Hello,
I am using bacula 5.0.2 as delivered by Debian packaging system.
This morning I have jobs hanged due to no appendable volume in the
pool.
the job and file retention for the jobs are both of 1 month. The
Volume retention for all volumes in the
Hi,
I am doing some tests about spooling. I have created a spool filesystem for
testing purposes. I decided to try a quiet small one - just 10 GB. Well, I get
an ugly perfomance (10MB/s) with this one. So I assume that the spool file
system is too small - is this assumption right?
To get a
Auto reply :)
It appears I had orphaned jobs, jobmedia, file,filename and pathes
in my catalog.
I used dbcheck to get rid of all of them. The volume got pruned
and recycled properly afterwards.
Regards.
Le 01/09/2011 08:38, Alexandre
I have no answer sorry, just more questions :)
How do you measure the performance?
Does the 10MB/s comes from the bacula job report?
regards.
Le 01/09/2011 11:36, frank_sg a crit:
Hi,
I am doing some tests about spooling. I have
Il 01/09/2011 11:36, frank_sg ha scritto:
Hi,
I am doing some tests about spooling. I have created a spool filesystem for
testing purposes. I decided to try a quiet small one - just 10 GB. Well, I
get an ugly perfomance (10MB/s) with this one. So I assume that the spool
file system is too
Il 01/09/2011 11:36, frank_sg ha scritto:
Hi,
I am doing some tests about spooling. I have created a spool filesystem for
testing purposes. I decided to try a quiet small one - just 10 GB. Well, I
get an ugly perfomance (10MB/s) with this one. So I assume that the spool
file system is too
Thanks fpr replying.
@Alexandre: Yes, exactly, the 10MB/s (average) come from bacula job report.
@Marcello: No - very time the spool fs is full (or the maximum spool size per
job etc.) is reached the spool fs is despooled to tape. And that is where I
hope to get the advantage from: despooling
Il 01/09/2011 13:38, frank_sg ha scritto:
Thanks fpr replying.
@Alexandre: Yes, exactly, the 10MB/s (average) come from bacula job
report.
@Marcello: No - very time the spool fs is full (or the maximum spool
size per job etc.) is reached the spool fs is despooled to tape. And
that is where
I am doing some tests about spooling. I have created a spool filesystem for
testing purposes. I decided to try a quiet small one - just 10 GB. Well, I
get an ugly perfomance (10MB/s) with this one. So I assume that the spool
file system is too small - is this assumption right?
Remember
Le 01/09/2011 13:38, frank_sg a écrit :
Thanks fpr replying.
@Alexandre: Yes, exactly, the 10MB/s (average) come from bacula job report.
At least in my reports the speed shown is the amount of data transferred
divided by the amount of time to complete the job.
For example I had a job which
2011/9/1 Alexandre Chapellon a.chapel...@horoa.net
Hello,
I am using bacula 5.0.2 as delivered by Debian packaging system.
This morning I have jobs hanged due to no appendable volume in the pool.
the job and file retention for the jobs are both of 1 month. The Volume
retention for all
Le 01/09/2011 14:33, John Drescher a écrit :
2011/9/1 Alexandre Chapellon a.chapel...@horoa.net
mailto:a.chapel...@horoa.net
Hello,
I am using bacula 5.0.2 as delivered by Debian packaging system.
This morning I have jobs hanged due to no appendable volume in the
pool.
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:36:08AM -0700, frank_sg wrote:
To get a bigger spool fs, there might be some options:
1) What is better: bigger spool fs or faster spool fs? So first option: 3,6
TB RAID0 with 12 SAS disks direct attatched vs second option: 2 or 3 120 GB
SSDs?
2) Does it make any
Hi,
we are using a Tandberg autchanger with eight LTO3 tapes, which could save
400/800 GB of data.
Herre is the definition of the device in bacula-sd.conf:
Device {
Name = Drive-1
Media Type = Ultrium-LTO3
Archive Device = /dev/st0
AutomaticMount = yes;
AlwaysOpen =
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Stefan Michael Guenther
s.guent...@in-put.de wrote:
Hi,
we are using a Tandberg autchanger with eight LTO3 tapes, which could save
400/800 GB of data.
Herre is the definition of the device in bacula-sd.conf:
Device {
Name = Drive-1
Media Type =
Hi,
I think this setting is not good Media Type = Ultrium-LTO3.
I have this in my setup: Media Type = LTO-3.
Below is my configuration of my SD:
Autochanger {
Name = Dell-PV124T
Device = ULTRIUM-TD3
Changer Command =
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 10:28 AM, François Cabelguen
fcabelg...@adeuza.com wrote:
Hi,
I think this setting is not good Media Type = Ultrium-LTO3.
I have this in my setup: Media Type = LTO-3.
Bacula does not care what you have for these as long as they match.
You could put dog or cat in them
Op 1/09/2011 16:28, François Cabelguen schreef:
Hi,
I think this setting is not good Media Type = Ultrium-LTO3.
I have this in my setup: Media Type = LTO-3.
Media type is irrelevant, and you can choose any value for it. If I were
to call my LTO-3 tapes Grey Bricks then bacula would happily
In the message dated: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:09:36 +0200,
The pithy ruminations from Marcello Romani on
Re: [Bacula-users] Questions about spooling were:
= Il 01/09/2011 13:38, frank_sg ha scritto:
= Thanks fpr replying.
=
= @Alexandre: Yes, exactly, the 10MB/s (average) come from bacula job
=
Hi,
you do not impose a limit on how many bytes that bacula can write to a
tape bacula will write as many bytes as it can up until it hits the
first tape write error. At this point bacula assumes the tape is full.
Check your dmesg to see if there are any problems. Also try a brand
new LTO3
Stefan Michael Guenther wrote:
Hi,
you do not impose a limit on how many bytes that bacula can write to a
tape bacula will write as many bytes as it can up until it hits the
first tape write error. At this point bacula assumes the tape is full.
Check your dmesg to see if there are any
Dear all,
little by little I'm starting to understand bacula's working way
. I need someone to help me with this issue. Thanks in advance to all of
you.
01-Sep 12:03 li253-251-dir JobId 14: No prior Full backup Job record found.
01-Sep 12:03 li253-251-dir JobId 14: No prior or
Hi Alan,
THANKS for the long list of suggestions! It will check this during the next
days and hopefully send positive results to the list.
Stefan
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
An: Stefan Michael Guenther s.guent...@in-put.de;
CC: John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com;
Storage daemon didn't accept Device FileStorage because:
3924 Device FileStorage not in SD Device resources.
does your /etc/bacula-sd.conf has something like this in it:
Device {
Name = FileStorage
Media Type = File
Archive Device = /some-dir
LabelMedia = yes;
Storage daemon didn't accept Device FileStorage because:
3924 Device FileStorage not in SD Device resources.
Do you have a Device called FileStorage in your bacula-sd.conf?
John
--
Special Offer -- Download
On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 11:06:47AM -0400, mark.berg...@uphs.upenn.edu wrote:
[A], while it should be close to [B]. The reason for
the decrease in performance is that bacula stops all
spooling as soon as it starts de-spooling.
In an ideal configuration,
In English, I want to do a full backup on the 1st and the 16th of every
month. I also want to do a differential backup every Sunday and an
Incremental Monday-Saturday.
Here is my config:
Run = Level=Full Pool=Full-Pool Developer-PC on 1,16 at 0:05
Run = Level=Differential
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Dan Schaefer d...@performanceadmin.com wrote:
In English, I want to do a full backup on the 1st and the 16th of every
month. I also want to do a differential backup every Sunday and an
Incremental Monday-Saturday.
Here is my config:
Run = Level=Full
28 matches
Mail list logo
