Hi all,
I need to modify the mailcommand with a script
How can I do it?
Thank's
---
Carlo
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
From: Carlo Filippetto carlo.filippe...@gmail.com
I need to modify the mailcommand with a script
How can I do it?
I am not sure what you mean by modify the mailcommand...
Do you mean to send the mail using a script?
mailcommand = /path/to/script %r %c ...
Or do you mean to modify the
Hi,
I wanted to know if it is possible to have a volume name = to Mediaid
with the automation.
for example, volumename 3487 for a mediaid 3487
and so,
what will happen when mediaid arrives at :(
Thanks
--
I wanted to know if it is possible to have a volume name = to Mediaid
with the automation.
for example, volumename 3487 for a mediaid 3487
and so,
what will happen when mediaid arrives at :(
I would expect the next meta id to be 1 although I only have
around 400 tape + disk volumes
-- Forwarded message --
From: John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] How does the volume names automatic with mediaid
To: olivier.deles...@univ-rouen.fr
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Olivier Delestre
Last week I updated my bacula server from Ubuntu 10.04 to 12.04. During this
update Bacula was also updated from 5.0.3 to 5.2.5. Since then the backups of
my Windows 2003 servers take much longer than before.
One example:
With Bacula 5.0.3:
02-Okt 18:45 Bandsicherung-dir JobId 2574: Start
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 14:18:10 +, Carsten Pache said:
Last week I updated my bacula server from Ubuntu 10.04 to 12.04. During this
update Bacula was also updated from 5.0.3 to 5.2.5. Since then the backups
of my Windows 2003 servers take much longer than before.
...
It seems that
It seems that Sending spooled attrs to the Director takes much longer than
before. Can you give me some aid in solving this problem?
Which database backend is this?
When you upgraded Ubuntu, did the catalog database get recreated? Maybe it
has lost some indexes or the rdbms configuration
Last week I updated my bacula server from Ubuntu 10.04 to 12.04. During
this update Bacula was also updated from 5.0.3 to 5.2.5. Since then the
backups of my Windows 2003 servers take much longer than before.
...
It seems that Sending spooled attrs to the Director takes much longer
It seems that Sending spooled attrs to the Director takes much longer
than before. Can you give me some aid in solving this problem?
Which database backend is this?
When you upgraded Ubuntu, did the catalog database get recreated?
Maybe it has lost some indexes or the rdbms
10 matches
Mail list logo