Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple CPU core support, 100% usage while restore

2011-01-04 Thread Tom Sommer
On Tue, January 4, 2011 03:15, Dan Langille wrote: On 1/3/2011 12:57 PM, Tom Sommer wrote: I'm currently restoring 1.5 mill. files and it's taking forever. bacula-sd is using 100% CPU, disk IO is apparently low, so I assume it's a CPU issue. My machine has 16GB RAM and 2 CPUs: top -

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-Users] Bweb showing finished verify jobs with differences as running

2011-01-04 Thread Jeremy Maes
Op 30/12/2010 19:04, Martin Simmons schreef: On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 19:24:05 GMT, Martin Simmons said: On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:36:58 +0100, Jeremy Maes said: I posted the requested info as a comment on the bug report (since the mantis signup seems fixed) Everything can thus be found right here.

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula configration for FC LTO-5 tape drive

2011-01-04 Thread Alan Brown
Arunav Mandal wrote: I have a Tandberg T40+ Tapeloader with HP LTO-5 tape drive connected to QLogic Corp. ISP2532-based 8Gb Fibre Channel to PCI Express HBA on a Dell 2950 running Ubuntu Server 10.10. The kernel version is 2.6.35-24-server. The autoloader device number changes sometimes with

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple CPU core support, 100% usage while restore

2011-01-04 Thread Dan Langille
On 1/4/2011 5:00 AM, Tom Sommer wrote: On Tue, January 4, 2011 03:15, Dan Langille wrote: On 1/3/2011 12:57 PM, Tom Sommer wrote: I'm currently restoring 1.5 mill. files and it's taking forever. bacula-sd is using 100% CPU, disk IO is apparently low, so I assume it's a CPU issue. My

[Bacula-users] [Bacula-5.0.3] Error when granting privileges with PostgreSQL-9.0.1

2011-01-04 Thread Craig Ferguson
Hello, I am experiencing an issue while trying to install Bacula on my FreeBSD 8.0 x64 box. I was able to install Bacula from the ports tree without difficulty, and was able to run create_bacula_database and make_bacula_tables successfully. My issue happens when trying to run

[Bacula-users] SLES9 x64 ONLY intermittent bsock error and fails job. 50% of the time the jobs work all other clients work fine

2011-01-04 Thread Paul Hanson
Hi, I have an installation that was previously using version 2.4.4 and was upgraded to 5.0.3 with good success. However, there was a previous problem with the SLES9 x64 clients that would intermittently fail the jobs due to bsock errors. So the error has carried forward from 2.4.4 to 5.0.3 and

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula configration for FC LTO-5 tape drive

2011-01-04 Thread Arunav Mandal
Thx for your reply. I did used Centos 5.5 for our old SDLT tape loaders but then there is no bacula repo for Redhat/Centos and I have to compile which I want to avoid. Since you use Redhat is there any bacula RPM's for Redhat? Do you use stinit.def for your tape drive? Arunav. Date:

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-5.0.3] Error when granting privileges with PostgreSQL-9.0.1

2011-01-04 Thread Rory Campbell-Lange
On 04/01/11, Craig Ferguson (cferguso...@gmail.com) wrote: psql:-:38: ERROR: relation jobhisto_jobid_seq does not exist I don't think this is anything to worry about. See http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg06272.html and responses. -- Rory Campbell-Lange

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple CPU core support, 100% usage while restore

2011-01-04 Thread Tom Sommer
On Tue, January 4, 2011 12:59, Dan Langille wrote: On 1/4/2011 5:00 AM, Tom Sommer wrote: On Tue, January 4, 2011 03:15, Dan Langille wrote: On 1/3/2011 12:57 PM, Tom Sommer wrote: I'm currently restoring 1.5 mill. files and it's taking forever. bacula-sd is using 100% CPU, disk IO is

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-5.0.3] Error when granting privileges with PostgreSQL-9.0.1

2011-01-04 Thread Craig Ferguson
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Rory Campbell-Lange r...@campbell-lange.net wrote: On 04/01/11, Craig Ferguson (cferguso...@gmail.com) wrote: psql:-:38: ERROR: relation jobhisto_jobid_seq does not exist I don't think this is anything to worry about. See

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula configration for FC LTO-5 tape drive

2011-01-04 Thread Juergen Gotteswinter
we created bacula rpms for centos that we use in our hosting company. you can get them from http://download.obs.j0ke.net//server:/backup/CentOS_5/ Am 04.01.11 13:10, schrieb Arunav Mandal: Thx for your reply. I did used Centos 5.5 for our old SDLT tape loaders but then there is no bacula

Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot find any appendable volumes - But auto labeling is enabled?

2011-01-04 Thread Mister IT Guru
On 04/01/2011 02:13, Dan Langille wrote: On 1/3/2011 4:53 PM, Mister IT Guru wrote: I am at a loss as to why this can occur, when I've configured automatic labellings. I get this error emailed to me when jobs are trying to run Cannot find any appendable volumes It's my understanding that

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple CPU core support, 100% usage while restore

2011-01-04 Thread Tom Sommer
On Tue, January 4, 2011 13:55, Tom Sommer wrote: On Tue, January 4, 2011 12:59, Dan Langille wrote: On 1/4/2011 5:00 AM, Tom Sommer wrote: On Tue, January 4, 2011 03:15, Dan Langille wrote: On 1/3/2011 12:57 PM, Tom Sommer wrote: I'm currently restoring 1.5 mill. files and it's taking

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple CPU core support, 100% usage while restore

2011-01-04 Thread Dan Langille
On Tue, January 4, 2011 7:55 am, Tom Sommer wrote: On Tue, January 4, 2011 12:59, Dan Langille wrote: On 1/4/2011 5:00 AM, Tom Sommer wrote: On Tue, January 4, 2011 03:15, Dan Langille wrote: On 1/3/2011 12:57 PM, Tom Sommer wrote: I'm currently restoring 1.5 mill. files and it's taking

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple CPU core support, 100% usage while restore

2011-01-04 Thread Dan Langille
On Tue, January 4, 2011 8:47 am, Tom Sommer wrote: On Tue, January 4, 2011 13:55, Tom Sommer wrote: On Tue, January 4, 2011 12:59, Dan Langille wrote: On 1/4/2011 5:00 AM, Tom Sommer wrote: On Tue, January 4, 2011 03:15, Dan Langille wrote: On 1/3/2011 12:57 PM, Tom Sommer wrote:

Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot find any appendable volumes - But auto labeling is enabled?

2011-01-04 Thread Kleber Leal
What pool your jobs are writing? You enabled autolabel on File pool. Your jobs are trying write on it? Verify your config files. By default (no config), the job get JobDefs definition and write on Default pool. Your default pool has not autolabeling enabled. Try change it to File pool overriding

Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot find any appendable volumes - But auto labeling is enabled?

2011-01-04 Thread Dan Langille
On Tue, January 4, 2011 8:23 am, Mister IT Guru wrote: On 04/01/2011 02:13, Dan Langille wrote: On 1/3/2011 4:53 PM, Mister IT Guru wrote: I am at a loss as to why this can occur, when I've configured automatic labellings. I get this error emailed to me when jobs are trying to run Cannot

Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot find any appendable volumes - But auto labeling is enabled?

2011-01-04 Thread Paulo Martinez
Am 04.01.2011 um 14:23 schrieb Mister IT Guru: On 04/01/2011 02:13, Dan Langille wrote: On 1/3/2011 4:53 PM, Mister IT Guru wrote: I am at a loss as to why this can occur, when I've configured automatic labellings. I get this error emailed to me when jobs are trying to run Cannot find

Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot find any appendable volumes - But auto labeling is enabled?

2011-01-04 Thread Caspar Smit
I had the same message and I had to repair some mysql tables to fix it! I thought the tables were 'Media' and 'JobMedia' Kind regards, Caspar Smit 2011/1/3 Mister IT Guru misteritg...@gmx.com I am at a loss as to why this can occur, when I've configured automatic labellings. I get this

Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot find any appendable volumes - But auto labeling is enabled?

2011-01-04 Thread Mister IT Guru
On 04/01/2011 14:16, Dan Langille wrote: On Tue, January 4, 2011 8:23 am, Mister IT Guru wrote: On 04/01/2011 02:13, Dan Langille wrote: On 1/3/2011 4:53 PM, Mister IT Guru wrote: I am at a loss as to why this can occur, when I've configured automatic labellings. I get this error emailed to

Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot find any appendable volumes - But auto labeling is enabled?

2011-01-04 Thread Mister IT Guru
On 04/01/2011 14:27, Paulo Martinez wrote: Am 04.01.2011 um 14:23 schrieb Mister IT Guru: On 04/01/2011 02:13, Dan Langille wrote: On 1/3/2011 4:53 PM, Mister IT Guru wrote: I am at a loss as to why this can occur, when I've configured automatic labellings. I get this error emailed to me

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple CPU core support, 100% usage while restore

2011-01-04 Thread Tom Sommer
On 04-01-2011 15:11, Dan Langille wrote: On Tue, January 4, 2011 7:55 am, Tom Sommer wrote: On Tue, January 4, 2011 12:59, Dan Langille wrote: On 1/4/2011 5:00 AM, Tom Sommer wrote: On Tue, January 4, 2011 03:15, Dan Langille wrote: On 1/3/2011 12:57 PM, Tom Sommer wrote: I'm currently

Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple CPU core support, 100% usage while restore

2011-01-04 Thread Dan Langille
On Tue, January 4, 2011 10:19 am, Tom Sommer wrote: On 04-01-2011 15:11, Dan Langille wrote: On Tue, January 4, 2011 7:55 am, Tom Sommer wrote: I'm thinking it might be due to compression? Does that make sense? I don't know. But FYI: the SD does not do compression. The FD does. Okay, then

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-5.0.3] Error when granting privileges with PostgreSQL-9.0.1

2011-01-04 Thread Martin Simmons
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 06:57:40 -0600, Craig Ferguson said: On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:49 AM, Rory Campbell-Lange r...@campbell-lange.net wrote: On 04/01/11, Craig Ferguson (cferguso...@gmail.com) wrote: psql:-:38: ERROR: relation jobhisto_jobid_seq does not exist I don't think this is

[Bacula-users] Script contribution

2011-01-04 Thread Raymond Norton
I haven't followed the development of bacula, so maybe this has been addressed in the past. I was forever having trouble with laptop users not being on-line when backups fired off. A member from another forum provided the following script that can be run from cron on the bacula box. It tested

[Bacula-users] Error: bsock.c:208 gethostbyname() after domain name change

2011-01-04 Thread pgf
Guy wrote: In your conf file are you using fully qualified host names? Ie host.newdomain or just hostname? Dan, thanks for the hint. I had one entry in bacula-dir.conf that was not fully qualified. Just what was caching the old domain name is still unclear, but only Bacula seemed to be

Re: [Bacula-users] Error: bsock.c:208 gethostbyname() after domain name change

2011-01-04 Thread Bruno Friedmann
On 01/04/2011 06:35 PM, pgf wrote: Guy wrote: In your conf file are you using fully qualified host names? Ie host.newdomain or just hostname? Dan, thanks for the hint. I had one entry in bacula-dir.conf that was not fully qualified. Just what was caching the old domain name is still

[Bacula-users] Error: bsock.c:208 gethostbyname() after domain name change

2011-01-04 Thread pgf
Bruno Friedmann wrote: On 01/04/2011 06:35 PM, pgf wrote: services that can be a killer in the case of change avahi-dns nscd (there's actually two daemon with that name and unscd is worst that the old nscd ) It was done - in fact, the system having problems was rebooted after the

Re: [Bacula-users] Cannot find any appendable volumes - But auto labeling is enabled?

2011-01-04 Thread Mark
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Mister IT Guru misteritg...@gmx.com wrote: LabelMedia = yes; appears in all all my device definitions, and the storage daemon has been reloaded, restarted, reconfigured, reloaded, and restarted again. :) Sorry if you've already posted it and I missed it,