Re: [Bacula-users] Choice of DB for catalog

2011-01-18 Thread Arunav Mandal
Our catalog is around 16GB and at times I have seen mysql been slow. I am using Mysql 5.0.77. Is there any easy way to migrate from Mysql to Postgres? Arunav. -Original Message- From: Jeremy Maes [mailto:j...@schaubroeck.be] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 8:44 AM To:

[Bacula-users] Problem with duplicate files in catalog

2011-01-18 Thread Mark Round
Hi all, I have a strange issue with one of my Bacula servers, as it seems to be backing up files on my clients twice during a session. I first noticed this on Bacula 2.4.4 (Debian Lenny), but have just upgraded the server to 5.0.2 (Debian Squeeze), and the problem persists. I first noticed it

Re: [Bacula-users] Choice of DB for catalog

2011-01-18 Thread Bart Swedrowski
On 18 January 2011 09:18, Arunav Mandal di...@hotmail.com wrote: Our catalog is around 16GB and at times I have seen mysql been slow. I am using Mysql 5.0.77. Is there any easy way to migrate from Mysql to Postgres With this kind of problems and when catalog is getting that big it's not a

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with duplicate files in catalog

2011-01-18 Thread Guy
What's your schedules look like? I would suspect that you have incremental and FULL running at the same time, and if there is not a pre-existing FULL then the incremental is upgraded to a full. I changed the priority of my incrementals so that they don't run while fulls are running. --Guy

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with duplicate files in catalog

2011-01-18 Thread Mark Round
Thanks for the comments. I've checked, and Incrementals run Tuesday to Sunday, and Fulls on Monday morning, so they aren't running twice : Schedule { Name = Default Run = Level=Full mon at 1:00 Run = Level=Incremental tue-sun at 1:00 } Even if I only select the

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with duplicate files in catalog

2011-01-18 Thread Jeremy Maes
Op 18/01/2011 10:40, Mark Round schreef: Hi all, I have a strange issue with one of my Bacula servers, as it seems to be backing up files on my clients twice during a session. I first noticed this on Bacula 2.4.4 (Debian Lenny), but have just upgraded the server to 5.0.2 (Debian Squeeze),

Re: [Bacula-users] Problem with duplicate files in catalog

2011-01-18 Thread Guy
hmm.. ok can you paste your fileSet? maybe you're including the files twice. ---Guy On 18 Jan 2011, at 10:07, Mark Round wrote: Thanks for the comments. I’ve checked, and Incrementals run Tuesday to Sunday, and Fulls on Monday morning, so they aren’t running twice : Schedule {

[Bacula-users] Retention Configuration

2011-01-18 Thread Paulo Martinez
Hi all, i have my retention configuration only in the pool resource. Job and file retentions included, because different pools have different retention times for job, files, vol., e.g. Pool { Name = Differential-Woche Pool Type = Backup Recycle = yes # Bacula can

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-3 tape Not Compressing data and speed

2011-01-18 Thread John Drescher
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Jose Antonio Rodriguez Martin jarodrig...@cgi.es wrote: So if I have understood correctly 1 .- # mt-f / dev/nst0 WEOF 2 .- # mt-f / dev/nst0 compression 1 3 .- verify that compression is enabled - tapeinfo-f / dev/sg5 .. Product Type: Tape Drive Vendor ID:

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-3 tape Not Compressing data and speed

2011-01-18 Thread John Drescher
Nothing, it still does not copy more than 417 GB ... I believe 417GB shows that compression is on since the tape is 400 GB. What are you using as a source to this copy? If it is a compressed format you will fit close to the native size of 400GB if it is text you will fit between 1 and 2TB.

Re: [Bacula-users] Retention Configuration

2011-01-18 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Paulo Martinez martinez...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi all, i have my retention configuration only in the pool resource. Job and file retentions included, because different pools have different retention times for job, files, vol., e.g. Pool {   Name =

Re: [Bacula-users] Retention Configuration

2011-01-18 Thread Paulo Martinez
Am 18.01.2011 um 12:54 schrieb John Drescher: On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:21 AM, Paulo Martinez martinez...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi all, i have my retention configuration only in the pool resource. Job and file retentions included, because different pools have different retention times for

Re: [Bacula-users] Retention Configuration

2011-01-18 Thread Martin Simmons
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:21:44 +0100, Paulo Martinez said: How to handle different retentions for different pool? I think you can't in the current release -- per-pool retention is broken. See http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg42297.html __Martin

Re: [Bacula-users] Retention Configuration

2011-01-18 Thread Paulo Martinez
Am 18.01.2011 um 13:44 schrieb Martin Simmons: On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:21:44 +0100, Paulo Martinez said: How to handle different retentions for different pool? I think you can't in the current release -- per-pool retention is broken. See

Re: [Bacula-users] Retention Configuration

2011-01-18 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Paulo Martinez martinez...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 18.01.2011 um 13:44 schrieb Martin Simmons: On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:21:44 +0100, Paulo Martinez said: How to handle different retentions for different pool? I think you can't in the current release --

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-3 tape Not Compressing data and speed

2011-01-18 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 01/18/11 02:24, Jose Antonio Rodriguez Martin wrote: Nothing, it still does not copy more than 417 GB ... If you're getting 417GB onto a 400GB tape, you're getting compression. You're just not getting MUCH of it. What kind of data are you backing up? Not all data compresses well. English

[Bacula-users] SD Losing Track of Pool

2011-01-18 Thread Peter Zenge
A couple days ago somebody made a comment that using pool overrides in a schedule was deprecated. I've been using them for years, but I've been seeing a strange problem recently that I'm thinking might be related. I'm running 5.0.2 on Debian, separate Dir/Mysql and SD systems, using files on

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume space after Job returned Error...

2011-01-18 Thread Rodrigo Renie Braga
Sorry, actually the Volume is marked as Full, not Used as I posted before... thanks... 2011/1/18 Rodrigo Renie Braga rodrigore...@gmail.com Hello everyone.. I'm currently using, in my Tape Storage, LTO-4 Tapes (800Gb each). I had a Volume on a specific Pool with already 100G of space used

[Bacula-users] Volume space after Job returned Error...

2011-01-18 Thread Rodrigo Renie Braga
Hello everyone.. I'm currently using, in my Tape Storage, LTO-4 Tapes (800Gb each). I had a Volume on a specific Pool with already 100G of space used by previous Full backups. After that, I started a Full Backup job on the same Pool, which ended up using the same Volume (no problem there). Since

Re: [Bacula-users] Retention Configuration

2011-01-18 Thread Martin Simmons
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:07:45 +0100, Paulo Martinez said: Am 18.01.2011 um 13:44 schrieb Martin Simmons: On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:21:44 +0100, Paulo Martinez said: How to handle different retentions for different pool? I think you can't in the current release -- per-pool retention is

Re: [Bacula-users] Retention Configuration

2011-01-18 Thread Blake Dunlap
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 13:11, Martin Simmons mar...@lispworks.com wrote: On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:07:45 +0100, Paulo Martinez said: Am 18.01.2011 um 13:44 schrieb Martin Simmons: On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:21:44 +0100, Paulo Martinez said: How to handle different retentions for

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume space after Job returned Error...

2011-01-18 Thread Timo Neuvonen
Rodrigo Renie Braga rodrigore...@gmail.com kirjoitti viestissä news:AANLkTi=vLBszk=7e9f7aoeeqssny6b2vhacvrfqci...@mail.gmail.com... Sorry, actually the Volume is marked as Full, not Used as I posted before... thanks... 2011/1/18 Rodrigo Renie Braga rodrigore...@gmail.com Hello

Re: [Bacula-users] Creating archival backup

2011-01-18 Thread Craig Miskell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Thomas Mueller wrote: Am Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:48:40 -0300 schrieb Kleber Leal: I do it at last 31th december. I created a Full backup (VirtualFull) to a tape and purged the volume. But, you should not to do differential ou incremental backups

[Bacula-users] Software compression: None

2011-01-18 Thread Steve Thompson
Bacula 5.0.2, CentOS 5.5, x86_64. I reported this back in November, to no comment. I have a lot of full backups that are reporting Software Compression: None. Software compression is most definitely turned on. For example, all of my fileset definitions begin in a similar fashion to: FileSet

Re: [Bacula-users] Retention Configuration

2011-01-18 Thread Paulo Martinez
Am 18.01.2011 um 21:06 schrieb Blake Dunlap: On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 13:11, Martin Simmons mar...@lispworks.com wrote: On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:07:45 +0100, Paulo Martinez said: Am 18.01.2011 um 13:44 schrieb Martin Simmons: On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:21:44 +0100, Paulo Martinez said:

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume space after Job returned Error...

2011-01-18 Thread Rodrigo Renie Braga
Yeah, thats exactly what I did, the other volume I could save (I purged it), but since I'm running short on Tapes here, I just wondered if there was a way to save that space on the first volume... The logic about concurrent Jobs is absolutely right, but since I KNOW that there was only one Job on

Re: [Bacula-users] Software compression: None

2011-01-18 Thread Dan Langille
On 1/18/2011 4:16 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: Bacula 5.0.2, CentOS 5.5, x86_64. I reported this back in November, to no comment. I have a lot of full backups that are reporting Software Compression: None. Software compression is most definitely turned on. For example, all of my fileset

Re: [Bacula-users] Software compression: None

2011-01-18 Thread Kleber Leal
The use of AllowCompression=No on storage definition can override compression option on fileset. Kleber 2011/1/18 Dan Langille d...@langille.org On 1/18/2011 4:16 PM, Steve Thompson wrote: Bacula 5.0.2, CentOS 5.5, x86_64. I reported this back in November, to no comment. I have a lot

[Bacula-users] Trouble compiling bacula 5.0.3 under Solaris 10

2011-01-18 Thread Kenneth Garges
Yet another with problems compiling bacula 5.0.3 under Solaris. I'm only trying to compile the storage daemon. LDFLAGS=-L/usr/sfw/lib -R/usr/sfw/lib CFLAGS=-g ./configure --prefix=/opt/app --sbindir=/opt/app/bacula/sbin datarootdir=/usr/share --oldincludedir=/usr/include

Re: [Bacula-users] Trouble compiling bacula 5.0.3 under Solaris 10

2011-01-18 Thread Gary R. Schmidt
On Wed, January 19, 2011 12:30, Kenneth Garges wrote: Yet another with problems compiling bacula 5.0.3 under Solaris. I'm only trying to compile the storage daemon. [SNIP] --enable-static-sd ^^ Don't do this on S10, static linking is deprecated. Hmm, inflateInit implies it is