If I am not mistaken you do not need the signing key. Though you can get it
easily. The white paper discusses that.
Apparently you cannot use https as indicated in the white paper. Another user
noted so.e such minor problems on the bacula-users email list. I will correct
them tomorrow and
I retry next Thursday .
When install, and follow the guide, i have a Pb for the GPG Pub key.
For make quickly, i want to install with nogpg
If you think the problem dependency is that ?? i think no. but ...
--
Check
Hi,
the command with mysql support, it'sseem to be ok.
I don't start the bacula-dir but the installe is completed.
Where is my mistake ?? the first time , i follow the guide ( init db ) and the
bacula.
Yum remove bacula* and sql* , work fine ;)
Note : The Source compilation with git are Ok an
Hello
I noticed the same "problem" .
In the whitepaper bacula.repo is mentioned as "https" and "www", but this
address is wrong.
The correct address that worked is without "www" and "https".
[Bacula-Community]
name=CentOS - Bacula - Community
Hello,
Your command for installing Bacula seems a bit odd to me.
Did you follow the instructions in the Bacula Binary Package
Installation Guide?
Best regards,
Kern
On 06/19/2018 02:11 PM, Olivier Delestre wrote:
Hi, i have some problem to install bacula 9.0.8 on CentOs 7.5 x64.
I Want a PostgreSql but when i run the install command, see the result
below.
Why i have a bacula-mysql dependency ?? ( no gpg check for the moment )
a problem with the Rpm ??
Thanks for your help.
---
bacula.repo :
