Hi all,
Can someone please help me figure why my catalog file retention only seems
to be 14 days. What I am hoping for, is that the weekly backup jobs should
auto-prune after 15 days, and the file retention to also be 15 days.
Monthly jobs should auto-prune after 65 days, likewise their
On 14/09/10, Tobias Brink (tobias.br...@gmail.com) wrote:
You should also be careful with the 5.0.2-1 version if you use
Postgres: it broke my database on upgrade. This is fixed in 5.0.2-2
which is not (yet?) in the backports. See also
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591293
I have a W2008r2 server w/ 5.0.3x64 at has recently been nearly impossible to
backup. Its running
on HP hardware and I have tried updating the NIC firmware and drivers w/o
success. What's
getting more frustrating is that the 5.0.3 director on CentOSx64 takes forever
to cancel the job
when
Hi
I am trying to find some RPM's for Bacula on CentOS 5.
i found only for RedHat 7 can i use theses ones or do I need
absolutelly to use CentOS RPMs?
I know that mostly it works between RH and CentOS rpm's but i want to
be sure to not have problems in the future.
Could you tell me you
On Wednesday 15 September 2010 01:31:04 pm Hugo Letemplier wrote:
Hi
I am trying to find some RPM's for Bacula on CentOS 5.
i found only for RedHat 7 can i use theses ones or do I need
absolutelly to use CentOS RPMs?
I know that mostly it works between RH and CentOS rpm's but i want to
be
On Wednesday 15 September 2010 08:53:07 Silver Salonen wrote:
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 21:54:21 Silver Salonen wrote:
On 14.09.2010 18:48, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:54:11 +0300, Silver Salonen said:
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 15:16:47 Martin Simmons wrote:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:53:07 +0300, Silver Salonen said:
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 21:54:21 Silver Salonen wrote:
On 14.09.2010 18:48, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:54:11 +0300, Silver Salonen said:
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 15:16:47 Martin Simmons wrote:
On
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:08:17 +0200, Bruno Friedmann said:
Martin didn't A status for Accurate ( as shown in the extract log ) ?
No, there is no special status for Accurate.
__Martin
--
Start uncovering the many
sudo rpmbuild -bb --define build_postgresql=1 --define build_centos5 1 --
define rhel_version=501 bacula.spec
Not only do you not need to unpack the srpm to get the the spec to build from
But you shouldn't at all build as root?
Use a buidroot [1]:
$ rpmbuild --rebuild --define build_centos5=1
On Wednesday 15 September 2010 16:49:18 Martin Simmons wrote:
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:53:07 +0300, Silver Salonen said:
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 21:54:21 Silver Salonen wrote:
On 14.09.2010 18:48, Martin Simmons wrote:
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:54:11 +0300, Silver Salonen said:
On Wednesday 15 September 2010 04:05:29 pm Joseph L. Casale wrote:
sudo rpmbuild -bb --define build_postgresql=1 --define build_centos5 1
-- define rhel_version=501 bacula.spec
Not only do you not need to unpack the srpm to get the the spec to build
from But you shouldn't at all build as
11 matches
Mail list logo