Jeff Palmer schrieb:
Schedule {
Name = MonthlyCycle
Run = Full on 1 at 21:05
Run = Differential on fri at 23:05
Run = Incremental sat-thu at 23:05
}
Bacula schedules are not exclusive, if you define a Full on the 1st and
a Differential on fridays, then you will get a Full
On Friday 31 July 2009 11:41:29 Bram Vandoren wrote:
Dear All,
Bacula (3.0.2) is configured to make daily backups of some systems. Full
backups unfortunately take more then one day to complete and I want to
avoid that duplicate jobs start (or are queued) before the full backup
is completed.
I now discovered a downside of this: cancelled duplicate jobs cause the level
to be ran again if Rerun Failed Levels = yes. And we're back where we
started. Frustrating, hysterically funny, depressing.
Does it seem like a bug to anyone?
I guess I'll have to keep using my check-job.sh script.
Hello,
Perhaps this picture can help you to understand differents MaxTime
directives
http://www.bacula.org/3.0.x-manuals/en/concepts/concepts/New_Features_in_3_0_0.html#SECTION0042414000
Bye
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
I have a job that runs either fulls or diffs, sometimes when
Hi,
the Full Backup Pool in the job resource overrides any Pool definition
in the schedule resource. I want to make daily incremental backup with
exception of two full backups in one week. Every two weeks there should
be a full backup on a seperate bank pool (for tapes goimng outside the
You can also use Full Pool in the schedule which should override the
Full Backup Pool in the Job definition.
nicolae
Peter Allgeyer wrote:
Hi,
the Full Backup Pool in the job resource overrides any Pool definition
in the schedule resource. I want to make daily incremental backup with
Well, the manual reads like this:
Allow Higher Duplicates = yes|no
If this directive is set to *yes* (default) the job with a higher
priority (lower priority number) will be permitted to run. If the
priorities of the two jobs are the same, the outcome is determined by
other directives (see
Ah yes, it really is *yes* by default according to manual, but actually that's
not the case. I've read it multiple times, but I've always misread it :)
--
Silver
On Monday 05 October 2009 13:45:11 Nicolae Mihalache wrote:
Well, the manual reads like this:
Allow Higher Duplicates =
Hi,
following up on the previous discussion, below is a feature request form.
http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-de...@lists.sourceforge.net/msg04962.html
Any comments welcome,
Gavin
-
Item n: Implement a Migration
The problem occurred after a while, here's an history that illustrates
what's happening :
09/14:
Backup Level: Full
FD Files Written: 6,489
on 09/15 and 09/16:
Backup Level: Incremental, since=2009-09-15 23:00:15
FD Files Written: 50
09/17:
Backup Level:
le dahut a crit:
The problem occurred after a while, here's an history that illustrates
what's happening :
09/14:
Backup Level: Full
FD Files Written: 6,489
on 09/15 and 09/16:
Backup Level: Incremental, since=2009-09-15 23:00:15
FD Files Written: 50
Bacula uses the file date to determine which files have changed. So a
file with a future file date would be backed up by each incremental backup.
Since you say that your file was NOT backed up on 9/15 and 9/16, my
guess is that some application may be opening the file for writing
without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
i did a clean setup of bacula on a
Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.60GHz, 3 GB Memory, Intel raid controller forming
5 internal 72 GB-320/10k SCSI LVD drives to a raid 5 array, where
everything is on.
My Quantum M1500 LTO-3 loader is connected via SCSI
Physical drive performance is 28sec for 1 Gigabyte, so ~35MB/sec
[r...@denbvsbcks1 disk1]# dd if=/dev/zero of=swapfile bs=1024
count=100
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
102400 bytes (1.0 GB) copied, 79.907 s, 12.8 MB/s
I am confused. This looks horribly slow. I would
Im using the new function of Bacula Copy jobs... but Im getting this
when I run the job:
What can be that ? How to fix?
thanks
05-Out 11:34 bacula.belgamatrizes.com.br-d JobId 429: No JobIds found to
copy.
05-Out 11:34 bacula.belgamatrizes.com.br-d JobId 429: Bacula
I have bacula 2.0.2 in my bacula server, because it has a working DVD code.
That version is not officially supported any more I guess.
I had clients of version 2.4.4 in Windows and Debian, and now Debian backports
delivered 3.0.2 fd to one of my Debian clients.
The fd no more accepted Hello
Yes. I'd quite forgotten about that. Do recall reading it in Changelog or
Readme...
Thanks,
Shon
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:32 AM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Christian Gaul christian.g...@otop.de
wrote:
Mingus Dew schrieb:
Enter *MediaId or
All,
Using Bacula 3.0.2 on Solaris 10_x86. I have a question regarding how
to properly recover tapes from a status of Error. I also have some
questions on reassigning tapes from one Storage Pool to a different Pool.
I am not sure how this status came to be, but I currently have a few tapes
All,
Using Bacula 3.0.2 on Solaris 10_x86. I have a
question regarding how to properly recover tapes from a
status of Error. I also have some questions on
reassigning tapes from one Storage Pool to a different
Pool.
I am not sure how this status came to be, but I currently
have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
o.k., if my following estimation is true, you are right.
p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }
5-Oct 18:22 denbvsbcks1-sd JobId 3: Job write elapsed time = 00:09:13,
Transfer rate = 5.881 M bytes/second
05-Oct 18:22 denbvsbcks1-sd JobId 3:
hey fellas,
have been using bacula for over 4 years now, great neat powerful!
i come across two issues with bacula, that i think can be taken care of
on bacula level, which are not implemented yet (or i am not aware of them):
1. using a tape library, sometimes issue arise when bacula
Bob thanks for your input...
On 10/05/2009 01:26 PM, Bob Hetzel wrote:
hey fellas,
have been using bacula for over 4 years now, great neat powerful!
i come across two issues with bacula, that i think can be taken care
of on bacula level, which are not implemented yet (or i am not aware
On 10/05/2009 01:31 PM, Kiryl Hakhovich wrote:
Bob thanks for your input...
On 10/05/2009 01:26 PM, Bob Hetzel wrote:
hey fellas,
have been using bacula for over 4 years now, great neat powerful!
i come across two issues with bacula, that i think can be taken care
of on bacula
Good afternoon.
I am having a recurring issue with a backup that is configured for DR
purposes. The client purchased a fixed amount of space and wants to
overwrite the volumes each night. They have a local backup system in
place and we are using Bacula to get those backups offsite for the
Klaus Troeger wrote:
Does it mean, that the spooling to disk was at avarage of 6 MB/sec,
and the writing to tape
reached the 35 MB/sec
It does appear that way. Are you using encryption and/or (software)
compression? Both slow down the spooling process, though by how much I
don't know. If
Kevin Keane a écrit :
Bacula uses the file date to determine which files have changed. So a
file with a future file date would be backed up by each incremental backup.
Since you say that your file was NOT backed up on 9/15 and 9/16, my
guess is that some application may be opening the file
Guillaume_h wrote:
Kevin Keane a écrit :
Bacula uses the file date to determine which files have changed. So a
file with a future file date would be backed up by each incremental backup.
Since you say that your file was NOT backed up on 9/15 and 9/16, my
guess is that some
I've upgraded to 3.0.2 from 2.4.x and now it seems when spooling job, that
when the SD is despooling, no other jobs will spool until it is finished
despooling. I had a very large job running and it started despooling, I was
adding a new client with some client run before scripts, so I was testing
28 matches
Mail list logo
