On 6 April 2011 02:31, Kernel Panic wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Whilst trying to find a way of doing a case-insensitive search for
> file, I found previous posts on the mailing lists that instructed me
> to use the sqlquery function in bacula. As a test I wanted to search
> for files with zfs in
On 6 April 2011 02:37, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> On Apr 5, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Kernel Panic wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Whilst trying to find a way of doing a case-insensitive search for
>> file, I found previous posts on the mailing lists that instructed me
>> to use the sqlquery function in ba
On Apr 5, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Kernel Panic wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Whilst trying to find a way of doing a case-insensitive search for
> file, I found previous posts on the mailing lists that instructed me
> to use the sqlquery function in bacula. As a test I wanted to search
> for files with
On Apr 5, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:35:07 +0100, Dermot Beirne said:
>>
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 07:40:44 +0100, Dermot Beirne said:
I'm sure that would be fine, but I'm having difficulty automatically
determining which volumes are ok
Hello everyone,
Whilst trying to find a way of doing a case-insensitive search for
file, I found previous posts on the mailing lists that instructed me
to use the sqlquery function in bacula. As a test I wanted to search
for files with zfs in their name and then with ZFS in the name. After
startin
On Apr 4, 2011, at 9:44 AM, hymie! wrote:
>
> Greetings.
>
> I could not find who the correct person to contact would be.
>
> http://bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Storage_Daemon_Configuratio.html#SECTION00203
>
> "Maximum Concurent Jobs"
>
> "Concurrent" has 2 r's.
>
On Apr 5, 2011, at 2:00 PM, Kernel Panic wrote:
> On 5 April 2011 18:46, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>> On 04/05/11 12:57, Kernel Panic wrote:
>>> Hello, yes I am using MySQL 5.5. As you advised I changed the
>>> following code in the make_mysql_tables script:
>>>
>>> CREATE TABLE Counters (
>>> C
On Mar 30, 2011, at 10:20 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Rodrigo Renie Braga wrote:
>
>> Hello list.
>>
>> Can someone send me the SQL Query to get the size that all my Full, Diff and
>> Inc backups are currently consuming? In my config, I have 5 Pools that store
>> Ful
Am 05.04.2011 21:24, schrieb Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk:
> Hi all
>
> How is Bacula suited to backing off ZFS with its ACLs? We're using ZFS for
> Windows and unix storage, and the Windows ACLs (that is, ZFS ACLs) can be
> rather diverse.
>
> Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
>
> roy
Hi,
ZFS ACLs h
Hi all
How is Bacula suited to backing off ZFS with its ACLs? We're using ZFS for
Windows and unix storage, and the Windows ACLs (that is, ZFS ACLs) can be
rather diverse.
Vennlige hilsener / Best regards
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
r...@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
On 5 April 2011 18:46, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 04/05/11 12:57, Kernel Panic wrote:
>> Hello, yes I am using MySQL 5.5. As you advised I changed the
>> following code in the make_mysql_tables script:
>>
>> CREATE TABLE Counters (
>> Counter TINYBLOB NOT NULL,
>> MinValue INTEGER DEFAULT 0,
On 04/05/11 12:57, Kernel Panic wrote:
> Hello, yes I am using MySQL 5.5. As you advised I changed the
> following code in the make_mysql_tables script:
>
> CREATE TABLE Counters (
> Counter TINYBLOB NOT NULL,
> MinValue INTEGER DEFAULT 0,
> `MaxValue` INTEGER DEFAULT 0,
> CurrentValue INTE
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:35:07 +0100, Dermot Beirne said:
>
> >> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 07:40:44 +0100, Dermot Beirne said:
> >>
> >> I'm sure that would be fine, but I'm having difficulty automatically
> >> determining which volumes are ok to prune. I need to compare the last
> >> written time
On 5 April 2011 14:31, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 04/05/11 08:05, Kernel Panic wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I orginally posted my problem on the FreeBSD forums here:
>>
>> http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=130088#post130088
>>
>> I was asked by the port maintainer to try the Bacula ma
backup server is Debian lenny running bacula 5.02, client is debian sarge
running bacula 1.38.11.
The server is a web server and on the 22nd a copy was made of the main site,
if you look at the backup job for that day, you can see an extra 4000
files. We're running daily incrementals with a full a
On 05/04/11, Steffen Fritz (frit...@googlemail.com) wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm trying to use a Dell PowerVault 124T Autochanger under Ubuntu
> Lucid, Kernel 2.6.32-24. The Operating System is running in a virtual
> machine (ESX) and the autoloader is attached via SAS. Bacula version
> is 5.0.1 (24.Fe
Hello!
I'm trying to use a Dell PowerVault 124T Autochanger under Ubuntu Lucid, Kernel
2.6.32-24. The Operating System is running in a virtual machine (ESX) and the
autoloader is attached via SAS. Bacula version is 5.0.1 (24.Feb 2010 for ubuntu
10.4).
The mtx (linux native) does not seem to wor
>> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 07:40:44 +0100, Dermot Beirne said:
>>
>> I'm sure that would be fine, but I'm having difficulty automatically
>> determining which volumes are ok to prune. I need to compare the last
>> written time to the current time and the volumes retention, and check the
>> job type
On 04/05/11 08:05, Kernel Panic wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I orginally posted my problem on the FreeBSD forums here:
>
> http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=130088#post130088
>
> I was asked by the port maintainer to try the Bacula mail lists. My
> problem is that when I try to run the
Hello!
I'm trying to use a Dell PowerVault 124T Autochanger under Ubuntu Lucid, Kernel
2.6.32-24. The Operating System is running in a virtual machine (ESX) and the
autoloader is attached via SAS. Bacula version is 5.0.1 (24.Feb 2010 for ubuntu
10.4).
The mtx (linux native) does not seem to wor
I had problems with Bacula installation on FreeBSD from ports too.
I don't know about your's but in my case I should modify make_mysql_tables
script - in that script some table and field names are same as MySQL reserved
words. Therefore you need to modify that script and put all field and table
Op 5/04/2011 14:05, Kernel Panic schreef:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I orginally posted my problem on the FreeBSD forums here:
>
> http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=130088#post130088
>
> I was asked by the port maintainer to try the Bacula mail lists. My
> problem is that when I try to run the
Hello everyone,
I orginally posted my problem on the FreeBSD forums here:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?p=130088#post130088
I was asked by the port maintainer to try the Bacula mail lists. My
problem is that when I try to run the database setup scripts supplied
with Bacula as specifie
Thanks for your reply.
Well… I don’t want to experience situation when in case of disaster I cannot
restore system because „something else in the job didn't go so well”. I would
like to know what exactly didn’t go so well to avoid this in future.
Unfortunately log file doesn’t show more than em
Hi,
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011, Gavin McCullagh wrote:
> When I was starting out, I came across a post somewhere on the lists that
> said it was a good idea with disk volumes to create a separate storage
> device for each client as it would avoid concurrency issues, etc.
>
> I went a little further wit
On 5. apr. 2011, at 12.01, Edgars Mazurs wrote:
> Non-fatal FD errors:1
> SD Errors: 0
> FD termination status: OK
> SD termination status: OK
> Termination:Backup OK -- with warnings
>
> So I am not sure whether backup went fine or not!? And what causes
Hi.. again
This morning I noticed the same error in Windows 2008 Server backup report. So
it’s not only Win2003 backup issue. Does anybody have an idea what could cause
this?
Thanks
Edgars
From: Edgars Mazurs
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 12:39 PM
To: 'bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subje
> On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 07:40:44 +0100, Dermot Beirne said:
>
> I'm sure that would be fine, but I'm having difficulty automatically
> determining which volumes are ok to prune. I need to compare the last
> written time to the current time and the volumes retention, and check the
> job type and s
On 5. apr. 2011, at 09.06, Tor Willy Austerslått wrote:
> On 5. apr. 2011, at 07.19, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
>
>>> Last week we began having problems backing up one particular server. It's a
>>> terminal server with (almost) the exact same contents as servers that backs
>>> up just fine. The bac
On 5. apr. 2011, at 07.19, Bruno Friedmann wrote:
>> Last week we began having problems backing up one particular server. It's a
>> terminal server with (almost) the exact same contents as servers that backs
>> up just fine. The backup doesn't even start, but bombs out with "Fatal
>> error: Soc
On 5. apr. 2011, at 05.40, Mehma Sarja wrote:
> That is a nice name! It could be a file name. It is good that it backs
> up one file, how about one directory?
>
> Mehma
Thanks ;)
Yes, if I expand the dummy fileset with a couple of directories, it works. If I
use the example fileset verbatim, n
Op 20110401 om 04:30 schreef John Stoffel:
>
> John> I've been happily running bacula at home, and usualy it's pretty
> John> predictable about the size of data backed up each night, but
> John> last night I had an incremental run for a specfic client which
> John> used 8Gb of data, when I normall
32 matches
Mail list logo