Re: [Bacula-users] ProblemsstartingBacula aftercompilingandinstalling

2009-01-22 Thread Bruno Friedmann
Reynier Perez Mira wrote: With what you indicate it would be reasonable to launch the same flags I use. I've several quite identical pc running same spec with this compilation. ( ok on opensuse, not debian but this would normaly doesn't change a lot. ) Thanks a lot Bruno, I compile with

[Bacula-users] Bacula and Windows Vista 64Bit

2009-01-22 Thread KNOPS Manfred
Hello together, we installed bacula 2.4.4 win32 fileserver-deamon and console on a windows 64 bit system, called clapton. We use bacula 2.4.3 on a opensuse 11.0 system for bacula directory daemon and bacula storage daemon. We configured a job to backup the vista machine. Here the job

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula with opensolaris

2009-01-22 Thread Allan Black
bacula-us...@compulab-consult.de wrote: Does anybody have a howto which helps me to compile the current bacula version with opensolaris? At the moment I'm failing with missing mysql libs (even they are installed) during the configure process. You need the option --with-mysql=base-dir, where

Re: [Bacula-users] products based on bacula

2009-01-22 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Trouble is management these days in a lot of places doesn't know enough to make a decision other than on a cost or name basis. You'd expect if a person was unsure, they'd ask for a walkthrough or a synopsis, maybe with an extended trial period -- not

Re: [Bacula-users] New volumes put into Full status in succession from single backup

2009-01-22 Thread Win Htin
Problem resolved. The FC switch was acting up and due to that, the tape backups went crazy while doing FC path failover. Replaced the switch and everything is back to normal. Thanks! On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Win Htin win.h...@gmail.com wrote: I'm seeing st0: Error 1 (sugg. bt 0x0,

[Bacula-users] Retention period definitions clashing with scheduling definitions?

2009-01-22 Thread Foo
Hi, Just to make sure I've got this correct: Bacula does a simple calculation when parsing retention config options such as month=30 days*24 hours*60 minutes*60 seconds everywhere. An example: maximum volumes=3 (per pool) volume use duration=1 month volume retention=5 weeks file

[Bacula-users] Anyway to do multi-core compression?

2009-01-22 Thread Joshua J. Kugler
Are there any pending plans to add a multi core option to the FD to enable compression to happen on more than one core? We have a few eight-core servers that are rather idle during the backup window, so it would be great to use more than one core for compression. Something like a Max Core

Re: [Bacula-users] Anyway to do multi-core compression?

2009-01-22 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Joshua J. Kugler, In message 200901221238.33834.jos...@eeinternet.com you wrote: Are there any pending plans to add a multi core option to the FD to enable compression to happen on more than one core? We have a few eight-core servers that are rather idle during the backup window, so it

Re: [Bacula-users] Anyway to do multi-core compression?

2009-01-22 Thread Joshua J. Kugler
On Thursday 22 January 2009, Wolfgang Denk said something like: In message 200901221238.33834.jos...@eeinternet.com you wrote: Are there any pending plans to add a multi core option to the FD to enable compression to happen on more than one core? We have a few eight-core servers that are

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Fwd: Anyway to do multi-core compression?

2009-01-22 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Thursday 22 January 2009 23:59:26 Dan Langille wrote: This sounds clever. Hard to do? No, it is essentially the same a item 24 in the projects file. since it was 24 on the last vote, given the items above it, unfortunately we are unlikely to get to it any time soon, even though many of

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Fwd: Anyway to do multi-core compression?

2009-01-22 Thread Dan Langille
On Jan 22, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote: On Thursday 22 January 2009 23:59:26 Dan Langille wrote: This sounds clever. Hard to do? No, it is essentially the same a item 24 in the projects file. since it was 24 on the last vote, given the items above it, unfortunately we are

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Fwd: Anyway to do multi-core compression?

2009-01-22 Thread Frank Sweetser
Dan Langille wrote: On Jan 22, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote: On Thursday 22 January 2009 23:59:26 Dan Langille wrote: This sounds clever. Hard to do? No, it is essentially the same a item 24 in the projects file. since it was 24 on the last vote, given the items above it,

Re: [Bacula-users] Webacula on dapper

2009-01-22 Thread RYAN vAN GINNEKEN
Full error report not sure what you mean? please explain webacula newbe here! nothing is showing up in my apache error or access logs now that i have fixed the permission problems. The only error i can find is the one mentioned in my last post when i try to list the files on the job screen.

Re: [Bacula-users] Webacula on dapper

2009-01-22 Thread Bruno Friedmann
I've verify, the minimal version for running ZF should be at least 5.1.4 your is only 5.1.2 and ZF embedded with webbacula is 1.5.1 Did you see the readme inside the ZF.tar.gz It clearly state that. Better is a 5.2x version ( due to spl requirement ). Actually with 1.7x version the minimal was

Re: [Bacula-users] Webacula on dapper

2009-01-22 Thread Yuri Timofeev
The webacula System Requirements also described in inline help http://host.tld/webacula/help/ or main menu Help 2009/1/23 Bruno Friedmann br...@ioda-net.ch: I've verify, the minimal version for running ZF should be at least 5.1.4 your is only 5.1.2 and ZF embedded with webbacula is 1.5.1 Did

Re: [Bacula-users] Webacula on dapper

2009-01-22 Thread RYAN vAN GINNEKEN
Oh that dreaded word upgrade I knew my php was a bit behind, must be stubborn had to try. I am running ubuntu 6.06 LTS on this machine have not checked but guessing this would require a php install from source. As another option i will be moving to knew hardware soonish maybe i sould use this

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Fwd: Anyway to do multi-core compression?

2009-01-22 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 23 January 2009 01:02:15 Dan Langille wrote: On Jan 22, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote: On Thursday 22 January 2009 23:59:26 Dan Langille wrote: This sounds clever. Hard to do? No, it is essentially the same a item 24 in the projects file. since it was 24 on the last

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] Fwd: Anyway t o do multi-core compression?

2009-01-22 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Friday 23 January 2009 01:06:08 Frank Sweetser wrote: Dan Langille wrote: On Jan 22, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote: On Thursday 22 January 2009 23:59:26 Dan Langille wrote: This sounds clever. Hard to do? No, it is essentially the same a item 24 in the projects file. since