I don't see anything on quotas being turned on in /etc/fstab and the free
inodes on the file systems is way high.
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Harris [mailto:bryanlhar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 9:43 PM
To: Fred Parks
Cc: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re:
On Jun 6, 2012, at 8:32 PM, Fred Parks wrote:
> I have tried dropping the bacula database from mysql and starting over with
> the config but I get the same error. I saw some posts about possibly being
> out of space but no file systems are even running low. What could be going
> on?
Is it possibl
On a new server build/new bacula build I am getting the following error when
attempting to run a backup job and the job just hangs there.
"backup-pb01-dir JobId 1: Fatal error: catreq.c:586 attribute create error.
sql_get.c:1096 Media record for Volume "volpool_pbserv1-0001" not found."
I have tr
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 02:19:01PM +, Bertrand, Guy wrote:
> Do you have any details on how you setup your iSCSI pass-through?? Any URL
> you can share??
I use iSCSI instead of NFS, it feels quite a bit faster and enables me
to span a volume group on local+remote disks.
In your case it might
Almir has planned support for such feature in version 0.3, but currently
webacula is your best shot.
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:49 AM, reimyx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to set up Webacula 5.5.1 with Bacula 5.2.5 on a Ubuntu 12.04
> server in order to have user based access. It worked, however, resto
Hi,
I tried to set up Webacula 5.5.1 with Bacula 5.2.5 on a Ubuntu 12.04 server in
order to have user based access. It worked, however, restores using webacula
end up failing as it resquests a restore job that isn't specified by Webacula.
So I was wondering if there's any to use the BAT in othe
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012, John Drescher might have said:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Mike Eggleston wrote:
> > On Wed, 06 Jun 2012, John Drescher might have said:
> >
> >> > I'm setting up a client. I copied the bacula-fd.conf from another
> >> > working machine and restarted the client.
> >>
>
Hi,
I want to exclude programs installed on a Windows client in C:\Program
Files. One program does not play well in that it stores it's data in
it's own directory. In the File Set definition I have excluded all under
"C:\Program Files". I want to force the inclusion of this program.
I added a "
On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Mike Eggleston wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012, John Drescher might have said:
>
>> > I'm setting up a client. I copied the bacula-fd.conf from another
>> > working machine and restarted the client.
>>
>> I assume you fixed the client name in bacula-fd.conf since it ca
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012, John Drescher might have said:
> > I'm setting up a client. I copied the bacula-fd.conf from another
> > working machine and restarted the client.
>
> I assume you fixed the client name in bacula-fd.conf since it can't be
> the same as the other client?
>
John,
The "estima
>>> bacula returns this error message:
>>>
>>> 06-juin 14:56 Bacula-dir JobId 1569 : Warning: bsock.c:129 impossible to
>>> connect at Storage daemon on 192.168.1.15:9103. ERR=3DConnection failed
>> What happens when you telnet 192.168.1.15 9103 ? Do you get a connection?
>it works only when i
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012, John Drescher might have said:
> > I'm setting up a client. I copied the bacula-fd.conf from another
> > working machine and restarted the client.
>
> I assume you fixed the client name in bacula-fd.conf since it can't be
> the same as the other client?
>
> John
John,
I re
> I'm setting up a client. I copied the bacula-fd.conf from another
> working machine and restarted the client.
I assume you fixed the client name in bacula-fd.conf since it can't be
the same as the other client?
John
--
Hi,
Am 06.06.2012 20:23, schrieb Simone Caronni:
> I'm pushing now to the repository an update with the changes
> (5.2.7-3), please remove your old symlink with these commands if you
> have multiple alternatives:
Great, thanks a lot!
--
Tilman Schmidt
Phoenix Software GmbH
Bonn, Germany
sign
Hi,
I'm setting up a client. I copied the bacula-fd.conf from another
working machine and restarted the client. I can run an "estimate
job=client-backup listing" and the results are fine. When I execute "run
yes job=client-backup" and the backup fails. I don't see an error. The
only error I find i
Hello,
I'm pushing now to the repository an update with the changes
(5.2.7-3), please remove your old symlink with these commands if you
have multiple alternatives:
alternatives --remove /usr/lib64/libbaccats-mysql-5.2.6.so
alternatives --remove /usr/lib64/libbaccats-sqlite3-5.2.6.so
alternatives
Hello,
you're right, there's a mistake in the packaging. The symlink should not
point to the backend versioned lib but to the generic one. Instead of:
# cd /etc/alternatives
# ls -lgh libbaccats*
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root 38 Jun 6 18:41 libbaccats-5.2.7.so -> /usr/lib64/
libbaccats-sqlite3-5.2.7.so
lrw
On 6/4/2012 5:32 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> I suspect that using SSD for data spooling would make little
> difference to overall backup times unless the clients being backed up
> could send data much faster than the storage server could spool it
> without SSDs. It would probably be a larger p
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 18:51:27 +0400
Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
[...]
> 2) You can connect to that socket from a non-firewalled machine
>(on the same network). You can use netcat or even telnet for this:
>$ nc 192.168.1.15 9103
>or
>$ telnet 192.168.1.15 9103
>
>If you corr
Laurent MANCHON writes:
>bacula returns this error message:
>
>06-juin 14:56 Bacula-dir JobId 1569 : Warning: bsock.c:129 impossible to
>connect at Storage daemon on 192.168.1.15:9103. ERR=Connection failed
>
>i think i have a problem with my iptables rules but i don't know where,
>i need someb
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 16:16:32 +0200
Laurent MANCHON wrote:
> --hi,
>
> bacula returns this error message:
>
> 06-juin 14:56 Bacula-dir JobId 1569 : Warning: bsock.c:129 impossible
> to connect at Storage daemon on 192.168.1.15:9103. ERR=Connection
> failed
>
> i think i have a problem with my i
--hi,
bacula returns this error message:
06-juin 14:56 Bacula-dir JobId 1569 : Warning: bsock.c:129 impossible to
connect at Storage daemon on 192.168.1.15:9103. ERR=Connection failed
i think i have a problem with my iptables rules but i don't know where,
i need somebody help to resolve this p
Hello Simone,
I had a bit of trouble with that update on a CentOS 6 server that
had been running fine with Bacula 5.2.6 from the same repo.
After the update, the director wouldn't start, complaining that
it couldn't find its database.
It turned out that the alternatives where completely hosed.
The
Am 30.04.2012 13:40, schrieb Milos Zupancic:
> We have the same problem with restoring to Windows 2008 servers using
> 5.2.6 client.
>
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 12:53 PM, Geert Stappers
> mailto:geert.stapp...@vanadgroup.com>>
> wrote:
>
> Op 20120425 om 16:01 schreef Christopher Hylarides:
>
On 06/06/12 11:10, Moray Henderson wrote:
> Are SSDs more reliable these days?
They seem to be, but I'm one of those odd people who's distrustful
enough of hdds to use raid1 (or better) on desktop systems and I would
do the same for SSDs too.
HDDs aren't particularly reliable devices in any ca
> Are SSDs more reliable these days?
In general consumer grade SSDs are more reliable than desktop hard
drives and have a longer expected lifetime (5 to 10 years versus 5
years) however in this usage pattern that may not be the case.
Although SSDs tend to have controller failure and from that they
Are SSDs more reliable these days? You read things like
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2011/05/the-hot-crazy-solid-state-drive-sca
le.html, but I'm old-fashioned enough to rate reliability above performance.
Moray.
"To err is human; to purr, feline."
-
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:37:56PM -0700, Steve O'Brien wrote:
> I had a fully working 5.0.1 installation with my Quantum Scalar i40 library
> that has 2 drives, after upgrading to 5.2.3 my backups started failing, I
> then upgraded to 5.2.6 hoping that something had been fixed no such luck.
>
>
28 matches
Mail list logo
