Hello Caio,
Heitor is right. You need to define StorageACL directive in your
Console resource.
In the Console and Operators Guide and in README file you can find
description to this Baculum's feature. Here is link to this guide
chapter:
Hi !!
I have a Windows client running fine with ipv4. Now, I need use ipv6 and
the bacula client not start.
Above my bacula-fd.conf on windows client: It's correct ? I'm using 5.2.10.
Thank you.
# For Bacula release 5.2.10 (06/28/12) -- Windows MinGW64
#
FileDaemon {
Name = ppercut-fd
Hello, Caio: I think there is also a StorageACL.
Regards,
===
Heitor Medrado de Faria - LPIC-III | ITIL-F | Bacula Systems Certified
Administrator II
61 8268-4220
www.bacula.com.br
In my bconsole-username.conf
Director {
Name = storage-bkp01-dir
DIRport = 9101
address = 172.19.0.1
Password = "_ydGF_yjwV12AsNtgGW7P_FhfIUs3OGiD"
}
Console {
Name = "optika"
Password = "@@@pass@@@"
}
+--
|This was
Hello,
I'm trying restore a backup on baculum, when i use the default user (admin), my
restore works fine, but when i try restore a file using some user, i can't
restore.
I created a file on /etc/bacula/bconsole-username.conf, and in my dir.conf, i
created this line:
Console {
Name =
This is a bummer. As you will have gathered I am not really a tinkerer. I am
guessing this will take time to fix, during which I cannot now take any backups.
Is there something which isn't dangerous I can do, or should I wait?
I can see this is no fault at all on Kern or Baculas part. However, a
Hello,
Fedora 23 uses gcc 5.3 and Fedora 24 uses gcc 6.1. Thus it appears that
gcc (or g++) on Fedora 24 is broken -- i.e. it generates incorrect code
for Bacula.
Best regards,
Kern
On 07/04/2016 12:58 PM, bdam wrote:
> [root@sabbath ~]# g++ -v
> bash: g++: command not found...
>
>
OK, gcc is not loaded. I will check on the Fedora web site.
Best regards,
Kern
On 07/04/2016 12:58 PM, bdam wrote:
> [root@sabbath ~]# g++ -v
> bash: g++: command not found...
>
> +--
> |This was sent by bill.dam...@yahoo.com
[root@sabbath ~]# g++ -v
bash: g++: command not found...
+--
|This was sent by bill.dam...@yahoo.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backupcentral.com.
Hello Bill,
Can you tell me what version of GNU C Fedora 24 is using using (output
from "g++ -v")?
I am not tuned in to Fedora, but if they are using gcc >= 6.0, it might
be worth while posting a bug report to Fedora. If they are using gcc >=
6.0, then a workaround it to build Bacula with
I read the bug report Kern and I think that is also my problem.
I was running bacula 7.4.1 on Fedora 23 OK, and after the update to 24 it's the
same version, but rebuilt for that platform.
I don't build from sources - everything is official Fedora, so I think anyone
using bacula on Fed 23 who
To get around the problem, you must do
three things:
1. Specify the volume name as -V Full-0590 on the command line.
2. Add -c /bacula-sd.conf to the command line
3. After the -V Full-xxx put the name of the Device in the Device
resource that
I have try it :
bls -p Full-0590
I get this:
bls: butil.c:283-0 Could not find device "Full-0590" in config file
bacula-sd.conf.
04-juil. 10:34 bls JobId 0: Fatal error: butil.c:169 Cannot find device
"Full-0590" in config file bacula-sd.conf.
What I have to do ?
I see a new feature in bacula
Hmm. It does not sound too good. I am
sorry to hear that you only find zeros everywhere. Bacula cannot
do much with zeros :-(
Still, I would suggest that you try "bls -p File" without the bsr
file. That way, it will attempt to
look at everything.
Hi Kern,
Thanks a lot for your help.
I try that:
bls -p -b /etc/bacula/read.bsr File
I get that:
Error: block_util.c:308 Volume data error at 0:0! Wanted ID: "BB02", got "".
Buffer discarded.
When I use od to display file, I see only 0 everywhere in the file.
I think it is lost forever.
But, I
Hello Bill,
OK, thanks for the responses. Unfortunately the traceback is not very
useful because the symbols have been stripped, but it did give me a
rough idea where the seg fault is coming from, and it looks like it may
be the same bug reported in the bugs database bug #2231. If you read
Thanks Kern.
Part 2/3
I have to answer in parts because this forum is saying my post contains an SQL
injection attempt!
The problem preventing this post was in the trace file so I put it here:
http://pastebin.com/PAZ3mi9n
+--
Thanks Kern.
Part 2/3
I have to answer in parts because this forum is saying my post contains an SQL
injection attempt!
I commented out the DVD entry but it made no difference. Here is bacula-sd.conf
#
# Default Bacula Storage Daemon Configuration file
#
# For Bacula release 2.4.2 (26 July
Thanks Kern.
Part 1/3
I have to answer in parts because this forum is saying my post contains an SQL
injection attempt!
This system has only had the regular Fedora 23->24 update as supplied by their
repos.
This what you meant by g++?
[code]
[root@sabbath bacula]# gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
19 matches
Mail list logo
