Hi all ,
Hope you are doing fine .
Can some one helpe in my issue
:
the problem is ,icreated the
rescuse CD and when i am trying to use it i follow the mop but
the script ./start_networkdoese not work it gave me " dev
unknown host " ( so i used the other one created n /etc directory and
Hi,
Ross Boylan wrote:
...
That's very kind. I have progressed enough so that I can see the
construct I used,
${blankv:-${seqno+}:p/4/0/r}
seems to be working. (There are other problems, but I don't think
caused by this).
Well, I played around a bit with variables... unfortunately, it's
Hello,
Ross Boylan wrote:
I restarted the sd demon, and it solved the problem. A few questions
appear below.
... I'm still at the experimental phase.
Speaking of which, when I finally stop mucking around, what's the best
way to cleanup. I see delete and purge commands. It's hard to
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 21:32, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
Richard White wrote:
It may be that the answer to this question is in the pdf manual and I am
just too blind to see it. If so, please just point me to the right page
or heading.
It's not that easy... you'll have to search the
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 22:25, Kern Sibbald wrote:
*estimate job=Backup lech system
Connecting to Client lech-fd at lech:9102
2000 OK estimate files=38800 bytes=2,149,638,554
The building of the directory tree took about 10 minutes.
No memory tree is built for the estimate command only
I have a value for Maximum Spool Size in the Device resource in
bacula-sd.conf, which probably explains why bacula only spools again after
de-spooling to tape.
I was just wondering if there is a feature / combination that will allow
bacula to spool again while it is de-spooling the previous
On Thursday 23 June 2005 07:31, Stephan Holl wrote:
Hello Ross,
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 11:43:27 -0700 Ross Boylan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 04:50:50PM +0200, Stephan Holl wrote:
Dear List,
I would like to write a bootstrap for every job and every client I
On Tuesday 21 June 2005 13:25, Sebastian Stark wrote:
Will splitting up bacula-dir.conf into several files lead to bacula
seeing new FileSets and upgrading to Full backups next run? If I
don't change anything else of course.
I don't think so. If you want Bacula to pick up any changes,
I think
I have worked around my problem with raw LVM2 partition backups.
FYI, I am doing this to backup my BackupPC pool, which resides entirely
on a LVM2 partition. This is
substantially faster then trying to do a file backup of the BackupPC
pool, due to the hard link handling
in bacula. The space
I have install bacula 1.36.3. Configured bacula however I still
get the same error:
23-Jun 11:33 bacula-dir: Warning:
23-Jun 11:33 bacula-dir: Warning: WARNING The Internal
Database is NOT OPERATIONAL!
23-Jun 11:33 bacula-dir: Warning: You should use SQLite,
PostgreSQL, or
I totally agree to Dominc, but things that i discovered is that director
sometimes hangs after running reload but that's not reproducable.
best regards,
chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dominic Marks
Sent: Wednesday,
On Thursday 23 June 2005 05:59 am, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Now is *really* the time for people to start trying Python -- there are
still problems (a few memory leaks), and certainly much more to implement
to make it really useful. What I hope is to be able to provide a certain
minimum set of
I'm interested in this also. Perhaps a Minimum Spool Size directive so that
the spool reaches a critical size to avoid shoe shining tapes, and once that
size is reached the storage daemon starts de-spooling from the beginning of
the spool file to the tape while still writing data from the file
On Thursday 23 June 2005 15:50, Misty Stanley-Jones wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2005 05:59 am, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Now is *really* the time for people to start trying Python -- there are
still problems (a few memory leaks), and certainly much more to implement
to make it really useful. What
On Thursday 23 June 2005 16:08, Sebastian Stark wrote:
I meant something different.
If I change a fileset then bacula will upgrade the next job to a full
backup for consistency reasons. That's documented behaviour and has nothing
to do with the reload command.
Now my question is: How does
Some Linux book I was reading suggested running generic
(dump, tar, whatever) DR backups in single-user mode to minimize open file
issues. Do Bacula users see that as a worthwhile approach, or should I
spend my time thinking about more important things, like when will lunch be
ready?
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Now is *really* the time for people to start trying Python -- there
are still
FYI, 3 things are holding me back:
1. Not packaged for Debian.
2. Not documented.
3. counters unavailable (though if it's python, I suppose one could
If I allow multiple concurrent jobs in bacula and I enable data spooling
before going to tape, is there a way to ensure that only one job is
written to each volume at a time? Basically I want each job to go onto
the tape in order, to prevent intermixed data. Is this taken care of
automagically?
Arno,
In my case that hopefully wouldn't be too much of a problem -- Director
and SD on the same machine with local SCSI tape.
I like your idea of a CD boot, but it wouldn't allow me to make the
operation lights-out (I could script going to RL1, backup, and reboot to
RL3 -- I think :-).
But it
On Thursday 23 June 2005 18:02, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Now is *really* the time for people to start trying Python -- there
are still
FYI, 3 things are holding me back:
1. Not packaged for Debian.
I doubt that it will be packaged
Hi,
Dan Langille wrote:
...
As you can see, the email message being composed was too large. I'm
quite sure this is a limitation imposed by my mail server
configuration. I do not want to alter that. I want to supress the
'New file:' messages. I don't see anything related to 'new file' at
Dan,
Dan Langille wrote:
Don't know, but if everything else fails write a small wrapper for bsmtp
which filters away all New file: lines - would be easy enough with grep,
sed, or perl or whtever you prefer...
Good idea.Trying that now.
I also want to get rid of it from the console...
On Friday 24 June 2005 13:54, Dan Langille wrote:
2) Also ... I thought that running a job manually from the console
allows you to exit from the console and the job will still run in the
background. Obviosly I was wrong
No, you aren't wrong.
... as the job was cancelled when I exited
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 09:13:36PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
On Thursday 23 June 2005 18:02, Ross Boylan wrote:
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:59:22PM +0200, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Now is *really* the time for people to start trying Python -- there
are still
FYI, 3 things are holding me
24 matches
Mail list logo
