[Bacula-users] update bacula on debian3.1

2006-08-13 Thread stefan
Hello all, I installed bacula on debian 3.1. I want to backup to DVD and I raed that I have to use a newer version than the version debian is installing. I downloaded the tar.gz and want to compile. When I do ./configure --wtith-mysql then I get the error that mysql.h is not found and the script

Re: [Bacula-users] update bacula on debian3.1

2006-08-13 Thread Greg Vickers
Hi Stefan, stefan wrote: Hello all, I installed bacula on debian 3.1. I want to backup to DVD and I raed that I have to use a newer version than the version debian is installing. I downloaded the tar.gz and want to compile. When I do ./configure --wtith-mysql then I get the error that

Re: [Bacula-users] update bacula on debian3.1

2006-08-13 Thread stefan
Hi Greg, thanks for the fast and quick reply :) If I were you, I would use the Bacula package available off of the Backports web site: http://www.backports.org/ (Which I've just discovered is moving to a new web interface... which isn't finished yet... doh.) So here is what you should do:

Re: [Bacula-users] Filesystem change prohibited. why?

2006-08-13 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 18:13, Alan Brown wrote: On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Michel Meyers wrote: Those are mounted filesystems. Bacula will not descend into mounted filesystems unless you specifically tell it to. Unfortunately it also doesn't backup the mountpoint as a directory, which

Re: [Bacula-users] change request

2006-08-13 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 11 August 2006 22:59, Mike wrote: Testing bacula today (intending to go to production next week) on my backup server that has about 200G of data to backup as a full, when I execute 'status dir' in bconsole the large number of files and cumulative file sizes causes the report to shift

Re: [Bacula-users] High Availability Bacula - Multiple Catalogues - Pros/Cons?

2006-08-13 Thread Kern Sibbald
dbcheck is not a program for correcting corrupted databases. It will fix certain logical inconsistencies in Bacula database records and eliminate orphaned records (doing no harm other than wasting space). On Friday 11 August 2006 12:03, Dominic Marks wrote: All, Having had my first

Re: [Bacula-users] getting both error and success messages while testing tape with btape

2006-08-13 Thread Kern Sibbald
This is incorrect behavior (i.e. you should not get the MTWEOF error). It will *probably* work, but I wouldn't run my tape drive this way. It looks like Bacula is not seeing the logical end of tape marker, but is writing right to the physical end of the tape (very bad). Also, on a modern tape

Re: [Bacula-users] Kernel panic from Bacula recovery CDs

2006-08-13 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 10 August 2006 19:25, Faber J. Fedor wrote: Hi guys, Me and my guys have inherited a webserver running Debian 3.3.5 and bacula doing remote backups (the webserver is a bacula client). The previous admin left very little in the way of documentation so that is one of our first

Re: [Bacula-users] Filesystem change prohibited. why?

2006-08-13 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 22:29, Timo Neuvonen wrote: Marco Strullato wrote: hi all, do you know why I get Filesystem change prohibited when I run bacula? 08-Aug 16:40 DirectorServer: Start Backup JobId 95, Job=BackupShannon.2006-08-08_16.39.58 08-Aug 16:40 StorageServer:

Re: [Bacula-users] update bacula on debian3.1

2006-08-13 Thread Greg Vickers
Hi stefan, stefan wrote: Hi Greg, thanks for the fast and quick reply :) snip This is really good working. I also had to update the mysql database with ./update_mysql_tables_8_to_9 . So I had to download the tar.gz first. Is there another way to update the mysql DB? Hm, I'm not that

Re: [Bacula-users] change request

2006-08-13 Thread Mike
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, Kern Sibbald might have said: On Friday 11 August 2006 22:59, Mike wrote: Testing bacula today (intending to go to production next week) on my backup server that has about 200G of data to backup as a full, when I execute 'status dir' in bconsole the large number of