Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula bpipe Restore to FileSystem [solved]

Sorry guys, this is solved. By mistake I built binaries without acl support. Regards, === Heitor Medrado de Faria - LPIC-III | ITIL-F | Bacula Systems Certified Administrator II Treinamento Presencial Brasília: 09 a 11 de ou

[Bacula-users] Status Report

Hello, I would like to discuss the following topics: 1. Bacula Release Status 2. The FSFE and licenses 3. Vacation 1. Bacula Release Status As probably know, the latest release of Bacula version 7.2.0 was released on 14 August 2015. This should be a quite stable release because it is based on

[Bacula-users] Bacula bpipe Restore to FileSystem

Bacula Users, 1. I'm trying to restore a backup using a simple dummy bpipe plugin example: Plugin = "bpipe:/mnt/fifo/test.txt:/bin/echo fifo_teste:/usr/bin/tee /tmp/test.txt" 2. I'm able to restore the fifo into /tmp/test.txt, but I restore always terminate on error: 27-Ago 16:45 hfaria-f

Re: [Bacula-users] Compile release 7.2.0 from sources failed in Centos 6.7

I compiled 7.2.0 on around 50 VMs, I had a problem on one of the 50. I tried to identify the difference between that VM and could not so I ended up going to the version before and it compiled on that VM. I don't remember which VM it was but if you need the info I will dig through my backup notices

Re: [Bacula-users] Labeling when using native virtual autochanger

Dan, On your Virtual Autochanger, you are doing two things different from what I have always done, which could potential create problems for you. The two directives that you should remove from your Virtual Autochanger Device definitions are: AlwaysOpen = yes RemovableMedia = yes Best regard

Re: [Bacula-users] Compile release 7.2.0 from sources failed in Centos 6.7

Hello, Doing: ./configure ... options make would be fine and allow you to see if Bacula builds correctly on your system. What you do want to avoid in your particular situation is doing: make install # do not do this Best regards, Kern On 08/27/2015 06:17 AM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote: > > I

Re: [Bacula-users] Why "Wrote label to prelabeled Volume..."?

Hello, Bacula has never had any legal problems and is not likely to ever have any because we have very carefully obtained and maintained legal rights for all software contributions we use. On the other hand Bareos, which is a fork (or was) of Bacula has had legal problems, but it was never " shut

Re: [Bacula-users] Labeling when using native virtual autochanger

Hello, 2015-08-25 23:13 GMT+02:00 Heitor Faria : > >> Dan, > >> > >> At a glance I think you must have a "Drive Index=0" at the universe of > drives of > >> your autochanger. > >> > >> "Device = vDrive-1, vDrive-2, vDrive-3, vDrive-4, vDrive-5" > > > > I never considered that I needed to start in

Re: [Bacula-users] fileset which only compresses files which are not already compressed like gzip, jpeg, mpeg

Hello Martin, Thank you. On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:20 AM, Martin Simmons wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 19:50:04 +, Ana Emília M. Arruda said: > > > > Hello Luc, > > > > You"re right. I misunderstood the issue here and thought that Martin need > > to exclude compresses files from its ba

Re: [Bacula-users] Compile release 7.2.0 from sources failed in Centos 6.7

Thanks John, I'm very grateful for your time and help. I will clone my VM and test this compilation, don't worry and I come back with some updates while I waits for repos releases. Cheers -Original Message- From: John Stoffel [mailto:j...@stoffel.org] Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 9:40

Re: [Bacula-users] Compile release 7.2.0 from sources failed in Centos 6.7

reynierpm> Isn't hurt me you're right but what about if I want to reynierpm> update the release? I will need to compile again and that's reynierpm> exactly what I'm trying to avoid. If you tell me that I can reynierpm> compile and then update using repository then good I can reynierpm> compile and

Re: [Bacula-users] Compile release 7.2.0 from sources failed in Centos 6.7

Isn't hurt me you're right but what about if I want to update the release? I will need to compile again and that's exactly what I'm trying to avoid. If you tell me that I can compile and then update using repository then good I can compile and try if not I prefer to wait On Aug 27, 2015 8:45 AM, "J

Re: [Bacula-users] Compile release 7.2.0 from sources failed in Centos 6.7

It can't hurt to just do a test configure and build. Reynier> That's exactly what I thought, some bad setup on the CFLAGS, but I'll waits Reynier> until Simone builds the RPMS for CentOS, anyway thanks for your suggestion Reynier> Regards Reynier> -Original Message- Reynier> From: Jo

Re: [Bacula-users] Why "Wrote label to prelabeled Volume..."?

Btw, Isn't the Bareos project shutdown because of legal problems? jalil1408 Sunday, August 2, 2015 10:02 AMvia Postbox Why Bareos/Bacula write label while I've already

Re: [Bacula-users] fileset which only compresses files which are not already compressed like gzip, jpeg, mpeg

> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 19:50:04 +, Ana Emília M. Arruda said: > > Hello Luc, > > You"re right. I misunderstood the issue here and thought that Martin need > to exclude compresses files from its backup. > > I think the bellow now will work as desired: > > FileSet { > Name = "Full Set" > I

Re: [Bacula-users] Why "Wrote label to prelabeled Volume..."?

Hello, 2015-08-02 10:02 GMT+02:00 jalil1408 : > Why Bareos/Bacula write label while I've already labeled it? > Because of tapes. When you write a label to tape then you need to write a whole block (about 64kB, or more when you setup a larger block size). You cant write in the middle of the block