been discussed before.
In my opinion there are three things to consider:
1. That is generally not a
Hi,
I don't will like to receive the bacula-users lists.
Thank very much!
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software developer in space?
Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes!
http://ads.osdn.
Hi.
Jeff Ramen wrote:
I would like to gain some understanding as to what bacula is doing when
the bytes written
stops changing and files examined keeps increasing.
It's probably examining files. Like during an incremental or
differential backup. The SD looks at all files on the computer, but
sto
Hi,
well, as Andrew asked for my advice specifically ;-)
Andrew Paterson wrote:
Hi Danie,
I'm upgrading bacula on Solaris so no RPM's.
I install the source (from the tar file) do a ./configure etc to build it.
Actually, that's the way I do things as well... although I could use
rpms, I sti
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 16:36, Jo wrote:
> Henry Yen wrote:
> >The two opposing positions are:
> > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> > http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html
> >
> >I have no particular opinion one way or another, but popular sentiment
> >(including
How do I set bacula to overwrite all tapes. I just want to do full
backups every night and not worry about what tape the user has put in.
Thanks.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes
Want to be the first software deve
>I can
> implement a script that automatically rejects all email by
> nonsubscribed
> users (it also rejects all other email held for
> administrative approval).
Every other significant mailing list I work with has this requirement to
serve it's subscribers, and it's the accepted practice. Uns
I would like to gain some understanding as to what bacula is doing when
the bytes written
stops changing and files examined keeps increasing.
Is this a cataloging operation?
Backuppc supports some kind of archiving feature, I wonder if anyone has
used this in conjunction with
bacula...
Thanks
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 14:42, Henry Yen wrote:
> Unfortunately, the ISP where I work receives thousands of bogus
> challenge e-mails, due to (trivially) forged headers. These are
> effectively just as bad as spam.
>
> Challenge-Reponse systems, in the short term, do not stop spam,
> but merely gat
Hello,
BackupPC uses *lots* and *lots* of hard links. The current Bacula
implementation is *very* slow handling hard links. You have three choices:
- Live with slow performance for BackupPC files
- Turn off handling of hard links (your BackupPC files will all be restored
but not properly link
Hello,
I get a good number of requests to change the list behavior to "mung" the
Reply-To. It might perhaps help me avoid getting two copies of most emails I
send that get answered, and help those that forget to use the "Respond to
all", but as the first of the articles points out, it can cre
Henry Yen wrote:
The two opposing positions are:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/reply-to-useful.html
I have no particular opinion one way or another, but popular sentiment
(including mailman's default settings) very much favor the first of the tw
On Tue, 17 May 2005, Henry Yen wrote:
Moreover, other closed lists that I'm on occasionally get spam from
listmembers whose machines are compromised (100.00% windows 'bots, so far).
Or mail forged to be from list members - the actual checking is fairly
dain bramaged in almost all lists and relies
Ivan,
I would say any responsible admin has similar problems, which is why
most that I know of use IMAP so they can use (if nothing else) webmail
to get their mail no matter where they are...
Sorry to digress :(
-
Thank you,
Grant Della Vecchia
System Administrator
Hello all,
On a fresh install of bacula, the following leads to a crash :
- do some backup
- edit bacula-dir.conf to add some files
- restart bacula-dir
results in this error (seen from bconsole):
*status dir
Using default Catalog name=MyCatalog DB=bacula
Could not open database "bacula".
sqlit
Kern & co.,
I, too, vote to keep the status quo because I would personally be
affected by the proposed restriction to the lists.
My subscription goes to address A where mail gets forwards to address
B or C or ... depending on where I am at the time. If I need to make a
posting, I would do it from
Hi all,
I'm using bacula 1.36.3 on a linux machine (server) and on a windows 2000
fd-client.
I've got a strange but very annoying problem: during a backup of the
windows 2000 station, sometimes, the network freezes: no access anymore
On the server, the job is still in "running state", but the wi
Quoting Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hello,
>
> Notwithstanding my previous remarks about spam, I have noticed that there is
> more and more on this list. After thinking about it for a while, I can
> implement a script that automatically rejects all email by nonsubscribed
> users (it al
Hello,
I am experiencing slow backup performance, especially when backing up
my BackupPC pool to tape.
My system:
Dual Opteron 2.4Ghz 1GB Ram, 4*300GB SATA (3Ware Controller RAID 5),
Adaptec U160
Gentoo Linux (stage 1 install) kernel: linux-2.6.11-gentoo-r6
BackupPC version 2.1.1, poo
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:02:54AM +0200, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> is there any mailman option or extension that
> could implement a challange / response system?
> (like most mailing lists have for subscription)
>
> that would allow users to read the mailing list via
> gmane and post directly
On 17 May 2005 at 13:30, Jo wrote:
> While we're at it. It would be nice to have the reply-to field set to
> the list where the mail came from and not to the person who sent the
> mail. Even though I switched to a mail client that has a send to all
> button, I constantly forget that I have to p
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:30:56AM +0200, Jo wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
>
> >So, what I am suggesting as a *possibility* is:
> >- Modify the bacula-users (and probably bacula-devel) list to be subscriber
> >only.
> >
> >What I don't like about this is that some users (such as myself) don't want
You have to tell it to mount a tape.
just issue the mount command from the bconsole and it will start going.
-
Thank you,
Grant Della Vecchia
System Administrator
~
A I S M e d i a , I n c . - "We Build eBusinesses"
7000 Central Parkway, Suite 1700
Atlan
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 01:54:39PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 May 2005 12:18, Christoph Haas wrote:
> > Can't you just set 'generic_nonmember_action' to 'reject'? That's what I
> > do with my mailman lists. It just rejects emails from non-subscribers
> > without administrative inter
Kern,
I vote for the subscriber only list.
Generally speaking I do not subscribe to lists due to all the volume,
but this seems like a pretty good lists, I have gotten many more
questions resolved just by being subscribed, than posting to the forums
and checking every few days or so.
In this case
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 12:18, Christoph Haas wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:50:20AM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > So, what I am suggesting as a *possibility* is:
> > - Modify the bacula-users (and probably bacula-devel) list to be
> > subscriber only.
> > - Nightly purge all email held for ad
Hello,
i will try to explain more clearly.
I need msi package from winbacula 1.36.2 or 1.36.3 installation for Active
Directory deploying. So i asked maybe someone has already did it and can send
me msi package? Or maybe someone can create msi package, because i don't have
such skills and time
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 May 2005 11:37, Russell Howe wrote:
>>Removing the key certainly
>>stops the warning messages being logged when users log in via terminal
>>services.
>
> Well, this is a big surprise. If this is all that it takes to correct the
> problem, first it is easy eno
Hi,
I knew I'd missed something important (& obvious!).
On reaching the situation where I have two bacula directories in /etc:
/etc/bacula_1.34.6 & /etc/bacula_1.36.3
I then need to copy/merge my config files from
1.34.6 to 1.36.3.
I say merge baecause I understand there are changes in the config
Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
Notwithstanding my previous remarks about spam, I have noticed that there is
more and more on this list. After thinking about it for a while, I can
implement a script that automatically rejects all email by nonsubscribed
users (it also rejects all other email held for
Hi Danie,
I'm upgrading bacula on Solaris so no RPM's.
I install the source (from the tar file) do a ./configure etc to build it.
But that's another story!
I probably can't help you much because I'm trying to be VERY careful since
I'm trying to upgrade a live network set-up.
Anyway what
is there any mailman option or extension that
could implement a challange / response system?
(like most mailing lists have for subscription)
that would allow users to read the mailing list via
gmane and post directly to it - after confirming the
challange mail - without the hassle of subscribing
(
tir, 17,.05.2005 kl. 11.50 +0200, skrev Kern Sibbald:
> Hello,
>
> Notwithstanding my previous remarks about spam, I have noticed that there is
> more and more on this list. After thinking about it for a while, I can
> implement a script that automatically rejects all email by nonsubscribed
>
On Tue, May 17, 2005 at 11:50:20AM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> So, what I am suggesting as a *possibility* is:
> - Modify the bacula-users (and probably bacula-devel) list to be subscriber
> only.
> - Nightly purge all email held for administrative approval -- i.e. all emails
> from nonsubscribe
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 11:37, Russell Howe wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Monday 16 May 2005 11:25, Russell Howe wrote:
> >>/servicehelper, which looks to mean "Display pretty system tray icon".
> >
> > No, see below.
>
> OK, I had misconceptions about the /servicehelper switch.
>
> > /service
Hello,
Notwithstanding my previous remarks about spam, I have noticed that there is
more and more on this list. After thinking about it for a while, I can
implement a script that automatically rejects all email by nonsubscribed
users (it also rejects all other email held for administrative app
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Monday 16 May 2005 11:25, Russell Howe wrote:
>
>>/servicehelper, which looks to mean "Display pretty system tray icon".
>
> No, see below.
OK, I had misconceptions about the /servicehelper switch.
> /servicehelper is an old artifact that should not be used, unless you
Hello !
Is it somehow possible that the Storage Daemon connects to the Client File Daemon to fetch
the files?
I've a network seperated with a firewall in several VLANs. My tapestation (storage daemon)
is in the "inner" vlan, several servers are in the DMZ. I dont want to open for every
server o
Andrew Paterson wrote:
Hi,
I am considering upgrading from 1.34.6 to 1.36.3 and am (double!)
checking the required DB updates.
It appears that the Database schema follows its own versioning independent of
the bacula source code
(seems sensible).
I conclude that I am running a Version 7 da
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
maybe someone has bacula 1.36.2 or 1.36.3 msi package? It would be very
>>nice to have it. Maybe someone is already builded such packages. I need
it for easier user maintance.
What do you mean easier? Do you want to deploy bacul
48 matches
Mail list logo
