Re: [Bacula-users] Multiple autochanger devices

2016-10-19 Thread Josh Fisher
On 10/18/2016 11:31 AM, Eddie Appel wrote: > > Hi all, > > Looking for a bit of suggestion or direction here. Keep in mind, RTFM > is a valid response so long as you provide some hints as to which M to > R where. 😀 > > I have a pretty straight forward setup using bacula 7 on centos 6 and > two

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud

2016-10-19 Thread Kern Sibbald
On 10/19/2016 08:41 AM, Roberts, Ben wrote: The documentation is outdated and this limit was removed (or perhaps vastly increased?) somewhere around the 7 mark. I’ve had jobs running a lot longer sinc

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud

2016-10-19 Thread Josip Deanovic
On Wednesday 2016-10-19 06:41:53 Roberts, Ben wrote: > The documentation is outdated and this limit was removed (or perhaps > vastly increased?) somewhere around the 7 mark. I’ve had jobs running a > lot longer since upgrading. > > In branch-5.2: > http://www.bacula.org/git/cgit.cgi/bacula/tree/ba

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula in the cloud

2016-10-19 Thread Roberts, Ben
The documentation is outdated and this limit was removed (or perhaps vastly increased?) somewhere around the 7 mark. I’ve had jobs running a lot longer since upgrading. In branch-5.2: http://www.bacula.org/git/cgit.cgi/bacula/tree/bacula/src/lib/bnet.c#n784 bsock->timeout = 60 * 60 * 6 * 24;