[Bacula-users] recover from connection loss?

2005-06-05 Thread Timm Reinstorf
Hi all, since this is my first post to this list, let me first thank you a lot for developing/supporting this nice software bacula! I am a bacula newbie and just started to use it doing backups of my home systems. My question is, if it is generally possible for the file-daemon to recover

Re: [Bacula-users] recover from connection loss?

2005-06-05 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hello, Timm Reinstorf wrote: Hi all, ... My question is, if it is generally possible for the file-daemon to recover from a lost network connection during a backup job. Yes, but this takes a while. Default timeout is two hours. There are reasons for that long timeout period, but don't ask

Re: [Bacula-users] recover from connection loss?

2005-06-05 Thread Timm Reinstorf
Hello, thanks for your answers. Arno Lehmann wrote: 3) the backup was done to tapes. Is it possible to reclaim the space used by the now aborted job, without loosing data on the tape from previous jobs? In theory this is possible in one certain case. Bacula itself doesn't support this,

[Bacula-users] Getting Restore OK -- warning file count mismatch

2005-06-05 Thread Marko Fritzsche
Hi, I set up Bacula with the following configuration: Linux (Director, Storage ...) (BLNX02) Windows 2000 (client) (BBERLIN) Backup of the windows client is working fine: +---+-+-+--+---+--+-+---+ | JobId | Name

[Bacula-users] Getting Restore OK -- warning file count mismatch

2005-06-05 Thread Marko Fritzsche
Hi, I set up Bacula with the following configuration: Linux (Director, Storage ...) (BLNX02) Windows 2000 (client) (BBERLIN) Backup of the windows client is working fine: +---+-+-+--+---+--+-+---+ | JobId | Name

Re: [Bacula-users] recover from connection loss?

2005-06-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Sunday 05 June 2005 14:52, Arno Lehmann wrote: Hello, Timm Reinstorf wrote: Hi all, ... My question is, if it is generally possible for the file-daemon to recover from a lost network connection during a backup job. Yes, but this takes a while. Default timeout is two hours. There

[Bacula-users] Re: Wrong behaviour (?) of bacula 1.36.3

2005-06-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 23 May 2005 12:27, Roland Arendes wrote: Hi List, Kern, Bacula is running very well without any problems since a few months on an old Primergy N200 combined with an autochanger of Exabyte (1 LTO1 Drive, 10 Slots). On May 21st it happened to me that the tape that was inserted from

[Bacula-users] possible bug in 1.36.3 ???

2005-06-05 Thread Andrei Mikhailovsky
Hello bacula users. I've been recently testing bacula and found a strange thing. Bacula doesn't seems to recognise the full backup. I've done the full backup yesterday (first time since the install). Today, it should perform an incremental backup, but it started doing the full one again. Here is

Re: [Bacula-users] possible bug in 1.36.3 ???

2005-06-05 Thread Angus Jordan
Don't setup two seperate jobs to do this. Simply change which pool is used for differential (or incremental) backups in the Schedule section of the director configuration. Example: Schedule { Name = NightlySave Run = Level=Full Pool=Fulls mon at 01:05 Run = Level=Differential Pool=Diffs