[Bacula-users] Some problem with database and volumes

2010-02-04 Thread eMJay
I already had this problem. I suspect that it happens when a volume is recycled after the backup job starts Do you have enough volumes? Is Purge Oldest Volumes option set? I have created 10 volumes.

Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot Install Bacula When Symantec was Installed

2010-02-04 Thread Fahrer, Julian
I also have a customer running a windows server 2003 with symantec endpoint protection and a 3.0.x fd. I have no problems on that host so far. BUT at the same customer there is a win vista box where the backup fails when symantec is running. Just fyi Kind regards Julian -Ursprüngliche

Re: [Bacula-users] Some problem with database and volumes

2010-02-04 Thread Bruno Friedmann
check permission on your /mnt/mnt1 as the running bacula-sd daemon should be allowed to write some backup data here isn't it ? :-) On 02/04/2010 09:16 AM, eMJay wrote: I already had this problem. I suspect that it happens when a volume is recycled after the backup job starts Do you

[Bacula-users] label barcodes + IBM / ANSI tape labels

2010-02-04 Thread Thomas Dhollander
Dear all I have a few questions regarding the labeling of volumes in bacula release 3.0.3: As we are using an IBM TS2900 autochanger, i had set label type to 'IBM'. However, the label barcodes command now fails because Bacula tries to assign labels that are 8 characters long, while the

[Bacula-users] Force bacula to use specific storage for restore job

2010-02-04 Thread Rinat Shigapov
How can I force bacula to use specific storage for restore job? -- Regards, Rinat Shigapov -- The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best

Re: [Bacula-users] Force bacula to use specific storage for restore job

2010-02-04 Thread Carlo Filippetto
After you select the files to restore, you can change the path and the client where you want to put the files Parameters to modify: 1: Level 2: Storage 3: Job 4: FileSet 5: Restore Client 6: When 7: Priority 8: Bootstrap 9: Where 10: File

Re: [Bacula-users] Force bacula to use specific storage for restore job

2010-02-04 Thread Rinat Shigapov
04.02.2010 15:13, Carlo Filippetto пишет: After you select the files to restore, you can change the path and the client where you want to put the files Parameters to modify: 1: Level 2: Storage 3: Job 4: FileSet 5: Restore Client 6: When 7:

Re: [Bacula-users] Force bacula to use specific storage for restore job

2010-02-04 Thread Dan Langille
Rinat Shigapov wrote: 04.02.2010 15:13, Carlo Filippetto пишет: After you select the files to restore, you can change the path and the client where you want to put the files Parameters to modify: 1: Level 2: Storage 3: Job 4: FileSet 5: Restore Client

Re: [Bacula-users] Force bacula to use specific storage for restore job

2010-02-04 Thread Rinat Shigapov
I think your question: How can I get a list of backups for a given client? Then you can select whichever of those backups you want. Yes! You are right. -- Regards, Rinat Shigapov -- The Planet: dedicated and

Re: [Bacula-users] Some problem with database and volumes

2010-02-04 Thread Timo Neuvonen
Bruno Friedmann br...@ioda-net.ch kirjoitti viestissä:4b6a8dd2.1040...@ioda-net.ch... check permission on your /mnt/mnt1 as the running bacula-sd daemon should be allowed to write some backup data here isn't it ? :-) ...and since it's /mnt/... the actual problem probably is the permissions

Re: [Bacula-users] label barcodes + IBM / ANSI tape labels

2010-02-04 Thread John Drescher
As we are using an IBM TS2900 autochanger, i had set label type to 'IBM'. However, the label barcodes command now fails because Bacula tries to assign labels that are 8 characters long, while the maximum is 6. Should we use IBM labels or not? If so, is manual labeling required (rather than

[Bacula-users] Some problem with database and volumes

2010-02-04 Thread eMJay
check permission on your /mnt/mnt1 as the running bacula-sd daemon should be allowed to write some backup data here isn't it ? On 02/04/2010 09:16 AM, eMJay wrote: Quote: Quote: I already had this problem. I suspect that it happens when a volume is recycled after the

Re: [Bacula-users] Some problem with database and volumes

2010-02-04 Thread John Drescher
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:01 AM, eMJay bacula-fo...@backupcentral.com wrote: check permission on your /mnt/mnt1 as the running bacula-sd daemon should be allowed to write some backup data here isn't it ? On 02/04/2010 09:16 AM, eMJay wrote: Quote: Quote: I already had this problem.

Re: [Bacula-users] Changes to filesets not having any effect, possibly a bug?

2010-02-04 Thread Martin Simmons
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:34:02 -0500, Steve Polyack said: Hello all, I've made changes to a job's fileset, but it does not seem to have any effect. By doing a SELECT in the bacula database, I'm able to see that files which are part of a path which I've added to an Exclude block are still

[Bacula-users] Some problem with database and volumes

2010-02-04 Thread eMJay
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:01 AM, eMJay bacula-forum at backupcentral.com wrote: Quote: Quote: check permission on your /mnt/mnt1 as the running bacula-sd daemon should be allowed to write some backup data here isn't it ? On 02/04/2010 09:16 AM, eMJay wrote: Quote:

[Bacula-users] Problems Debian 5 + Bacula 5

2010-02-04 Thread Pedro Bordin Hoffmann
Hello, After compiling bacula 5 on debian lenny I noticed that storage was missing, so I took a look on the compiling log.. Something went wrong, what, I couldnt find... Follows a part of log: Compiling Makefile /usr/bin/g++ -static -L../lib -L../findlib -o bls bls.o block.o butil.o device.o

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] bug in autolabel code in 5.0.0?

2010-02-04 Thread Bob Hetzel
Richard Scobie wrote: Bob Hetzel wrote: Has anybody gotten 5.0.0 to label tapes properly? I upgraded to 5.0.0 a couple days ago and backups worked that first night until they ran out of appendable (i.e. already partially written) media. Since that point, I've been completely stuck.

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] bug in autolabel code in 5.0.0?

2010-02-04 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 02/04/10 15:25, Bob Hetzel wrote: Upgrading to Ubuntu 9.10 brought along a ton of upgraded programs and libraries so I've no idea where to begin. Ubuntu 9.10 was a *very* bad update. I've been advising people to just avoid it and wait for 10.04. Based on various reports I've seen, more

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] bug in autolabel code in 5.0.0?

2010-02-04 Thread Richard Scobie
Bob Hetzel wrote: My next thought was to try use tar to read and write from a tape. That works fine: I've been able to back up an entire directory and restore files from it. I've also back up a single file and restored that file, comparing it to the original file and no differences were

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] bug in autolabel code in 5.0.0?

2010-02-04 Thread Bob Hetzel
Richard Scobie wrote: Bob Hetzel wrote: My next thought was to try use tar to read and write from a tape. That works fine: I've been able to back up an entire directory and restore files from it. I've also back up a single file and restored that file, comparing it to the original file

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] bug in autolabel code in 5.0.0?

2010-02-04 Thread Richard Scobie
Bob Hetzel wrote: The auto test passed, but I now cannot mount any tape from within bacula, either completely new (i.e. unlabeled) or filled completely with bacula backups. It always thinks the tape is not labeled, giving errors like these: This is exactly what I was seeing and the problem

Re: [Bacula-users] Some problem with database and volumes

2010-02-04 Thread Mike Holden
eMJay wrote: On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 11:01 AM, eMJay bacula-forum at backupcentral.com wrote: Quote: Quote: check permission on your /mnt/mnt1 as the running bacula-sd daemon should be allowed to write some backup data here isn't it ? On 02/04/2010 09:16 AM, eMJay wrote: