hi all,
how can i restore copy jobs on tape?
how can i restore copy jobs on tape without catalog database?
i am running a copy job every day that copying the night backups on NAS to tape.
i want to restore them to another server in a branch office. how its
possible without catalog.
Thanks in A
> I edit the Address with the name of the host and with the ip addres and
> still the same.
>
>
Did you restart the bacula server? If so print the error message you
get when you run your backup.
John
--
Better than sec? N
> Get rid of 127.0.0.1 and localhost from all bacula files.
Using this (127.0.0.1 or localhost) prevents bacula from being a
network backup program since the external client can not access the
server via 127.0.0.1..
John M. Drescher
---
2012/4/3 Juan Pablo Botero :
> Hi all.
>
> I have configured bacula Server in CentOS and a client in windows, so the
> Server can see the client, testing the FileSet i can see the files of the
> client, the job run but it doesn't transfer any byte to the disk.
>
> The Storage Section in bacula-dir.
Hi all.
I have configured bacula Server in CentOS and a client in windows, so the
Server can see the client, testing the FileSet i can see the files of the
client, the job run but it doesn't transfer any byte to the disk.
The Storage Section in bacula-dir.con is:
Storage {
Name = TheFiles
# Do
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Silver Salonen wrote:
> On 03.04.2012 21:55, Dan Langille wrote:
>> A long running problem with the Bacula port is being worked on by Alonso
>> Cárdenas Márquez. I have been testing out his changes recently.
>>
>> The problem: shared libraries installed by one of th
Dan Langille wrote:
> Comments? Questions? Volunteers for testing? Volunteers for
> improvements to the solution?
Ho do other packaging solutions solve this problem? Or do they
install always the server and the client part together?
--
On 03.04.2012 21:55, Dan Langille wrote:
> A long running problem with the Bacula port is being worked on by Alonso
> Cárdenas Márquez. I have been testing out his changes recently.
>
> The problem: shared libraries installed by one of the ports are
> reinstalled by the other ports. This problem h
On 04/03/2012 08:43 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>
> Stephen, by the way, if you're not already aware of it: You probably
> want to set innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit = 0.
>
> The default value of this setting is 1, which causes the log buffer to
> be written out to the lgo file and the logfile flus
A long running problem with the Bacula port is being worked on by Alonso
Cárdenas Márquez. I have been testing out his changes recently.
The problem: shared libraries installed by one of the ports are
reinstalled by the other ports. This problem has raised its head in a few
recent posts.
The pro
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 17:23:10 +0200, Ward Poelmans said:
>
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 16:14, Martin Simmons wrote:
> >> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:39:48 -0400, John Drescher said:
> >>
> >> > Well, from the docs: "The Volume Retention record defines the length
> >> > of time that Bacula will gua
Stephen, by the way, if you're not already aware of it: You probably
want to set innodb_flush_log_at_trx_commit = 0.
The default value of this setting is 1, which causes the log buffer to
be written out to the lgo file and the logfile flushed to disk at every
transaction commit. (Which obviousl
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 16:14, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:39:48 -0400, John Drescher said:
>>
>> > Well, from the docs: "The Volume Retention record defines the length
>> > of time that Bacula will guarantee that the Volume is not reused
>> > counting from the time the last
On 4/2/12 3:33 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> On 04/02/2012 06:06 PM, Stephen Thompson wrote:
>>
>>
>> First off, thanks for the response Phil.
>>
>>
>> On 04/02/2012 01:11 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
>>> On 04/02/2012 01:49 PM, Stephen Thompson wrote:
Well, we've made the leap from MyISAM to I
Hello,
I'm trying to make a Virtual backup of a machine that I already backed-up with
a base backup and a full backup after.
The problem is that the backup's size of the virtual backup is the same of the
full backup. Witch tell us that it is not taking the base for doing the Virtual
Backup.
On 4/3/12 3:28 AM, Martin Simmons wrote:
>> On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:06:31 -0700, Stephen Thompson said:
>>
That aside, I'm seeing something unexpected. I am now able to
successfully run jobs while I use mysqldump to dump the bacula Catalog,
except at the very end of the dump th
> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 09:39:48 -0400, John Drescher said:
>
> > Well, from the docs: "The Volume Retention record defines the length
> > of time that Bacula will guarantee that the Volume is not reused
> > counting from the time the last job stored on the Volume terminated."
>
> That is correc
On 4/2/2012 4:00 PM, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm backing up with bacula using an eSATA harddisk I'd like to
> automatically mount before bacula accesses it and unmount it
> after the access is done.
I suggest using autofs to automount the drive to a specific mountpoint,
then use that mou
> Well, from the docs: "The Volume Retention record defines the length
> of time that Bacula will guarantee that the Volume is not reused
> counting from the time the last job stored on the Volume terminated."
That is correct.
> It also doesn't make sense to recycle as soon as the job no longer
>
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 15:17, John Drescher wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Ward Poelmans wrote:
>> volume is thus marked as 'used'. From the docs, I though this meant
>> that the volumes are kept for a period of 1 year before being pruned
>> and reused. However, now 6 months have passe
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Ward Poelmans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm rather new to bacula: i've worked with it for 6 months now. But
> now, there is happening something which I do not understand: Automatic
> Volume Recycling. I've got a client with a job retention of 6 months
> with autoprune on. It
Hi,
I'm rather new to bacula: i've worked with it for 6 months now. But
now, there is happening something which I do not understand: Automatic
Volume Recycling. I've got a client with a job retention of 6 months
with autoprune on. It writes to a pool (File storage) with a volume
retention of 1 yea
> On Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:06:31 -0700, Stephen Thompson said:
>
> >> That aside, I'm seeing something unexpected. I am now able to
> >> successfully run jobs while I use mysqldump to dump the bacula Catalog,
> >> except at the very end of the dump there is some sort of contention. A
> >> few
Hello,
Does anyone know whether the job directive: "Cancel Lower Level Duplicates"
applies to verify jobs too?
The scenario I have is that my main backup of around 1.5TB takes 24-48 hours to
complete. During this time, other backups run, but once my verify job is queued
by the normal daily sch
24 matches
Mail list logo
