I don't see web1.jokefire.com mentioned anywhere until this error. Why
is that?
Ok you caught me. Whoops! I was trying to obscure the real name of the
domain. That is why.
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 10:41 AM, Dan Langille d...@langille.org wrote:
On Jan 31, 2015, at 9:27 PM, Tim Dunphy
On Jan 31, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Kern Sibbald k...@sibbald.com wrote:
Hello,
I don't usually as for help on these lists, because I feel I am here to
build something for you (Bacula) and serve you rather than the other way
around. If that intrigues you, please read on ...
Would it help us
We are using Bacula 5.2.5 to backup a server with a huge amount of files.
After a full backup was done (It took 3+ days), the incremental took 10+ hours.
Notice the lines in the log:
27-Jan 23:10 server-xxx-fd JobId 1157: /run is a different filesystem. Will not
descend from / into it.
On 02/01/15 11:04, Kern Sibbald wrote:
The case of the quota code is really a bit sad from my stand point.
First, we worked a good deal with you to modify for certain of our
specifications (thank you). Then when I asked UKFast for an FLA, they
never responded despite writing a number of
As a former Bacula user I would like to express that I do not support this
lawsuit.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 12:26 PM, Kern Sibbald k...@sibbald.com wrote:
Hello,
I don't usually as for help on these lists, because I feel I am here to
build something for you (Bacula) and serve you rather than
On Feb 1, 2015, at 11:00 AM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see web1.jokefire.com mentioned anywhere until this error. Why is
that?
Ok you caught me. Whoops! I was trying to obscure the real name of the
domain. That is why.
Make sure the Address field in the Client
On Jan 31, 2015, at 12:26 PM, Kern Sibbald k...@sibbald.com wrote:
Hello,
I don't usually as for help on these lists, because I feel I am here to
build something for you (Bacula) and serve you rather than the other way
around. If that intrigues you, please read on ...
The first
Hello,
You are entitled to your opinion, but I find that such opinions
don't carry as much weight as they would if you give some reason
for it.
My reason is simple: Bacula Systems has spent quite a lot of money
(over $1 Million) paying
On Jan 31, 2015, at 9:27 PM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
I'd like to change the hostname of one of my servers that uses bacula.
So I generated some new certs after updating the hostname in /etc/hosts:
[root@web1:/etc/bacula] #ls -l /etc/pki/tls/* | grep web1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Matthew,
Yes, I would appreciate an FLA in any case.
The case of the quota code is really a bit sad from my stand point.
First, we worked a good deal with you to modify for certain of our
specifications (thank you). Then when I asked UKFast
Ben:
You wouldn't be the same Ben Erridge who posts to the Bareos mailing lists
would you?
On Feb 1, 2015, at 2:46 PM, Ben Erridge b...@cyberoblivion.com wrote:
I doubt my opinion holds much weight either way but if you want my opinion
here it is;
As anyone would expect both sides say
Yes that is me as well. What is your point? Are you accusing me of
something? I don't have any agenda and only recently have even tried bareos
as my posts suggest.
Ben:
You wouldn't be the same Ben Erridge who posts to the Bareos mailing lists
would you?
On Feb 1, 2015, at 2:46 PM, Ben Erridge
I doubt my opinion holds much weight either way but if you want my opinion
here it is;
As anyone would expect both sides say the other one is lying about many
things. I can only assume, at this point, the truth lies somewhere in
between.
With that said I think this lawsuit only hurts Bacula.
On Feb 1, 2015, at 2:46 PM, Ben Erridge b...@cyberoblivion.com wrote:
I doubt my opinion holds much weight either way but if you want my opinion
here it is;
As anyone would expect both sides say the other one is lying about many
things. I can only assume, at this point, the truth lies
The whole paraphrasing, Bacula will sue you I saw directly on the Bacula
Systems site.. I 'm sure it was worded a bit more PC. But it threatened
the possibility of legal action against anyone using the bareos software.
The whole branching/forking is bad I read many places including backups.org,
Dear Bacula Users,
I'll try to express my impartial opinion here, as a lawyer with a little
knowledge of intelectual property, hoping that anyone gets mad at me and to
settle this. =)
Bacula is licensed by GNU Affero General Public License version 3, witch
requires code modifications to be
On Feb 1, 2015, at 7:30 PM, Heitor Faria hei...@bacula.com.br wrote:
Dear Bacula Users,
I'll try to express my impartial opinion here, as a lawyer with a little
knowledge of intelectual property, hoping that anyone gets mad at me and to
settle this. =)
There is no reason to get mad at
All - I’m new to Bacula (please keep reading). I spent quite a bit of time
getting it installed after having tried the plugin with FreeNAS. Ultimately I
did a clean install myself on FreeNAS because it seemed easier and I could
connect it to my existing MySQL server. I have the system
On 01.02.2015 18:49, Phil Stracchino wrote:
On 02/01/15 11:04, Kern Sibbald wrote:
The case of the quota code is really a bit sad from my stand point.
First, we worked a good deal with you to modify for certain of our
specifications (thank you). Then when I asked UKFast for an FLA, they
19 matches
Mail list logo
