On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 09:35:57PM +, bacula-...@dflc.ch wrote:
Dear all,
I'm proud to announce you that Bacula-Web 5.2.10 is available for download
The full release note is available in the download section
http://bacula-web.org/download.html
Best regards
Davide
Hey Davide,
Op 20120809 om 18:42 schreef Davide Franco:
Hello all,
today I've tried to restore some files on my server and the job failed.
It appear that bacula-fd doesn't follow symbolic link.
The server run under Linux Centos version 5.8 with bacula-fd version 5.0.2
I tought that by default,
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 04:58:32PM +0100, Gary Stainburn wrote:
Hi folks.
Google has burried me once again as this seems to be a recurring question.
What is the best method of starting a restore without an interactive
interface. Basically, I want to be able to start a restore of the last
Hello all,
I've just found a way to fix the problem I have.
It was dns resolution problem (see bacula logs below).
Fatal error: Bad response to Storage command: wanted 2000 OK storage ,
got 2902 Bad storage
Anyway, I'm still trying to figure out how can I enforce the file
daemon to follow
Hello Uwe,
yes it is ! The development of Bacula-Web has been revived since November
2010.
If you want to keep informed about project news and information, you can
- subscribe to the newsletter trough
http://bacula-web.org/newsletter.html
- or trough the RSS feed
Davide,
Thanks for the latest version of Bacula-web. I installed it on our Ubuntu
server running Bacula and it produces some useful information for us.
Jack Cobb
From: bacula-...@dflc.ch [mailto:bacula-...@dflc.ch]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 5:36 PM
To:
Hello,
2012/8/10 Davide Franco dfra...@dflc.ch
Anyway, I'm still trying to figure out how can I enforce the file
daemon to follow symlinks on Linux filesystem.
Bacula does not follow any symbolic links. It just backups a symbolic link
as a symbolic link no matter if it points to the file or
On 7/25/12 10:50 AM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone else have this happen?
Probably a 1/2 dozen times over the years although it has not happened
in a long time.
Race condition?
I think so. I thought that this was supposed to be fixed though.
John
I am having this same
Hello,
this sounds good for me. It's exactly what I did to recover my data.
I just had to figure out where my data were located and it worked fine.
The issue I had was not due 'cause the file daemon doesn't follow symlinks
indeed.
Thanks for your feedback
Regards
Davide
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012
I have this problem on one of my tape drives, it is a single drive, no
autoloader.
The job is partially completed and it needs a new tape, and it requests for
me to label a new one. I have a tape that as far as I can see is perfect
for the job, right pool, purged, yet when I mount it bacula just
I'm having a similar issue. I purchased some new tapes but don't see them in
Bat or Bconsole. I put them into the drive and I suspected they would default
to the Scratch Media Pool but no such luck.
Thanks!
Regards,
Michael
From: Eric Chennells [mailto:e...@zymeworks.com]
Sent: Friday,
Eric,
Here's how you label a tape.
1. Open bconsole
2. Type update slots
3. Select your tape drive
4. It should tell you something like Volume x was not found in
catalog. Slot=xy InChanger set to zero
5. Type label and select your tape drive where the tape is
12 matches
Mail list logo
