[Bacula-users] encrypting backup jobs

2017-09-20 Thread Jerry Lowry
Hi, I have just started encrypting my backup jobs. I have one full backup that went from completing in Scheduled time: 12-Aug-2017 20:05:00 Start time: 13-Aug-2017 06:16:47 End time: 13-Aug-2017 15:26:35 Elapsed time: 9 hours 9 mins 48 secs to

[Bacula-users] 9.0.4 - Odd behavior - several log entries for Volume used Once Marking Volume as Used

2017-09-20 Thread Jim Richardson
Just upgraded our environment to 9.0.4. All is going well. We are noticing strange behavior in the logs. See log below. This is happening on more than one job. See configuration for this job below log. 20-Sep 09:30 bacula-dir JobId 2349: Start Backup JobId 2349,

Re: [Bacula-users] No Job status returned from FD. Backup fails

2017-09-20 Thread Martin Simmons
> On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 13:12:01 +, Matthias Koch-Schirrmeister said: > > I don't think the connection is dropped at all. Can it be that > despooling (=writing to the db) takes too long and bacula considers the > connection broken? That would be a odd behaviour. The error was "Connection

Re: [Bacula-users] Fw: Re: Renamed and moved files are backed up again

2017-09-20 Thread Dimitri Maziuk
On 2017-09-20 09:01, Fabian Brod wrote: 1.If I want to back up multiple folders with projects that have partially identical files. However, these project names can change over time. You don't want to use backup software for this. You want git or zfs with dedup on, or something. I've never

Re: [Bacula-users] Fw: Re: Renamed and moved files are backed up again

2017-09-20 Thread Fabian Brod
1.If I want to back up multiple folders with projects that have partially identical files. However, these project names can change over time. projects Project_A Project_B Project_C -> rename to Project_C01 Project_D Project_E Project_F 2.Yes, if a project consists of several

Re: [Bacula-users] No Job status returned from FD. Backup fails

2017-09-20 Thread Matthias Koch-Schirrmeister
Am 20.09.2017 um 15:38 schrieb Phil Stracchino: > I'm curious — what back-end DB are you using? It's PostgreSQL 9.5.3. Matthias -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites,

Re: [Bacula-users] No Job status returned from FD. Backup fails

2017-09-20 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 09/20/17 09:12, Matthias Koch-Schirrmeister wrote: > Am 20.09.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Josh Fisher: >> >> Yes. Job attributes, file metadata, etc. that is to be stored in the db, >> are spooled to a file in /var/spool/bacula while the fd is actively >> transmitting data. After data transmission is

Re: [Bacula-users] No Job status returned from FD. Backup fails

2017-09-20 Thread Matthias Koch-Schirrmeister
Am 20.09.2017 um 13:47 schrieb Josh Fisher: > > Yes. Job attributes, file metadata, etc. that is to be stored in the db, > are spooled to a file in /var/spool/bacula while the fd is actively > transmitting data. After data transmission is complete (or if the spool > file becomes large enough?),

Re: [Bacula-users] Named pipes in Unix

2017-09-20 Thread Heitor Faria
Hello, Nikitin, > Hello. I’ve backed up database via named pipes. The data was saved on server > and > it looks ok, but when I’m trying to restore – there is only named pipe files > restored – not data. Please help, how to restore the data? Did your fileset have the RedFifo = yes option set?

Re: [Bacula-users] No Job status returned from FD. Backup fails

2017-09-20 Thread Josh Fisher
On 9/20/2017 4:42 AM, Matthias Koch-Schirrmeister wrote: Am 19.09.2017 um 15:46 schrieb Can Şirin: My jobs have almost 30M files x 8 parallell jobs, and it takes about 20 hours to despool attributes. So you are saying that the whole backup run times out because the database is taking so

[Bacula-users] Named pipes in Unix

2017-09-20 Thread Nikitin Artem
Hello. I've backed up database via named pipes. The data was saved on server and it looks ok, but when I'm trying to restore - there is only named pipe files restored - not data. Please help, how to restore the data? --

Re: [Bacula-users] No Job status returned from FD. Backup fails

2017-09-20 Thread Matthias Koch-Schirrmeister
Am 19.09.2017 um 15:46 schrieb Can Şirin: > My jobs have almost 30M > files x 8 parallell jobs, and it takes about 20 hours to despool > attributes. So you are saying that the whole backup run times out because the database is taking so long? From what I could see with "top", the DB never

Re: [Bacula-users] No Job status returned from FD. Backup fails

2017-09-20 Thread Matthias Koch-Schirrmeister
>> Standard-Device Elapsed time=25:57:52, Transfer rate=1.463 M Bytes/second >> Sending spooled attrs to the Director. Despooling 431,639,287 bytes ... And this is how it ended - again, after five or so more hours: Fatal error: Network error with FD during Backup: ERR=Connection reset by peer