Thanks. But after I installed mtx for my Linux server and try label, it gave
me different error:
*label
Automatically selected Catalog: MyCatalog
Using Catalog MyCatalog
Automatically selected Storage: LTO-2
Connecting to Storage daemon LTO-2 at cole:9103 ...
Enter new Volume name: testvol
The files are copied to tape files created by the bacula. Which are
compressed:
Filset:
Include {Options {Signature = MD5; compression = GZIP5}
.
What we have are two sets of backup:
1.-copied to hard disk files Bacula
2.-these same files copy them to tape.
To confirm you have
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 09:47:32 -0500 (EST), Steve Thompson said:
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011, Dan Langille wrote:
On 1/18/2011 4:16 PM, Steve Thompson wrote:
Whether software compression happens or not seems to be random. Anyone
know why this is happening?
There was a discussion this week
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:16:47 -0800, Kenneth Garges said:
Thanks for your tips. Unfortunately still no joy.
Switched to the latest Sun Studio compiler instead of gcc.
I made my config script close to yours changing only a couple paths.
#! /bin/sh
# Script from Gary Schmidt for
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:48:13 +0100, Frank Altpeter said:
After a short discussion on the channel, I was advised to create a
post here to see if there's help for that or if it's really a bug.
I've got a machine that is using bind mounts. Despite the fact that
the fileset definition is
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:48:56 -0700, Peter Zenge said:
A couple days ago somebody made a comment that using pool overrides in a
schedule was deprecated. I've been using them for years, but I've been
seeing a strange problem recently that I'm thinking might be related.
I'm running 5.0.2 on
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Martin Simmons wrote:
It reports None if there were no files in the backup or if the compression
saved less than 0.5%, so it doesn't necessarily mean that it wasn't attempted.
I understand that, but I have several file sets that, for a full backup
level, sometimes give in
On 1/20/2011 3:09 AM, harryl wrote:
Thanks. But after I installed mtx for my Linux server and try label, it gave
me different error:
Getting the autochanger wroking can be a long task. I documented my
steps. Start with:
http://www.freebsddiary.org/tape-library.php
And then perhaps:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Dan Langille wrote:
Time for new eyes. Post the job emails.
One full backup completed. Here are the relevant definitions:
Job {
Name = bear_data15
JobDefs = defjob
Pool = Pool_bear_data15
Write Bootstrap = /var/lib/bacula/bear_data15.bsr
Client = bear-fd
Hi all,
I have now tried this on a network client running the same version of Bacula
(5.0.2), and I still get this problem. However, if I compare this to a local
job (e.g. the Bacula server is backing itself up), it doesn't happen: files
only appear once in the catalog.
I thought it might be
The files are copied to tape files created by the bacula. Which are
compressed:
So then what you are seeing is the expected result. Remember you
generally do not get good compression ratios on a second (or
subsequent) compression of a data set. After the first pass most of
the redundancy has
Hi,
I am running bacula 5.0.3 on CentOS 5.6.
When I run a simple Job I can have rates between 20 or 40 MB/s over a
Gigabyte network but when I am running this job with client encryption
and compression everything become slow below 5 MB/s and sometimes
under 500 KB/s.
Generally I test with a
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 07:53:54 -0500 (EST), Steve Thompson said:
FileSet {
Name = bear_data15
Include {
Options {
compression = GZIP
signature = MD5
sparse = yes
noatime = yes
}
Options {
exclude = yes
wilddir = */.NetBin
From: Martin Simmons [mailto:mar...@lispworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 4:28 AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] SD Losing Track of Pool
On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 08:48:56 -0700, Peter Zenge said:
A couple days ago somebody made a comment that
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Martin Simmons wrote:
This will never compress -- the default Options clause needs to the last
one, but you have it as the first one.
Yes, of course you are correct; thank you. And I've even read that in the
documentation. And moving the default Options clause to the end
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sean Clark smcl...@tamu.edu
Date: Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Very low performance with compression and
encryption !
To: John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com
On 01/20/2011 09:00 AM, John Drescher wrote:
This is normal. If
This is normal. If you want fast compression do not use software
compression and use a tape drive with HW compression like LTO drives.
John
Not really an option for file/disk devices though.
I've been tempted to experiment with BTRFS using LZO or standard zlib
compression for storing the
On 01/20/2011 10:01 AM, John Drescher wrote:
I've been tempted to experiment with BTRFS using LZO or standard zlib
compression for storing the volumes and see how the performance compares
to having bacula-fd do the compression before sending - I have a
suspicion the former might be better..
On Jan 20, 2011, at 11:01 AM, John Drescher wrote:
This is normal. If you want fast compression do not use software
compression and use a tape drive with HW compression like LTO drives.
John
Not really an option for file/disk devices though.
I've been tempted to experiment with BTRFS
2011/1/20 Paul Mather p...@gromit.dlib.vt.edu:
On Jan 20, 2011, at 11:01 AM, John Drescher wrote:
This is normal. If you want fast compression do not use software
compression and use a tape drive with HW compression like LTO drives.
John
Not really an option for file/disk devices though.
On Thu, January 20, 2011 10:35 am, Steve Thompson wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Martin Simmons wrote:
This will never compress -- the default Options clause needs to the
last
one, but you have it as the first one.
Yes, of course you are correct; thank you. And I've even read that in the
On Thu, January 20, 2011 12:28 pm, Silver Salonen wrote:
On Thursday 20 January 2011 19:02:33 Paul Mather wrote:
On Jan 20, 2011, at 11:01 AM, John Drescher wrote:
This is normal. If you want fast compression do not use software
compression and use a tape drive with HW compression like LTO
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:18:35 -0700, Peter Zenge said:
Admittedly I confused the issue by posting an example with two Pools
involved. Even in that example though, there were jobs using the same pool
as the mounted volume, and they wouldn't run until the 2 current jobs were
done (which
On 1/20/2011 7:18 AM, Peter Zenge wrote:
Second, in the Device Status section at the bottom, the pool of LF-F-
0239 is
listed as *unknown*; similarly, under Jobs waiting to reserve a
drive,
each job wants the correct pool, but the current pool is listed as
.
Admittedly I confused the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/20/2011 12:35 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On Thu, January 20, 2011 10:35 am, Steve Thompson wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011, Martin Simmons wrote:
This will never compress -- the default Options clause needs to the
last
one, but you have it as
-Original Message-
From: Steve Ellis [mailto:el...@brouhaha.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 10:39 AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] SD Losing Track of Pool
On 1/20/2011 7:18 AM, Peter Zenge wrote:
Second, in the Device Status section at
-Original Message-
From: Martin Simmons [mailto:mar...@lispworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 10:47 AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] SD Losing Track of Pool
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 08:18:35 -0700, Peter Zenge said:
Admittedly I
On 1/19/11 8:31 PM, Mike Ruskai wrote:
On 1/19/2011 7:47 PM, Juergen Zahrer wrote:
Hi list,
amanda passes the whole archive to the client even if only a few files
are restored. that takes a very very long time for
one small file in a big dump over 100 Mb.
what about bacula? does bacula
On Jan 20, 2011, at 12:44 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On Thu, January 20, 2011 12:28 pm, Silver Salonen wrote:
On Thursday 20 January 2011 19:02:33 Paul Mather wrote:
On Jan 20, 2011, at 11:01 AM, John Drescher wrote:
This is normal. If you want fast compression do not use software
Hi,
I have a HP 1760 SAS LTO-4 drive with an LSI 9212 hba under Ubuntu
10.04, Bacula 5.0.3.
The drive is set for variable blocks. I cannot get any block size above
64K to work. 64K works just fine. Any ideas?
Btape says (using 256K block):
btape: btape.c:1148 Wrote 1 blocks of 262044
John and Dan, I LOVE you guys!!
Dan, your instructions are killers.
Finally got my bacula working with the autoloader.
Now its time to learn how to manage tapes and jobs.
Any sites or information I can get from you guys?
Harry
Bingo! Thanks for your sharp eyes on this one. After this fix it configured and
made (with only a few compiler warnings).
I'm celebrating by eating a chocolate chip cookie. I'd offer one to both of you
if you were nearby. Instead I'll just encourage you to do something nice for
yourself.
I have 30 tapes to rename in the order of LTO5-001 to LTO5-050. Is there any
way to rename them automatically? The Barcode label is different so I can't use
label barcodes.
Arunav.
On Thu, January 20, 2011 4:12 pm, Arunav Mandal wrote:
I have 30 tapes to rename in the order of LTO5-001 to LTO5-050. Is there
any way to rename them automatically? The Barcode label is different so I
can't use label barcodes.
The best way is write a script.
This might have something for
On Thu, January 20, 2011 4:12 pm, Arunav Mandal wrote:
I have 30 tapes to rename in the order of LTO5-001 to LTO5-050. Is there
any way to rename them automatically? The Barcode label is different so I
can't use label barcodes.
My previous past contained the wrong URL. Try this one instead:
I periodically get tape error messages via email and from the bacula log files.
Most of them look something like this...
19-Jan 08:59 bacula02-sd JobId 913: Error: block.c:1016 Read error on fd=8 at
file:blk 0:0 on device Drive1 (/dev/nst0). ERR=Input/output error.
19-Jan 09:04 bacula02-sd
2011/1/20 Jeremiah D. Jester jj...@u.washington.edu:
I periodically get tape error messages via email and from the bacula log
files. Most of them look something like this…
19-Jan 08:59 bacula02-sd JobId 913: Error: block.c:1016 Read error on fd=8
at file:blk 0:0 on device Drive1 (/dev/nst0).
This is the 2nd time these tapes have been written too since being new. So,
there is a possibility one or two of them may have slipped through the cracks
and didn't get written to.
How do I find out which tape/s were affected?
Jeremiah Jester
Informatics Specialist
Microbiology - Katze Lab
On 1/20/2011 4:28 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
On Thu, January 20, 2011 4:12 pm, Arunav Mandal wrote:
I have 30 tapes to rename in the order of LTO5-001 to LTO5-050. Is there
any way to rename them automatically? The Barcode label is different so I
can't use label barcodes.
My previous past
On 1/17/2011 4:27 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
--On Monday, January 17, 2011 10:50:39 AM -0500 Dan Langille
d...@langille.org wrote:
(In another thread)
Even though you are doing migrate, this might help, because Migrate and
Copy are so similar.
--On Thursday, January 20, 2011 09:27:37 PM -0500 Dan Langille
d...@langille.org wrote:
On 1/17/2011 4:27 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
Eh? Have I missed some important point about using MySQL for Bacula's
catalog, or is this just the author's prejudices speaking?
As the author of the above,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/20/2011 11:25 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
--On Thursday, January 20, 2011 09:27:37 PM -0500 Dan Langille
d...@langille.org wrote:
On 1/17/2011 4:27 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
Eh? Have I missed some important point about using MySQL for Bacula's
42 matches
Mail list logo
