Hello
I did not understand how Maximum Concurrent Jobs works. In special the
sentence Note, this directive limits only Jobs with the same name as the
resource in which it appears .
I try to describe what I want. I have some jobs of type admin. They have to
be run before backup jobs in a defined
Op 8/03/2012 9:09, Markus Kress schreef:
Hello
I did not understand how Maximum Concurrent Jobs works. In special the
sentence Note, this directive limits only Jobs with the same name as the
resource in which it appears .
I try to describe what I want. I have some jobs of type admin. They have
Hi Markus,
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 09:09:22AM +0100, Markus Kress wrote:
defined sequence. In other words: only the backup and verify jobs should
run concurrently, the admin jobs in a defined sequence before and after all
other jobs.
admin job 1
admin job 2
admin job 3
backup job client 1,
On 3/7/2012 5:28 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 03/07/2012 03:36 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
Hello,
In looking at the output below, I have a similar comment to Martin
about bat and bconsole. First, you should understand that currently
the Director only has a concept of a *single* console. When
On 03/08/2012 09:52 AM, Josh Fisher wrote:
Are you sure it is related to job completion and not just time? Does
your firewall limit the number of new TCP connections to port 9101, as
for example with the iptables -m limit module?
There is no firewall between any of the machines involved.
I'm trying to back up a Windows 7 DELL laptop but it keeps insisting on trying
to back up 56GB of data. I've added exclude entries for most of the folders
I don't want to back up but they're still being included, as confirmed in an
estimate job=ladmina listing level=Full
run. I have checked
On Wed, 07 Mar 2012 21:36:14 +0100, Kern Sibbald said:
Hello,
In looking at the output below, I have a similar comment to Martin
about bat and bconsole. First, you should understand that currently
the Director only has a concept of a *single* console. When you
run with bat, it puts the
In the message dated: Thu, 08 Mar 2012 09:38:33 PST,
The pithy ruminations from Erich Weiler on
Re: [Bacula-users] Large backup to tape? were:
= Thanks for the suggestions!
=
= We have a couple more questions that I hope have easy answers. So, it's
= been strongly suggested by several folks
On 3/8/12 9:38 AM, Erich Weiler wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions!
We have a couple more questions that I hope have easy answers. So, it's
been strongly suggested by several folks now that we back up our 200TB
of data in smaller chunks. This is our structure:
We have our 200TB in one
Hello,
I've added exclude entries for most of the folders
I don't want to back up but they're still being included,
Which folders are still being included? All of them or just some?
A lot of the default folders under windows 7 (for example 'Application
Data' and 'Local Settings' in every
Am 06.03.2012 16:07, schrieb Christian Manal:
according to the bsmtp(1) manpage, it supports UTF-8. You just need to
add the -8 option to your mailcommand(s) in bacula-dir.conf.
Thanks, that did the trick.
T.
--
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 09:38:33AM -0800, Erich Weiler wrote:
We have our 200TB in one directory. From there we have about 10,000
subdirectories that each have two files in it, ranging in size between
50GB and 300GB (an estimate). All of those 10,000 directories adds to
up about 200TB.
On Thursday 08 March 2012 20:35:10 Andrea Conti wrote:
Hello,
I've added exclude entries for most of the folders
I don't want to back up but they're still being included,
Which folders are still being included? All of them or just some?
A lot of the default folders under windows 7 (for
On 3/8/12 3:34 PM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
On Thursday 08 March 2012 20:35:10 Andrea Conti wrote:
Hello,
I've added exclude entries for most of the folders
I don't want to back up but they're still being included,
Which folders are still being included? All of them or just some?
A lot of the
Thanks for the suggestions!
We have a couple more questions that I hope have easy answers. So, it's
been strongly suggested by several folks now that we back up our 200TB of
data in smaller chunks. This is our structure:
We have our 200TB in one directory. From there we have about
Hello Admis,
We have a working Bacula ( Release 2.2.7) setup.
So far all the backup tapes are retained inside the tape library. But now we
have decided to keep 1 set offsite.
We have created a separate pool of tapes ( say 10 tapes) and taken few
important backups last week. Now couple of tapes
16 matches
Mail list logo
