Hi, I just want to know if anyone has tried configuring a single
director with multiple SDs?
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events
Hi,
thank you all for your ideas.
@James
The idea of your client sounds very good. Seems to be a great plugin for
Exchange - perhaps sometime for MSSQL, too.
At the moment I'm not able to you use VSS because the operating system
is Windows 2000 Server an we are using MS SQL Server 2000, so
Hi.
I have. Works nicely.
--
Silver
On Friday 12 October 2007 09:41, Janco van der Merwe wrote:
Hi, I just want to know if anyone has tried configuring a single
director with multiple SDs?
-
This SF.net email is
We mostly use the Red-Hat Distro's i.e. Fedora, RHEL and CentOS
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 09:53 +0300, Silver Salonen wrote:
I don't know about that. I guess it's the question about your distribution
packages. I use FreeBSD and I can choose from its port (e.g. package) what to
build and what
I know it's actually incredible but is there a way of only compiling the
SD and FD binaries, reason why I'm asking is that in order to get the SD
installed I had to compile the entire Bacula which meant installing a
DB, not that its that big of an issue I was just wondering if there is
way or an
Hi,
12.10.2007 08:55,, Janco van der Merwe wrote::
I know it's actually incredible but is there a way of only compiling the
SD and FD binaries,
That's not really incredible...
reason why I'm asking is that in order to get the SD
installed I had to compile the entire Bacula which meant
On Friday 12 October 2007 10:42, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
12.10.2007 08:55,, Janco van der Merwe wrote::
I know it's actually incredible but is there a way of only compiling the
SD and FD binaries,
That's not really incredible...
reason why I'm asking is that in order to get the SD
i have also a second machine thats act as storage-daemon, to build only fd and
sd i do something like:
./configure --enable-client-only
make
make install
and now the sd:
cd src/cats
make
cd ../lib
make
cd ../stored
make
cp src/stored/bacula-sd /sbin
thats all.
second way:
search for
Hi group,
I'm using Bacula 2.2.4. Lately i've implemented Verify Jobs for my
tapes. I've noticed that a *Verify* changed the 'LastWritten'-time of the
tape (which seems very incorrect to me- a verify doesn't write on the
tape at all!).
The LastWritten-time also influences the expiretime of
On 12 Oct 2007 at 9:14, Silver Salonen wrote:
Hi!
Is there a reason why wx-console should use WX 2.4? Every time I start
upgrading bacula-client, I just set USE_WX=2.8 in bacula-server's
Makefile and it builds and works perfectly. I've also tried compiling
it with 2.6 and there wasn't any
Hello,
Hi,
11.10.2007 17:05,, Michel Meyers wrote::
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
11.10.2007 12:14,, GDS.Marshall wrote::
Is anyone using a Quantum Superloader 3 with Bacula? If so, do you
know
how to get bacula to eject the tape from the
Hi,
12.10.2007 11:13,, luyigui loholhlki wrote::
*//*
i've defined an hp-tape (8volumes) with auto changer but i've
plugged
just 7 volumes
the problem is that when the backup proccess arrives to the 8th
volume
(which doesnt exists) sends me msg with a
On Friday 12 October 2007 12:13, Dan Langille wrote:
On 12 Oct 2007 at 9:14, Silver Salonen wrote:
Hi!
Is there a reason why wx-console should use WX 2.4? Every time I start
upgrading bacula-client, I just set USE_WX=2.8 in bacula-server's
Makefile and it builds and works perfectly.
i've defined an hp-tape (8volumes) with auto changer but i've plugged
just 7 volumes
the problem is that when the backup proccess arrives to the 8th volume
(which doesnt exists) sends me msg with a problem
My question is : can u please tell how to declare an hp tape with just 7
On 12 Oct 2007 at 12:19, Silver Salonen wrote:
On Friday 12 October 2007 12:13, Dan Langille wrote:
On 12 Oct 2007 at 9:14, Silver Salonen wrote:
Hi!
Is there a reason why wx-console should use WX 2.4? Every time I
start upgrading bacula-client, I just set USE_WX=2.8 in
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 16:35 +0100, Gavin Hamill wrote:
Hi - I'm trying to determine a reasonable base before moving onto Bacula
itself... have a look at this, does it make sense?
HP /did/ sneak out a firmware update days before I wrote the original
mail. I upgraded, and also changed to 'random'
Hi there,
Firstly, thank you for getting back to me, and with such speed.
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
MaximumPartSize = 5000M;
That directive takes no effect, it's only used for DVD writing.
Ah!
The above looks good, provided the retention times and set volume
sizes fit, i.e. you
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
And I did as I said I will increase this limit,.
OK, I missed that bit/
Also, as I said, I remain very skeptical about sizes greater than 500K, and
there is even a certain amount of evidence from my own tests and from several
other users that
i have never used this feature, but now i need it.
i can confirm that bacula 2.2.5 (compiled from source on debian 4.0) has the
same problem with postgresql
catalog = all, !skipped, !saved
but i don't know if this is only a configuration problem
(the dird starts fine with that
Please mount Volume Tape-0008 on Storage Device Drive-1
(/dev/nst0) for Job
BackupMailSrv01.2007-10-11_22.00.00
If you want to use only 7 tapes and the 7 tapes you have in the
changer are all marked as Full you must allow bacula to automatically
recycle tapes or do this manually as bacula
On Friday 12 October 2007 15:18, Alan Brown wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
And I did as I said I will increase this limit,.
OK, I missed that bit/
Also, as I said, I remain very skeptical about sizes greater than 500K,
and there is even a certain amount of evidence from
Hello,
I am not sure if this is a bug or part of the design hence raising it here
first.
I have two jobs which start on day x, y and z
0300 job name1 priority a (high)
0605 job name2 priority b (low)
Job name1 overruns onto day y. Job name2 is still waiting for the higher
priority job name1
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Version 2.2.5 is a major bug fix release to version 2.2.4
- It fixes the following bugs: #961, 962, 963, 969, 968, 960,
964, (possibly 935 and 903), 953, 953, 967, 966, 965, 954,
957, 908, 958, and 955.
Looking at this, it appears you simply closed
On 12 Oct 2007 at 10:54, GDS.Marshall wrote:
Hello,
I am not sure if this is a bug or part of the design hence raising it
here first.
I have two jobs which start on day x, y and z
0300 job name1 priority a (high)
0605 job name2 priority b (low)
Job name1 overruns onto day y. Job
Hi All,
I'm having a hard time getting this right on our install here, so
wondered if anyone can advise what I'm doing wrong here.
Scenario is a dozen servers backing up to this server. I have a 333Gb
array for backing up to on /backups/bacula/
The problem is that I keep using up all of the disk
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007 08:55:12 +0200, Janco van der Merwe said:
I know it's actually incredible but is there a way of only compiling the
SD and FD binaries, reason why I'm asking is that in order to get the SD
installed I had to compile the entire Bacula which meant installing a
DB, not that
Hi,
12.10.2007 10:32,, Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote::
Hi,
since a few days I'm trying to migrate an existing backup
infrastructure to Bacula 2.2.4. I have the pleasure of a fairly
uniform OS landscape (mainly CentOS 5 with a few Fedora 7 and the odd
Windows XP box thrown in) and getting
Hi,
12.10.2007 09:47,, Silver Salonen wrote::
On Friday 12 October 2007 10:42, Arno Lehmann wrote:
...
But Bacula is the best written Software I have ever had the pleasure
(I leave this in to keep the mail on topic :-)
of
working with!!
You know what they (in
Hello,
12.10.2007 11:58,, Andy Brown wrote::
Hi All,
I'm having a hard time getting this right on our install here, so
wondered if anyone can advise what I'm doing wrong here.
Scenario is a dozen servers backing up to this server. I have a 333Gb
array for backing up to on /backups/bacula/
On Fri, 2007-10-12 at 13:03 +0200, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
12.10.2007 09:47,, Silver Salonen wrote::
On Friday 12 October 2007 10:42, Arno Lehmann wrote:
...
But Bacula is the best written Software I have ever had the pleasure
(I leave this in to keep the mail on topic :-)
of
Hello.
First of all, I use Bacula 2.2.4 on FreeBSD-6.1.
I've configured all the jobs with Max Wait Time = 12h - the idea of this was
that if a job has been waiting for storage or smth too long, it will be
cancelled, so that jobs that may have a longer wait time, may start running.
I've now
On Friday 12 October 2007 12:15, Alan Brown wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Version 2.2.5 is a major bug fix release to version 2.2.4
- It fixes the following bugs: #961, 962, 963, 969, 968, 960,
964, (possibly 935 and 903), 953, 953, 967, 966, 965, 954,
957, 908, 958,
Andy Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which shows the volume as purged but yet its still consuming disk space,
is this normal? Is there a way of telling it to null/zero the file?
To my experience volumes on a file storage will never be deleted by
bacula, only overwritten. If the volumestatus
Hi,
12.10.2007 14:48,, Andy Brown wrote::
Hi there,
Firstly, thank you for getting back to me, and with such speed.
You were lucky :-)
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
MaximumPartSize = 5000M;
That directive takes no effect, it's only used for DVD writing.
Ah!
The above looks good,
My apologies if this has a simple solution, but I couldn't find anything
with a (quick) search:
I've been running bacula 1.38.x for quite awhile and it's been
very nice, except for the massive amount of time the database
attr spooling takes - mine is huge due to the tremendous number of
files my
Hi,
Got my new AIT5 tape drive delivered today, did a firmware upgrade of the
autochanger and installed it alongside with the old AIT3 one. All btape tests
on the new drive completed with flying colors. Now I need advice on how to
configure Bacula for two drives which use different (and
On 10/12/07, Ivan Adzhubey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Got my new AIT5 tape drive delivered today, did a firmware upgrade of the
autochanger and installed it alongside with the old AIT3 one. All btape tests
on the new drive completed with flying colors. Now I need advice on how to
configure
On Fri, 12 Oct 2007, Arno Lehmann wrote:
Doh ! I knew it was simple ! I looked at the original package startup
scripts and they don't start the file daemon as user bacula. So my
single file restore seems to have worked just fine when the file daemon
runs as root.
I agree that sqlite is
Hi,
12.10.2007 22:03,, Dirk Kleinhesselink wrote::
My apologies if this has a simple solution, but I couldn't find anything
with a (quick) search:
I've been running bacula 1.38.x for quite awhile and it's been
very nice, except for the massive amount of time the database
attr spooling
Hi John,
On Friday 12 October 2007 04:13:40 pm John Drescher wrote:
On 10/12/07, Ivan Adzhubey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Got my new AIT5 tape drive delivered today, did a firmware upgrade of the
autochanger and installed it alongside with the old AIT3 one. All btape
tests on the new
Today while restoring, I got this:
12-Oct 14:38 adelie-sd: Ready to read from volume File-0037 on
device FileStorage (/backup/bacula).
12-Oct 14:38 adelie-sd: Forward spacing Volume File-0037 to file:block
0:970478039.
12-Oct 14:39 adelie-fd: RestoreFiles.2007-10-12_13.56.09 Error:
I'm using Bacula 2.2.3 and have a schedule that writes a full backup to
DVD on monday night followed by incrementals for the rest of the week.
The full backup runs OK and the next four incrementals run OK, but the
fifth incremental fails with the following error:
12-Oct 23:10 server-sd:
Hello,
Is anyone using tls with the latest bacula? I upgraded from 2.03 to
2.2.4 and the director now does not start. Both the file and storage daemons
do start, so i do not believe it's a tls issue. I've installed the latest
server on both FreeBSD via ports, and a CentOS 5 box, and i'm
I'm just beginning to use it this week, it appears to work out of the box
with 1.38 though.
Some details though, I'm using Xen, base os RHEL5 (32bit), domU where the
director and sd are is debian etch (stable). The machine is a new Dell 6850,
this is an LTO4 version connected with to a LSI logic
I'm running some tests, and as such, I'm not restoring to the system on which
the files were originally backed up. But when I get the report e-mails, in
the subject they say:
Bacula: Restore OK of machine-to-which-I'm-restoring Full
Granted, I'm restoring that the second machine's client, but
45 matches
Mail list logo
