On Friday 09 December 2005 20:44, Landon Fuller wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > On Friday 09 December 2005 09:00, Davide Bolcioni wrote:
> >>Kern Sibbald wrote:
> >>>The current "production" release is Bacula version 1.38.2. Between the
> >>>time it was released (22 November 2005) and now, there
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 03:19:10PM -0500, Angelo Bertolli wrote:
> Is there any way to remove this dependency on the bootstrap file by
> prepending meta-data to the volumes themselves? Assuming that
> everything on the volumes is "safe" and the rest of your systems get
> destroyed, how can you
I'm sort of new to bacula, so I might be totally off on this but... from
what I understand is that the catalog (database) keeps track of jobs,
which is important for where to find information about files that were
backed up. Then if you lose your catalog, you can recreate it using
the bootstr
Kern Sibbald wrote:
> On Friday 09 December 2005 09:00, Davide Bolcioni wrote:
>
>>Kern Sibbald wrote:
>>
>>>The current "production" release is Bacula version 1.38.2. Between the
>>>time it was released (22 November 2005) and now, there are a number of
>>>bugs that have been fixed, which some us
Please help... Im really at a loss here.
I've since tried resetting the Volstatus on my "purged" volumes to
"recycle" which did nothing.
According to the "recycling algorithm" in
http://www.bacula.org/rel-manual/Automatic_Volume_Recycling.html I
think it should be using the tapes but its not.
I wouldn't recommend that personally. A better choice is to edit your
/etc/ld.so.conf* (I think RH uses a .d directory) to make sure that's in
there, or to specify a location on the configure line. Mixing /usr/lib
and /usr/lib64 could be a problem down the line.
Pignedoli Luca wrote:
I have
On Friday 09 December 2005 13:47, Frank Sweetser wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:15:24AM +0100, Pignedoli Luca wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I want install Bacula on RHEL 4.
> > I have download and install file bacula-1.38.2-1.src.rpm, going into
> > /usr/src/redhat/SPECS and i run the command:
>
I have recompiled with define build_mysql 1 but the error returned me:
ld error:
can't find mysqlclient
I've create a symlink to dir /ust/lib64/mysql in /usr/lib/mysql and now
it works.
Thanks a lot.
Messaggio Originale
Da: Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: bacula-users@lis
On Friday 09 December 2005 11:40, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> > Scott is, unfortunately on a rather long assignment away from home, so
> > for the moment, there won't be any binary rpms. However, I have
> > release a source rpm for version 1.38.2 (and will do so for any new
> > release). Using this, y
On Friday 09 December 2005 10:51, Pignedoli Luca wrote:
> Ok, now me returns the following error:
>
> You have not specified either --enable-client-only or one of the
> supported databases: MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite3 or SQLite.
> This is not permitted. Please reconfigure.
Yea, not so nice :-( I
All-
Thanks to the help from several listers, I've gotten my autochanger
working and swapping tapes for me. This morning though, my
bacula-director crashed out on me while trying to back up my Redhat 6.2
server (it's totally stable with the 7 other clients I have). When I
tried to backup th
On 12/8/2005 5:18 PM David Raine wrote:
I know this has been mentioned in the past, but I can't find anything
other than Kern indicating that one should run through the tutorial
(which I've done).
Bacula 1.38.2 on debian sarge, LTO-1 tape drive
When tape tape-0002 fills, I get a request to m
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 15:38:55 +0200, "Timo Neuvonen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Timo> With no prior experience of building rpms (not counting the checkinstall
Timo> tool), I just made my first try... or actually the first ten and
something
Timo> tries ;-)
Timo> Yes, building rpm
With no prior experience of building rpms (not counting the checkinstall
tool), I just made my first try... or actually the first ten and something
tries ;-)
Yes, building rpms might belong to somewhere else in newsgroups hierarchy,
but maybe there is something Bacula-spesific anyway...
Started wi
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 13:32:13 -, "Scott Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Scott> Yeah there was an earlier error, but I thought the error message was
Scott> repeated at the end, i.e. the error was:
Scott> make[1]: *** No rule to make target `../lib/libbac.a', needed by
Sco
Yeah there was an earlier error, but I thought the error message was
repeated at the end, i.e. the error was:
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `../lib/libbac.a', needed by
`bacula-sd'. Stop.
However, I have to admit that compiler messages don't mean much to me.
-Original Message-
F
Ok thanks. :)
Messaggio Originale
Da: Frank Sweetser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: Pignedoli Luca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Oggetto: Re:[Bacula-users] RHEL 4 and Bacula 1.38.2
Data: 9/12/2005 13:47
>On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:15:24AM +0100, Pignedoli Luca wrote:
>
>
>>Hi all.
>>
>>I want
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:15:24AM +0100, Pignedoli Luca wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I want install Bacula on RHEL 4.
> I have download and install file bacula-1.38.2-1.src.rpm, going into
> /usr/src/redhat/SPECS and i run the command:
>
> # rpmbuild -bb bacula.spec --define "build_rhel4 1" --define
> "
> Scott is, unfortunately on a rather long assignment away from home, so
> for the moment, there won't be any binary rpms. However, I have
> release a source rpm for version 1.38.2 (and will do so for any new
> release). Using this, you can rather easily build your own rpms
> on any system. For
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 10:04:15 -, "Scott Simpson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Scott> I think I followed the installation instructions and I've RTM. I ran
Scott> configure thus (I've tried with and without the -02 compiler flag and
Scott> with and without --enable-static-tools):
I think I followed the installation
instructions and I've RTM. I ran configure thus (I've tried with and
without the -02 compiler flag and with and without
--enable-static-tools):
CFLAGS="-g -Wall -O2" ./configure \ --prefix=/usr \
--sbindir=/usr/sbin \ --sysconfdir=/etc/bacula \
--
Ok, now me returns the following error:
You have not specified either --enable-client-only or one of the
supported databases: MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite3 or SQLite.
This is not permitted. Please reconfigure.
Messaggio Originale
Da: Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: bacula-use
On Friday 09 December 2005 10:15, Pignedoli Luca wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I want install Bacula on RHEL 4.
> I have download and install file bacula-1.38.2-1.src.rpm, going into
> /usr/src/redhat/SPECS and i run the command:
>
> # rpmbuild -bb bacula.spec --define "build_rhel4 1" --define
> "build_mysq
On Friday 09 December 2005 09:20, Ribi Roland wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We need to archive yearly backups 5 years and schould be able to restore
> those tapes.
This *should* be possible providing you have good media, don't change tape
drives, and keep the same tape blocking.
>
> Can I read/restore old ta
Hi all.
I want install Bacula on RHEL 4.
I have download and install file bacula-1.38.2-1.src.rpm, going into
/usr/src/redhat/SPECS and i run the command:
# rpmbuild -bb bacula.spec --define "build_rhel4 1" --define
"build_mysql4 1"
but this command returned one error:
error: You must specify
I have the exact same here today with 1.38.0, needed to restart the SD
Adrian Close wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been chasing this one for a while, trying to be sure. It seems that:
>
> IF
> - Bacula is configured with separate pools for incremental and full
> backups,
>
> AND
> - an upgraded in
On Friday 09 December 2005 09:00, Davide Bolcioni wrote:
> Kern Sibbald wrote:
> > The current "production" release is Bacula version 1.38.2. Between the
> > time it was released (22 November 2005) and now, there are a number of
> > bugs that have been fixed, which some users might want to include
On Friday 09 December 2005 06:31, Adrian Close wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've been chasing this one for a while, trying to be sure. It seems that:
>
> IF
> - Bacula is configured with separate pools for incremental and full
> backups,
>
> AND
> - an upgraded incremental fails (e.g. client host offline)
Hi,
We need to archive yearly backups 5 years and schould be able to restore
those tapes.
Can I read/restore old tapes, written by old versions of bacula with a new
Version (1.36 to 1.38)?
How often are there changes to the format how bacula writes tapes?
Which settings of the storage deamon ar
Kern Sibbald wrote:
The current "production" release is Bacula version 1.38.2. Between the time
it was released (22 November 2005) and now, there are a number of bugs that
have been fixed, which some users might want to include in their system.
The problem is that these fixes are for the mo
30 matches
Mail list logo
