Re: [Bacula-users] restricted consoles and uids

Hello, Alternatively you can use Baculum and define restricted consoles self. In this case users have access to assigned restricted consoles even without having shell accounts. And they have bconsole access via web interface. Advantages: - no users shell accounts required - access to bconsole

Re: [Bacula-users] restricted consoles and uids

Hello, This feature is not needed. Simply specify a different bconsol.conf (different restricted console name + password) in different directories that can only be accessed by the person you want to use a particular restricted console. Best regards, Kern On 02/25/2016 08:35 AM, Peter Keller

Re: [Bacula-users] restricted consoles and uids

On 02/24/2016 06:39 PM, Peter Keller wrote: ... Also, all users would have the > same Password, and there would be nothing stopping them from > just writing a baculejo.conf for root and escalating > themselves into administrative privileges in bacula's console. As a side note backups vs

Re: [Bacula-users] restricted consoles and uids

- Original Message - > From: "Peter Keller" > To: "Heitor Faria" > Cc: "Bacula Users List" > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:39:13 PM > Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] restricted consoles and uids > Hello, >

Re: [Bacula-users] restricted consoles and uids

Hello, On 02/24/2016 05:50 PM, Heitor Faria wrote: > *Minor correction: > > cat /usr/sbin/baculejo > =>8 Cut Here >8=== > DIR_NAME=hfaria-K46CB-dir > DIR_ADDRESS=localhost > > echo " Director { > Name = $DIR_NAME > DIRport = 9101 > Address =

Re: [Bacula-users] restricted consoles and uids

*Minor correction: cat /usr/sbin/baculejo =>8 Cut Here >8=== DIR_NAME=hfaria-K46CB-dir DIR_ADDRESS=localhost echo " Director { Name = $DIR_NAME DIRport = 9101 Address = $DIR_ADDRESS Password = "" } Console { Name = $USER Password =

Re: [Bacula-users] restricted consoles and uids

> On 02/24/2016 04:41 PM, Heitor Faria wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Does bacula have any feature where, depending upon the UID of the unix user >>> executing the bconsole program, one can choose different restrictions for >>> the console and this would all be specified in one config file? >> >>

Re: [Bacula-users] restricted consoles and uids

On 02/24/2016 04:41 PM, Heitor Faria wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Does bacula have any feature where, depending upon the UID of the unix user >> executing the bconsole program, one can choose different restrictions for >> the console and this would all be specified in one config file? > > Hello,

Re: [Bacula-users] restricted consoles and uids

> Hello, > > Does bacula have any feature where, depending upon the UID of the unix user > executing the bconsole program, one can choose different restrictions for > the console and this would all be specified in one config file? Hello, Peter: please read the nice manual =>

[Bacula-users] restricted consoles and uids

Hello, Does bacula have any feature where, depending upon the UID of the unix user executing the bconsole program, one can choose different restrictions for the console and this would all be specified in one config file? Thank you! -pete

Re: [Bacula-users] Next Scheduled Jobs as SQL Query?

> Hello :) > > now that i'm going to change my employer, i wanted to leave an easy to use > Bacula server. > I've implemented many functions in my php-site. One of them is to show the > next > running jobs via the output of "status dir" from the bconsole. > > This works well, but looks a bit

[Bacula-users] Next Scheduled Jobs as SQL Query?

Hello :) now that i'm going to change my employer, i wanted to leave an easy to use Bacula server. I've implemented many functions in my php-site. One of them is to show the next running jobs via the output of "status dir" from the bconsole. This works well, but looks a bit messy.. I've

Re: [Bacula-users] bextract error

> In case it happens again I'll try and restart a single process at a time and see if I can pinpoint the root cause better. I build and repair computers for a living, and it's very common for hard drives to begin to fail slowly, rather than die all at once. The only way to know whats happening

Re: [Bacula-users] bextract error

On 02/24/16 11:09, Wanderlei Huttel wrote: > Have you tried to restore another job to check if occurs the same? No. However, after power cycling the NAS everything seems to work correctly once again. Sorry for the noise. In case it happens again I'll try and restart a single process at a time

Re: [Bacula-users] bextract error

Have you tried to restore another job to check if occurs the same? Atenciosamente Wanderlei Hüttel Enviado de Motorola Moto X2 Em 24 de fev de 2016 6:47 AM, "Andrea Venturoli" escreveu: > On 02/24/16 10:13, Wanderlei Huttel wrote: > >> Hello Andrea >> > > Hello. > > > > I

Re: [Bacula-users] bextract error

On 02/24/16 10:13, Wanderlei Huttel wrote: > Hello Andrea Hello. > I guess the error is clear, volume error! Yes, it's clear; what isn't clear is the cause/reason. > The job terminates fine? Yes: > Non-fatal FD errors:0 > SD Errors: 0 > FD termination status: OK >

Re: [Bacula-users] bextract error

Hello Andrea I guess the error is clear, volume error! The job terminates fine? Can you restore this job in bconsole? Best Regards Wanderlei Hüttel Enviado de Motorola Moto X2 Em 24 de fev de 2016 5:44 AM, "Andrea Venturoli" escreveu: > Hello. > > I'm getting an error and

[Bacula-users] bextract error

Hello. I'm getting an error and having an hard time figuring the reason, so I'm looking for some insight. I have a job that backups a Windows client. It _ dumps some databases in "Client Run Before Job"; _ backs the dump files normally to a NAS which is running bacula-sd; _ runs a "Run After