> I need to migrate Bacula from PGSQL 8.3 as it's being EOL'ed. The newest
> version of PGSQL available in the FreeBSD ports tree is 9.2. Below are the
> steps I've taken to describe the migration process:
>
>
>
> Backup PGSQL config file(s
> Zitat von Doug Sampson :
>
> >>
> >> Questions:
> >>
> >> 1) Do I actually need to remove the bacula packages?
>
> From Bacula point of view, no. But your package system might force
> you because of dependencies. If you compile from source it will be
> better to link Bacula against the actual
Zitat von Doug Sampson :
>>
>> Questions:
>>
>> 1) Do I actually need to remove the bacula packages?
From Bacula point of view, no. But your package system might force
you because of dependencies. If you compile from source it will be
better to link Bacula against the actual used PostgreSQL
> On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 01:56:35 -0400, Dan Langille said:
>
> On Mar 6, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> > On 2013-03-06 09:55, Martin Simmons wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 05 Mar 2013 09:46:42 -0500, Dan Langille said:
> >>>
> >>> On 2013-02-20 04:14, Geert Stappers wrote:
> >>> > Op 20
On 3/22/2013 5:59 AM, Leon White wrote:
Hi list!
I am using Bacula 5.2.6 with vchanger 0.8.6 to backup a multi-terabyte
fileset to a bunch of 1 and 2TB drives in an eSATA virtual
autochanger. I have formatted each drive with one or two 2TB
partitions with 186x 5GB volume slots, and vchanger
In the message dated: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:57:28 +0100,
The pithy ruminations from Denny Schierz on
<[Bacula-users] Question: Keep last backups, if next backups aren't successful>
were:
=> hi,
=>
=> I have just one question:
=>
=> One backup client is now offline so Bacula can't connect to the
>> Interesting idea but it will then do more compression than it's needed - for
>> example, Bacula needs to compress only new/modified files. In the way you
>> suggested, kernel will need to compress everything again with every
>> VirtualFull backup.
>>
>
>Most of the filesystems that compress d
> Interesting idea but it will then do more compression than it's needed - for
> example, Bacula needs to compress only new/modified files. In the way you
> suggested, kernel will need to compress everything again with every
> VirtualFull backup.
>
Most of the filesystems that compress do that
>> >> Thank you, this will be the case as i'm *never* doing Full backups
>> >> (it takes ages to complete).
>> >If you are using a Virtual Full Backups then you had to run at least
>> >one Full Backup on your client. If your VF backups are not
>> >compressed then your first Full backup wasn't compr
>> Thank you, this will be the case as i'm *never* doing Full backups (it takes
>> ages to complete). Is there a way how to compress already backuped files in
>> volumes?
>
>Store the volumes on a filesystem that compresses like btrfs.
>
Interesting idea but it will then do more compression tha
> Thank you, this will be the case as i'm *never* doing Full backups (it takes
> ages to complete). Is there a way how to compress already backuped files in
> volumes?
Store the volumes on a filesystem that compresses like btrfs.
John
---
> I believe if you do not want to keep the volumes containing the last
> full around you could use a migration job to migrate the last full
> backup to some other volume that does not recycle.
Also remember that even with disk volumes bacula can only recycle an
entire volume at a time so if bacula
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Denny Schierz wrote:
>
> Am 25.03.2013 um 12:29 schrieb John Drescher :
>
>> Bacula does not support this directly. You can however figure out what
>> volumes contain the last backup and turn off recycling for those
>> volumes.
>
> thanks for the reply. In this cas
On Mon, 25 Mar 2013 14:26:07 +0100
"azurIt" wrote:
> >> Thank you, this will be the case as i'm *never* doing Full backups
> >> (it takes ages to complete).
> >If you are using a Virtual Full Backups then you had to run at least
> >one Full Backup on your client. If your VF backups are not
> >com
>Hello,
>
>2013/3/25 azurIt
>
>> Thank you, this will be the case as i'm *never* doing Full backups (it
>> takes ages to complete).
>>
>
>If you are using a Virtual Full Backups then you had to run at least one
>Full Backup on your client. If your VF backups are not compressed then your
>first Ful
Hello,
2013/3/25 azurIt
> Thank you, this will be the case as i'm *never* doing Full backups (it
> takes ages to complete).
>
If you are using a Virtual Full Backups then you had to run at least one
Full Backup on your client. If your VF backups are not compressed then your
first Full backup wa
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> how can i enable compression for VirtualFull backups? Thank you.
>> >>
>> >
>> >You cannot enable compression for a Job. You can enable compression for a
>> >FileSet. If you want to have a VirtualFull compressed enable it for a
>> >fileset.
>>
>> I did this but VirtualFull bac
Hello,
2013/3/25 azurIt
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> how can i enable compression for VirtualFull backups? Thank you.
> >>
> >
> >You cannot enable compression for a Job. You can enable compression for a
> >FileSet. If you want to have a VirtualFull compressed enable it for a
> >fileset.
>
> I did this bu
>> Hi,
>>
>> how can i enable compression for VirtualFull backups? Thank you.
>>
>
>You cannot enable compression for a Job. You can enable compression for a
>FileSet. If you want to have a VirtualFull compressed enable it for a
>fileset.
I did this but VirtualFull backups are not compressed, on
Am 25.03.2013 um 12:29 schrieb John Drescher :
> Bacula does not support this directly. You can however figure out what
> volumes contain the last backup and turn off recycling for those
> volumes.
thanks for the reply. In this case, I have a problem. The (disk) volumes are
used for other clien
Hello,
2013/3/25 azurIt
> Hi,
>
> how can i enable compression for VirtualFull backups? Thank you.
>
You cannot enable compression for a Job. You can enable compression for a
FileSet. If you want to have a VirtualFull compressed enable it for a
fileset.
best regards
--
Radosław Korzeniewski
r
Hi,
how can i enable compression for VirtualFull backups? Thank you.
azur
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sf
> One backup client is now offline so Bacula can't connect to the fd-client.
> Does Bacula keeps the last successful backups, until the client comes back?
> Or does the purge command delete them, so that I don't have any complete
> backup anymore in a few weeks?
>
Bacula does not support this d
hi,
I have just one question:
One backup client is now offline so Bacula can't connect to the fd-client. Does
Bacula keeps the last successful backups, until the client comes back? Or does
the purge command delete them, so that I don't have any complete backup anymore
in a few weeks?
cu denny
24 matches
Mail list logo
